AI and ML enable rapid processing of large datasets, and offer advanced feature extraction and pattern recognition capabilities that deliver meaningful insights, enhancing human analysts' ability to identify correlations within complex, multi - variable datasets. This is especially needed for astrobiology, where m odels must distinguish complex biotic patterns fro m intricate abiotic backgrounds. As data volume outpaces the capacity for timely data analysis, AI and ML become essential for data processing. They could also prove invaluable for the complex data analysis that will accompany flight instruments ' advancements. ML has been widely applied in image processing of large datasets in astrophysics and Earth observation ( e.g., crater identification [2 - 4], sample targeting [5]). Similar techniques that share methodology but are improved for onboard computational rest rictions could be leveraged for astrobiology missions to identify key features [6].

In oncology, recurrence after treatment is one of the major challenges, related to patients' survival and quality of life. Conventionally, prediction of cancer relapse has always relied on clinical observation with statistical model support, which almost f ails to explain the complex, multifactorial nature of tumor recurrence. This research explores how AI and ML models may incre ase the accuracy and reliability of recurrence prediction in cancer. Therefore, AI and ML create new opportunities not only for pe rsonalized medicine but also for proactive management of patients through analyzing large volumes of data on genetics, clinic al manifestations, and treatment. The paper describes the various AI and ML techniques for pattern identification and outcome predi ction in cancer patients using supervised and unsupervised learning. Clinical implications provide an opportunity to review how early interventions could happen and the design of treatment planning.

With rapid transformation of technologies, the fusion of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) in finance is disrupting the entire ecosystem and operations which were followed for decades. The current landscape is where decisions are increasingly data-driven by financial institutions with an appetite for automation while mitigating risks. The segments of financial institutions which are getting heavily influenced are retail banking, wealth management, corporate banking & payment ecosystem. The solution ranges from onboarding the customers all the way fraud detection & prevention to enhancing the customer services. Financial Institutes are leap frogging with integration of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in mainstream applications and enhancing operational efficiency through advanced predictive analytics, extending personalized customer experiences, and automation to minimize risk with fraud detection techniques. However, with Adoption of AI & ML, it is imperative that the financial institute also needs to address ethical and regulatory challenges, by putting in place robust governance frameworks and responsible AI practices.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have significantly impacted various industries, including software development. Software testing, a crucial part of the software development lifecycle (SDLC), ensures the quality and reliability of software products. Traditionally, software testing has been a labor-intensive process requiring significant manual effort. However, the advent of AI and ML has transformed this landscape by introducing automation and intelligent decision-making capabilities. AI and ML technologies enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of software testing by automating complex tasks such as test case generation, test execution, and result analysis. These technologies reduce the time required for testing and improve the accuracy of defect detection, ultimately leading to higher quality software. AI can predict potential areas of failure by analyzing historical data and identifying patterns, which allows for more targeted and efficient testing. This paper explores the role of AI and ML in software testing by reviewing existing literature, analyzing current tools and techniques, and presenting case studies that demonstrate the practical benefits of these technologies. The literature review provides a comprehensive overview of the advancements in AI and ML applications in software testing, highlighting key methodologies and findings from various studies. The analysis of current tools showcases the capabilities of popular AI-driven testing tools such as Eggplant AI, Test.ai, Selenium, Appvance, Applitools Eyes, Katalon Studio, and Tricentis Tosca, each offering unique features and advantages. Case studies included in this paper illustrate real-world applications of AI and ML in software testing, showing significant improvements in testing efficiency, accuracy, and overall software quality.

We outline the principles of classical assurance for computer-based systems that pose significant risks. We then consider application of these principles to systems that employ Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML). A key element in this "dependability" perspective is a requirement to have near-complete understanding of the behavior of critical components, and this is considered infeasible for AI and ML. Hence the dependability perspective aims to minimize trust in AI and ML elements by using "defense in depth" with a hierarchy of less complex systems, some of which may be highly assured conventionally engineered components, to "guard" them. This may be contrasted with the "trustworthy" perspective that seeks to apply assurance to the AI and ML elements themselves. In cyber-physical and many other systems, it is difficult to provide guards that do not depend on AI and ML to perceive their environment (e.g., other vehicles sharing the road with a self-driving car), so both perspectives are needed and there is a continuum or spectrum between them. We focus on architectures toward the dependability end of the continuum and invite others to consider additional points along the spectrum. For guards that require perception using AI and ML, we examine ways to minimize the trust placed in these elements; they include diversity, defense in depth, explanations, and micro-ODDs. We also examine methods to enforce acceptable behavior, given a model of the world. These include classical cyber-physical calculations and envelopes, and normative rules based on overarching principles, constitutions, ethics, or reputation. We apply our perspective to autonomous systems, AI systems for specific functions, generic AI such as Large Language Models, and to Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), and we propose current best practice and an agenda for research.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) providers have a responsibility to develop valid and reliable systems. Much has been discussed about trusting AI and ML inferences (the process of running live data through a trained AI model to make a prediction or solve a task), but little has been done to define what that means. Those in the space of ML- based products are familiar with topics such as transparency, explainability, safety, bias, and so forth. Yet, there are no frameworks to quantify and measure those. Producing ever more trustworthy machine learning inferences is a path to increase the value of products (i.e., increased trust in the results) and to engage in conversations with users to gather feedback to improve products. In this paper, we begin by examining the dynamic of trust between a provider (Trustor) and users (Trustees). Trustors are required to be trusting and trustworthy, whereas trustees need not be trusting nor trustworthy. The challenge for trustors is to provide results that are good enough to make a trustee increase their level of trust above a minimum threshold for: 1- doing business together; 2- continuation of service. We conclude by defining and proposing a framework, and a set of viable metrics, to be used for computing a trust score and objectively understand how trustworthy a machine learning system can claim to be, plus their behavior over time.

In the dynamic landscape of digital forensics, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) stands as a transformative technology, poised to amplify the efficiency and precision of digital forensics investigations. However, the use of ML and AI in digital forensics is still in its nascent stages. As a result, this paper gives a thorough and in-depth analysis that goes beyond a simple survey and review. The goal is to look closely at how AI and ML techniques are used in digital forensics and incident response. This research explores cutting-edge research initiatives that cross domains such as data collection and recovery, the intricate reconstruction of cybercrime timelines, robust big data analysis, pattern recognition, safeguarding the chain of custody, and orchestrating responsive strategies to hacking incidents. This endeavour digs far beneath the surface to unearth the intricate ways AI-driven methodologies are shaping these crucial facets of digital forensics practice. While the promise of AI in digital forensics is evident, the challenges arising from increasing database sizes and evolving criminal tactics necessitate ongoing collaborative research and refinement within the digital forensics profession. This study examines the contributions, limitations, and gaps in the existing research, shedding light on the potential and limitations of AI and ML techniques. By exploring these different research areas, we highlight the critical need for strategic planning, continual research, and development to unlock AI's full potential in digital forensics and incident response. Ultimately, this paper underscores the significance of AI and ML integration in digital forensics, offering insights into their benefits, drawbacks, and broader implications for tackling modern cyber threats.

IBM reveals that nearly half of the challenges related to AI adoption focus on data complexity (24%) and difficulty integrating and scaling projects (24%). While it may be expedient for marketers to "slap a GPT suffix on it and call it AI," businesses striving to truly implement and incorporate AI and ML face a two-headed challenge: first, it's difficult and expensive, and second, because it's difficult and expensive, it's hard to come by the "sandboxes" that are necessary to enable experimentation and prove "green shoots" of value that would warrant further investment. In short, AI and ML are inaccessible. History shows that most business shifts at first seem difficult and expensive. However, spending time and resources on these efforts has paid off for the innovators.

Enterprises need to constantly look for ways to improve and expand what they offer to the marketplace. For example, Sameena Shah, managing director of AI research at JPMorgan Chase, says the company's bankers have been looking for new ways to study early-stage startups looking to raise capital. The challenge was, she says, "finding good prospects in a domain that is fundamentally very opaque and has a lot of variability." The solution for JPMorgan Chase was a new digital platform, built off an algorithm that continually seeks out data, and learns to find prospects by triaging its data into standardized representations to describe startups and likely investors. For users, the platform also offers the context of its output, to help them understand the recommendations.

There have been theory-based endeavours that directly engage with AI and ML in the landscape discipline. By presenting a case that uses machine learning techniques to predict variables in a coastal environment, this paper provides empirical evidence of the forthcoming cybernetic environment, in which designers are conceptualized not as authors but as choreographers, catalyst agents, and conductors among many other intelligent agents. Drawing ideas from posthumanism, this paper argues that, to truly understand the cybernetic environment, we have to take on posthumanist ethics and overcome human exceptionalism.