The paper investigates the relative expressiveness of two logic-based languages for reasoning over streams, namely LARS Programs -- the language of the Logic-based framework for Analytic Reasoning over Streams called LARS -- and LDSR -- the language of the recent extension of the I-DLV system for stream reasoning called I-DLV-sr. Although these two languages build over Datalog, they do differ both in syntax and semantics. To reconcile their expressive capabilities for stream reasoning, we define a comparison framework that allows us to show that, without any restrictions, the two languages are incomparable and to identify fragments of each language that can be expressed via the other one.

Aggregates provide a concise way to express complex knowledge. While they are easily understood by humans, formalizing aggregates for answer set programming (ASP) has proven to be challenging . The literature offers many approaches that are not always compatible. One of these approaches, based on Approximation Fixpoint Theory (AFT), has been developed in a logic programming context and has not found much resonance in the ASP-community. In this paper we revisit this work. We introduce the abstract notion of a ternary satisfaction relation and define stable semantics in terms of it. We show that ternary satisfaction relations bridge the gap between the standard Gelfond-Lifschitz reduct, and stable semantics as defined in the framework of AFT. We analyse the properties of ternary satisfaction relations for handling aggregates in ASP programs. Finally, we show how different methods for handling aggregates taken from the literature can be described in the framework and we study the corresponding ternary satisfaction relations.

The paper presents a knowledge representation language $\mathcal{A}log$ which extends ASP with aggregates. The goal is to have a language based on simple syntax and clear intuitive and mathematical semantics. We give some properties of $\mathcal{A}log$, an algorithm for computing its answer sets, and comparison with other approaches.

The paper presents a knowledge representation language $\mathcal{A}log$ which extends ASP with aggregates. The goal is to have a language based on simple syntax and clear intuitive and mathematical semantics. We give some properties of $\mathcal{A}log$, an algorithm for computing its answer sets, and comparison with other approaches.

We allow representing and reasoning in the presence of nested multiple aggregates over multiple variables and nested multiple aggregates over functions involving multiple variables in answer sets, precisely, in answer set optimization programming and in answer set programming. We show the applicability of the answer set optimization programming with nested multiple aggregates and the answer set programming with nested multiple aggregates to the Probabilistic Traveling Salesman Problem, a fundamental a priori optimization problem in Operation Research.

Hence, we are mainly In the last three decades, Answer Set Programming (ASP) focused on (anti)monotone aggregates. Even for this case, has emerged as a predominant declarative programming the task is still very complicated as aggregate atoms, on one paradigm in the area of knowledge representation and logic hand, can express some features of existential quantifiers, programming (Baral 2003). One of the main focuses of recent and on the other hand, contribute to the loops (Chen et al. advances in ASP is first-order answer set programming 2006; Lee and Meng 2009) of the program.

The paper presents two equivalent definitions of answer sets for logic programs with aggregates. These definitions build on the notion of unfolding of aggregates, and they are aimed at creating methodologies to translate logic programs with aggregates to normal logic programs or positive programs, whose answer set semantics can be used to defined the semantics of the original programs. The first definition provides an alternative view of the semantics for logic programming with aggregates described by Pelov et al. The second definition is similar to the traditional answer set definition for normal logic programs, in that, given a logic program with aggregates and an interpretation, the unfolding process produces a positive program. The paper shows how this definition can be extended to consider aggregates in the head of the rules. The proposed views of logic programming with aggregates are simple and coincide with the ultimate stable model semantics, and with other semantic characterizations for large classes of program (e.g., programs with monotone aggregates and programs that are aggregate-stratified). Moreover, it can be directly employed to support an implementation using available answer set solvers. The paper describes a system, called ASP^A, that is capable of computing answer sets of programs with arbitrary (e.g., recursively defined) aggregates.

This technical note describes a monotone and continuous fixpoint operator to compute the answer sets of programs with aggregates. The fixpoint operator relies on the notion of aggregate solution. Under certain conditions, this operator behaves identically to the three-valued immediate consequence operator $Φ^{aggr}_P$ for aggregate programs, independently proposed Pelov et al. This operator allows us to closely tie the computational complexity of the answer set checking and answer sets existence problems to the cost of checking a solution of the aggregates in the program. Finally, we relate the semantics described by the operator to other proposals for logic programming with aggregates. To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP).

Disjunctive Logic Programming (DLP) is a very expressive formalism: it allows for expressing every property of finite structures that is decidable in the complexity class SigmaP2 (= NP^NP). Despite this high expressiveness, there are some simple properties, often arising in real-world applications, which cannot be encoded in a simple and natural manner. Especially properties that require the use of arithmetic operators (like sum, times, or count) on a set or multiset of elements, which satisfy some conditions, cannot be naturally expressed in classic DLP. To overcome this deficiency, we extend DLP by aggregate functions in a conservative way. In particular, we avoid the introduction of constructs with disputed semantics, by requiring aggregates to be stratified. We formally define the semantics of the extended language (called DLP^A), and illustrate how it can be profitably used for representing knowledge. Furthermore, we analyze the computational complexity of DLP^A, showing that the addition of aggregates does not bring a higher cost in that respect. Finally, we provide an implementation of DLP^A in DLV -- a state-of-the-art DLP system -- and report on experiments which confirm the usefulness of the proposed extension also for the efficiency of computation.

This paper considers the problem of reasoning on massive amounts of (possibly distributed) data. Presently, existing proposals show some limitations: {\em (i)} the quantity of data that can be handled contemporarily is limited, due to the fact that reasoning is generally carried out in main-memory; {\em (ii)} the interaction with external (and independent) DBMSs is not trivial and, in several cases, not allowed at all; {\em (iii)} the efficiency of present implementations is still not sufficient for their utilization in complex reasoning tasks involving massive amounts of data. This paper provides a contribution in this setting; it presents a new system, called DLV$^{DB}$, which aims to solve these problems. Moreover, the paper reports the results of a thorough experimental analysis we have carried out for comparing our system with several state-of-the-art systems (both logic and databases) on some classical deductive problems; the other tested systems are: LDL++, XSB, Smodels and three top-level commercial DBMSs. DLV$^{DB}$ significantly outperforms even the commercial Database Systems on recursive queries. To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP)