acoustic word
A Theoretical Framework for Acoustic Neighbor Embeddings
This paper provides a theoretical framework for interpreting acoustic neighbor embeddings, which are representations of the phonetic content of variable-width audio or text in a fixed-dimensional embedding space. A probabilistic interpretation of the distances between embeddings is proposed, based on a general quantitative definition of phonetic similarity between words. This provides us a framework for understanding and applying the embeddings in a principled manner. Theoretical and empirical evidence to support an approximation of uniform cluster-wise isotropy are shown, which allows us to reduce the distances to simple Euclidean distances. Four experiments that validate the framework and demonstrate how it can be applied to diverse problems are described. Nearest-neighbor search between audio and text embeddings can give isolated word classification accuracy that is identical to that of finite state transducers (FSTs) for vocabularies as large as 500k. Embedding distances give accuracy with 0.5% point difference compared to phone edit distances in out-of-vocabulary word recovery, as well as producing clustering hierarchies identical to those derived from human listening experiments in English dialect clustering. The theoretical framework also allows us to use the embeddings to predict the expected confusion of device wake-up words. All source code and pretrained models are provided.
Revisiting speech segmentation and lexicon learning with better features
Kamper, Herman, van Niekerk, Benjamin
We revisit a self-supervised method that segments unlabelled speech into word-like segments. We start from the two-stage duration-penalised dynamic programming method that performs zero-resource segmentation without learning an explicit lexicon. In the first acoustic unit discovery stage, we replace contrastive predictive coding features with HuBERT. After word segmentation in the second stage, we get an acoustic word embedding for each segment by averaging HuBERT features. These embeddings are clustered using K-means to get a lexicon. The result is good full-coverage segmentation with a lexicon that achieves state-of-the-art performance on the ZeroSpeech benchmarks.
Multilingual acoustic word embeddings for zero-resource languages
This research addresses the challenge of developing speech applications for zero-resource languages that lack labelled data. It specifically uses acoustic word embedding (AWE) -- fixed-dimensional representations of variable-duration speech segments -- employing multilingual transfer, where labelled data from several well-resourced languages are used for pertaining. The study introduces a new neural network that outperforms existing AWE models on zero-resource languages. It explores the impact of the choice of well-resourced languages. AWEs are applied to a keyword-spotting system for hate speech detection in Swahili radio broadcasts, demonstrating robustness in real-world scenarios. Additionally, novel semantic AWE models improve semantic query-by-example search.
Leveraging multilingual transfer for unsupervised semantic acoustic word embeddings
Jacobs, Christiaan, Kamper, Herman
Acoustic word embeddings (AWEs) are fixed-dimensional vector representations of speech segments that encode phonetic content so that different realisations of the same word have similar embeddings. In this paper we explore semantic AWE modelling. These AWEs should not only capture phonetics but also the meaning of a word (similar to textual word embeddings). We consider the scenario where we only have untranscribed speech in a target language. We introduce a number of strategies leveraging a pre-trained multilingual AWE model -- a phonetic AWE model trained on labelled data from multiple languages excluding the target. Our best semantic AWE approach involves clustering word segments using the multilingual AWE model, deriving soft pseudo-word labels from the cluster centroids, and then training a Skipgram-like model on the soft vectors. In an intrinsic word similarity task measuring semantics, this multilingual transfer approach outperforms all previous semantic AWE methods. We also show -- for the first time -- that AWEs can be used for downstream semantic query-by-example search.
Towards hate speech detection in low-resource languages: Comparing ASR to acoustic word embeddings on Wolof and Swahili
Jacobs, Christiaan, Rakotonirina, Nathanaël Carraz, Chimoto, Everlyn Asiko, Bassett, Bruce A., Kamper, Herman
We consider hate speech detection through keyword spotting on radio broadcasts. One approach is to build an automatic speech recognition (ASR) system for the target low-resource language. We compare this to using acoustic word embedding (AWE) models that map speech segments to a space where matching words have similar vectors. We specifically use a multilingual AWE model trained on labelled data from well-resourced languages to spot keywords in data in the unseen target language. In contrast to ASR, the AWE approach only requires a few keyword exemplars. In controlled experiments on Wolof and Swahili where training and test data are from the same domain, an ASR model trained on just five minutes of data outperforms the AWE approach. But in an in-the-wild test on Swahili radio broadcasts with actual hate speech keywords, the AWE model (using one minute of template data) is more robust, giving similar performance to an ASR system trained on 30 hours of labelled data.
Analyzing Acoustic Word Embeddings from Pre-trained Self-supervised Speech Models
Sanabria, Ramon, Tang, Hao, Goldwater, Sharon
Given the strong results of self-supervised models on various tasks, there have been surprisingly few studies exploring self-supervised representations for acoustic word embeddings (AWE), fixed-dimensional vectors representing variable-length spoken word segments. In this work, we study several pre-trained models and pooling methods for constructing AWEs with self-supervised representations. Owing to the contextualized nature of self-supervised representations, we hypothesize that simple pooling methods, such as averaging, might already be useful for constructing AWEs. When evaluating on a standard word discrimination task, we find that HuBERT representations with mean-pooling rival the state of the art on English AWEs. More surprisingly, despite being trained only on English, HuBERT representations evaluated on Xitsonga, Mandarin, and French consistently outperform the multilingual model XLSR-53 (as well as Wav2Vec 2.0 trained on English).
Analyzing the Representational Geometry of Acoustic Word Embeddings
Abdullah, Badr M., Klakow, Dietrich
Acoustic word embeddings (AWEs) are vector representations such that different acoustic exemplars of the same word are projected nearby in the embedding space. In addition to their use in speech technology applications such as spoken term discovery and keyword spotting, AWE models have been adopted as models of spoken-word processing in several cognitively motivated studies and have been shown to exhibit human-like performance in some auditory processing tasks. Nevertheless, the representational geometry of AWEs remains an under-explored topic that has not been studied in the literature. In this paper, we take a closer analytical look at AWEs learned from English speech and study how the choice of the learning objective and the architecture shapes their representational profile. To this end, we employ a set of analytic techniques from machine learning and neuroscience in three different analyses: embedding space uniformity, word discriminability, and representational consistency. Our main findings highlight the prominent role of the learning objective on shaping the representation profile compared to the model architecture.
Supervised Acoustic Embeddings And Their Transferability Across Languages
Ram, Sreepratha, Aldarmaki, Hanan
In speech recognition, it is essential to model the phonetic content of the input signal while discarding irrelevant factors such as speaker variations and noise, which is challenging in low-resource settings. Self-supervised pre-training has been proposed as a way to improve both supervised and unsupervised speech recognition, including frame-level feature representations and Acoustic Word Embeddings (AWE) for variable-length segments. However, self-supervised models alone cannot learn perfect separation of the linguistic content as they are trained to optimize indirect objectives. In this work, we experiment with different pre-trained self-supervised features as input to AWE models and show that they work best within a supervised framework. Models trained on English can be transferred to other languages with no adaptation and outperform self-supervised models trained solely on the target languages.
Integrating Form and Meaning: A Multi-Task Learning Model for Acoustic Word Embeddings
Abdullah, Badr M., Möbius, Bernd, Klakow, Dietrich
Models of acoustic word embeddings (AWEs) learn to map variable-length spoken word segments onto fixed-dimensionality vector representations such that different acoustic exemplars of the same word are projected nearby in the embedding space. In addition to their speech technology applications, AWE models have been shown to predict human performance on a variety of auditory lexical processing tasks. Current AWE models are based on neural networks and trained in a bottom-up approach that integrates acoustic cues to build up a word representation given an acoustic or symbolic supervision signal. Therefore, these models do not leverage or capture high-level lexical knowledge during the learning process. In this paper, we propose a multi-task learning model that incorporates top-down lexical knowledge into the training procedure of AWEs. Our model learns a mapping between the acoustic input and a lexical representation that encodes high-level information such as word semantics in addition to bottom-up form-based supervision. We experiment with three languages and demonstrate that incorporating lexical knowledge improves the embedding space discriminability and encourages the model to better separate lexical categories.
Acoustic Neighbor Embeddings
This paper proposes a novel acoustic word embedding called Acoustic Neighbor Embeddings where speech or text of arbitrary length are mapped to a vector space of fixed, reduced dimensions by adapting stochastic neighbor embedding (SNE) to sequential inputs. The Euclidean distance between coordinates in the embedding space reflects the phonetic confusability between their corresponding sequences. Two encoder neural networks are trained: an acoustic encoder that accepts speech signals in the form of frame-wise subword posterior probabilities obtained from an acoustic model and a text encoder that accepts text in the form of subword transcriptions. Compared to a triplet loss criterion, the proposed method is shown to have more effective gradients for neural network training. Experimentally, it also gives more accurate results with low-dimensional embeddings when the two encoder networks are used in tandem in a word (name) recognition task, and when the text encoder network is used standalone in an approximate phonetic matching task. In particular, in an isolated name recognition task depending solely on Euclidean nearest-neighbor search between the proposed embedding vectors, the recognition accuracy is identical to that of conventional finite state transducer(FST)-based decoding using test data with up to 1 million names in the vocabulary and 40 dimensions in the embeddings. Acoustic word embeddings (Levin et al., 2013; Maas et al., 2012) are vector representations of words that capture information on how the words sound, as opposed to word embeddings that capture information on what the words mean. A number of acoustic word embedding methods have been proposed, applied to word discrimination (He et al., 2017; Jung et al., 2019), lattice rescoring in automatic speech recognition (ASR) (Bengio & Heigold, 2014), and query-by-example keyword search (Settle et al., 2017) or detection (Chen et al., 2015). Previous works have also applied multilingual acoustic word embeddings (Kamper et al., 2020; Hu et al., 2020) to zero-resource languages, and acoustic word embeddings or acoustically-grounded word embeddings to improve acoustic-to-word (A2W) speech recognition Settle et al. (2019); Shi et al. (2020).