Reviewer 1: Thanks for the feedback and for the suggestions as to how to make the paper clearer and the examples less intimidating. Re "...how decomposing the polytope now allows it to be mapped?" If you meant "how does the decomposition help map the problem of computing an optimal correlated We'll take all of them into account. Re "broader impact" Thanks for the feedback, we agree with all your points. As you correctly recognized, we use the term "social welfare" to mean the sum of utilities of the players as is typical in the game The maximum payoff is 15. Gurobi is freely available for academic use, but we'll also mention the open-source We are definitely the first to compute optimal EFCE in it. We strongly disagree that "this paper just tells us that the work in Farina et al. [12] is Extending the construction by Farina et al. to handle the more general We strongly disagree with that.

This supplement provides in Section 2, the proof of the Theorem in the paper, in Section 3, the derivation of the ADMM equations for optimizing Eq. 10 in the paper, and in Section 4, the derivation of the update-equations for optimizing Eq. 11 in the paper, and in Section 5, the generalization of Section 3 in the paper to dropout at different layers in a deep network. This first section of the proof provides an overview, where we start with the objective function of Eq. 1 in the paper (re-stated in Eq. 2 below), and show that it is equal to the objective function in the Theorem in the paper (see Eq. 8 below) up to the factor ap + bq, which is an irrelevant constant when optimizing for B In the following, we provide the detailed steps. We first provide the sequence of manipulations at once, and then describe each step in the text below. We start by re-stating Eq. 1 in the paper (X Line 5 states the analytic simplifications obtained for the parts (a) and (b), respectively, when the number n of training-epochs approaches infinity (for convergence). The details are outlined in Sections 2.2 and 2.3 below.

We would like to thank all five (!) reviewers for their detailed reviews and their suggestions / questions, which will help In the following we will try to address the main points raised. Due to space constraints, we had unfortunately shortened this part of the paper too much, as we now realize. 'not enough' on the other features it depends on, we call this'overfitting towards the identity function' in this paper. B (which is controlled by the value of dropout-probability p, or Λ), see Eq. 6. We find it remarkable in l. 154-6 (reviewer 4) that training (diagonal removed) differs from prediction (with diagonal).

Despite the impressive capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) on various tasks, they still struggle with scenarios that involves complex reasoning and planning. Self-correction and self-learning emerge as viable solutions, employing strategies that allow LLMs to refine their outputs and learn from self-assessed rewards. Yet, the efficacy of LLMs in self-refining its response, particularly in complex reasoning and planning task, remains dubious.

The robust ability of LLMs to generate and acquire domain-specific knowledge has been a significant factor in this potential [17]. While researchers have explored the use of LLMs in answering agriculture-related exams [55], their performance in certain crop cultivation scenarios, such as pest management, has been less than satisfactory [66]. Moreover, there remains a considerable gap between the ability to answer exam questions and the application of this knowledge in real-world situations. To bridge the gap and thoroughly assess LLMs in supporting the crop science field, we introduce CROP. CROP comprises an instruction tuning dataset that equips LLMs with the necessary skills to aid tasks in crop production, along with a carefully designed benchmark to evaluate the extent to which LLMs fulfill the demands of real-world agricultural applications. We anticipate that CROP will serve the research community and also provide practical benefits to industry practitioners. E.2 LLM-based Multi-turn Dialogue Generation In recent research, several LLM-based approaches have emerged for constructing multi-turn dialogues.

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable efficacy across knowledge-intensive tasks. Nevertheless, their untapped potential in crop science presents an opportunity for advancement.

We consider the overfitting behavior of minimum norm interpolating solutions of Gaussian kernel ridge regression (i.e.