The automated future just lurched a few steps closer. Over the past few weeks, nearly all of the major AI firms--OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI, Amazon, Microsoft, and Perplexity, among others--have announced new products that are focused not on answering questions or making their human users somewhat more efficient, but on completing tasks themselves. They are being pitched for their ability to "reason" as people do and serve as "agents" that will eventually carry out complex work from start to finish. Humans will still nudge these models along, of course, but they are engineered to help fewer people do the work of many. Last month, Anthropic launched Claude Code, a coding program that can do much of a human software developer's job but far faster, "reducing development time and overhead."

If you have tips about the remaking of the federal government, you can contact Matteo Wong on Signal at @matteowong.52. A new phase of the president and the Department of Government Efficiency's attempts to downsize and remake the civil service is under way. The idea is simple: use generative AI to automate work that was previously done by people. The Trump administration is testing a new chatbot with 1,500 federal employees at the General Services Administration and may release it to the entire agency as soon as this Friday--meaning it could be used by more than 10,000 workers who are responsible for more than 100 billion in contracts and services. This article is based in part on conversations with several current and former GSA employees with knowledge of the technology, all of whom requested anonymity to speak about confidential information; it is also based on internal GSA documents that I reviewed, as well as the software's code base, which is visible on GitHub.

Generative-AI companies have been selling a narrative of unprecedented, endless progress. Just last week, OpenAI introduced GPT-4.5 as its "largest and best model for chat yet." Earlier in February, Google called its latest version of Gemini "the world's best AI model." And in January, the Chinese company DeekSeek touted its R1 model as being just as powerful as OpenAI's o1 model--which Sam Altman had called "the smartest model in the world" the previous month. Yet there is growing evidence that progress is slowing down and that the LLM-powered chatbot may already be near its peak.

The rivalry between Sam Altman and Elon Musk is entering its Apprentice era. Both men have the ambition to redefine how the modern world works--and both are jockeying for President Donald Trump's blessing to accelerate their plans. Altman's company, OpenAI, as well as Musk's ventures--which include SpaceX, Tesla, and xAI--all depend to some degree on federal dollars, permits, and regulatory support. The president could influence whether OpenAI or xAI produces the next major AI breakthrough, whether Musk can succeed in sending a human to Mars, and whether Altman's big bet on nuclear energy, and fusion reactors in particular, pans out. Understanding the competition between these two men helps illuminate Trump's particular style of governing--one defined by patronage and dealmaking.

Spending time on dating apps, I know from experience, can make you a little paranoid. When you swipe and swipe and nothing's working out, it could be that you've had bad luck. It could be that you're too picky. It could be--oh God--that you simply don't pull like you thought you did. But sometimes, whether out of self-protection or righteous skepticism of corporate motives, you might think: Maybe the nameless faces who created this product are conspiring against me to turn a profit--meddling in my dating life so that I'll spend the rest of my days alone, paying for any feature that gives me a shred of hope.

Donald Trump may be pleased enough with Elon Musk, but even as the Tesla CEO is exercising his newfound power to essentially undo whole functions of the federal government, he still has to reassure his investors. Lately, Musk has delivered for them in one way: The value of the company's shares has skyrocketed since Trump was reelected to the presidency of the United States. But Musk had much to answer for on his recent fourth-quarter earnings call--not least that in 2024, Tesla's car sales had sunk for the first time in a decade. Profits were down sharply too. Usually, when this happens at a car company, the CEO issues a mea culpa, vows to cut costs, and hypes vehicles coming to market soon.

Over the past few weeks, Donald Trump has positioned himself as an unabashed bull on America's need to dominate AI. Yet the president has also tied this newfound and futuristic priority to a more traditional mission of his: to go big with fossil fuels. A true AI revolution will need "double the energy" that America produces today, Trump said in a recent address to the World Economic Forum, days after declaring a national energy emergency. And he noted a few ways to supply that power: "We have more coal than anybody. We also have more oil and gas than anybody."

One week ago, a new and formidable challenger for OpenAI's throne emerged. A Chinese AI start-up, DeepSeek, launched a model that appeared to match the most powerful version of ChatGPT but, at least according to its creator, was a fraction of the cost to build. The program, called DeepSeek-R1, has incited plenty of concern: Ultrapowerful Chinese AI models are exactly what many leaders of American AI companies feared when they, and more recently President Donald Trump, have sounded alarms about a technological race between the United States and the People's Republic of China. This is a "wake up call for America," Alexandr Wang, the CEO of Scale AI, commented on social media. But at the same time, many Americans--including much of the tech industry--appear to be lauding this Chinese AI.

Things were not looking great for OpenAI at the end of last year. The company had been struggling with major delays on its long-awaited GPT-5 and hemorrhaging key talent--notably, Chief Scientist Ilya Sutskever, Chief Technology Officer Mira Murati, and Alec Radford, the researcher who'd set the company on the path of developing GPTs in the first place. Several people who left either joined OpenAI competitors or launched new ones. The start-up's relationship with Microsoft, its biggest backer and a crucial provider of the computing infrastructure needed to train and deploy its AI models, was being investigated by the Federal Trade Commission. And then there was Elon Musk.

Late yesterday afternoon, the president of the United States transformed, very briefly, into the comms guy for a new tech company. At a press conference capping his first full day back in the White House, Donald Trump stood beside three of the most influential executives in the world--Sam Altman of OpenAI, Larry Ellison of Oracle, and Masayoshi Son of SoftBank--and announced the Stargate Project, "the largest AI infrastructure project, by far, in history." Although Trump's rhetoric may seem to suggest otherwise, Stargate is not a new federal program but rather a private venture uniting these three companies with other leaders in the AI race, such as Microsoft and Nvidia. The new company--for which Son will serve as chairman and OpenAI will be in charge of operations--will spend a planned 500 billion over the next four years to build data centers, power plants, and other such digital infrastructure in the United States, all in hopes of developing ever more advanced AI models. Trump presented Stargate as a victory for his "America First" agenda, saying that it may "lead to something that could be the biggest of all"--an apparent reference to superintelligent machines.