A constraint satisfaction problem has compactness if any infinite set of constraints is satisfiable whenever all its finite subsets are satisfiable. We prove a sufficient condition for compactness, which holds for a range of problems including those based on the well-known Interval Algebra (IA) and RCC8. Furthermore, we show that compactness leads to a useful necessary and sufficient condition for the recently introduced patchwork property, namely that patchwork holds exactly when every satisfiable finite network (i.e., set of constraints) has a canonical solution, that is, a solution that can be extended to a solution for any satisfiable finite extension of the network. Applying these general theorems to qualitative reasoning, we obtain important new results as well as significant strengthenings of previous results regarding IA, RCC8, and their fragments and extensions. In particular, we show that all the maximal tractable fragments of IA and RCC8 (containing the base relations) have patchwork and canonical solutions as long as networks are algebraically closed.

We present a conflict-based approach to diagnosing Discrete Event Systems (DES) which generalises Reiter's Diagnose algorithm to a much broader class of problems. This approach obviates the need to explicitly reconstruct the system's behaviors that are consistent with the observation, as is typical of existing DES diagnosis algorithms. Instead, our algorithm explores the space of diagnosis hypotheses, testing hypotheses for consistency, and generating conflicts which rule out successors and other portions of the search space. Under relatively mild assumptions, our algorithm correctly computes the set of preferred diagnosis candidates. We investigate efficient symbolic representations of the hypotheses space and provide a SAT-based implementation of this framework which is used to address a real-world problem in processing alarms for a power transmission system.

Complex mission or task specification languages play a fundamentally important role in human/robotic interaction. In realistic scenarios such as emergency response, specifying temporal, resource and other constraints on a mission is an essential component due to the dynamic and contingent nature of the operational environments. It is also desirable that in addition to having a formal semantics, the language should be sufficiently expressive, pragmatic and abstract. The main goal of this paper is to propose a mission specification language that meets these requirements. It is based on extending both the syntax and semantics of a well-established formalism for reasoning about action and change, Temporal Action Logic (TAL), in order to represent temporal composite actions with constraints. Fixpoints are required to specify loops and recursion in the extended language. The results include a sound and complete proof theory for this extension. To ensure that the composite language constructs are adequately grounded in the pragmatic operation of robotic systems, Task Specification Trees (TSTs) and their mapping to these constructs are proposed. The expressive and pragmatic adequacy of this approach is demonstrated using an emergency response scenario.

We consider the problem of synthesizing an agent pro- tocol satisfying LTL specifications for multiple, partially- observable environments. We present a sound and complete procedure for solving the synthesis problem in this setting and show it is computationally optimal from a theoretical com- plexity standpoint. While this produces perfect-recall, hence unbounded, strategies we show how to transform these into agent protocols with bounded number of states.

We define generalized ontology-based production systems (GOPSs), which formalize a very general and powerful combination of ontologies and production systems. We show that GOPSs capture and generalize many existing formal notions of production systems. We introduce a powerful verification query language for GOPSs, which is able to express the most relevant formal properties of production systems previously considered in the literature. We establish a general sufficient condition for the decidability of answering verification queries over GOPSs.

A large and complex knowledge base that models some aspect of the real world can rarely be fully specified. Two examples of such underspecification are that (i) some of the cardinality constraints are omitted; (ii) some properties of all individual instances of a class are specialized across a class hierarchy, but specific references to which particular values are specialized are omitted. Such knowledge bases are of great practical interest as they are the basis of an empirically tested knowledge acquisition system that has been used to construct a knowledge base from a significant portion of a biology textbook. In this paper, we formalize an underspecified knowledge base using answer set programming, and give a set of rules called UMAP that support inheritance reasoning in such a knowledge base.

In this paper we encode some of the reasoning methods used in frame based knowledge representation languages in answer set programming (ASP). In particular, we show how cloning'' and unification'' in frame based systems can be encoded in ASP. We then show how some of the types of queries with respect to a biological knowledge base can be encoded using our methodology. We also provide insight on how the reasoning can be done more efficiently when dealing with a huge knowledge base.

We consider the problem of reasoning from inconsistent hybrid theories, i.e., combinations of a structural part given by a classical first order theory (e.g., an ontology) and a rules part as a set of declarative logic program rules (under answer-set semantics). Paraconsistent reasoning is achieved by defining an appropriate semantics, so-called paraconsistent semi-equilibrium model semantics for such hybrid theories. Appropriateness of the semantics is established with respect to desirable properties attesting design objectives, such us to generalize the underlying semantics in case of consistency, as well as to generalize existing paraconsistent semantics for the individual parts. A complexity analysis of corresponding reasoning tasks complements these results.

Entity resolution (ER) is an important and common problem in data cleaning. It is about identifying and merging records in a database that represent the same real-world entity. Recently, matching dependencies (MDs) have been introduced and investigated as declarative rules that specify ER. An ER process induced by MDs over a dirty instance leads to multiple clean instances, in general. In this work, we present disjunctive answer set programs (with stable model semantics) that capture through their models the class of alternative clean instances obtained after an ER process based on MDs. With these programs, we can obtain clean answers to queries, i.e. those that are invariant under the clean instances, by skeptically reasoning from the program. We investigate the ER programs in terms of expressive power for the ER task at hand. As an important special and practical case of ER, we provide a declarative reconstruction of the so-called union-case ER methodology, as presented through a generic approach to ER (the so-called Swoosh approach).

Many examples of epistemic reasoning in the literature exhibit a stratified structure: defaults are formulated on top of an incomplete knowledge base. These defaults derive extra information in case information is missing in the knowledge base. In autoepistemic logic, default logic and ASP this inherent stratification is not preserved as they may refer to their own knowledge or logical consequences. Defining the semantics of such logics requires a complex mathematical construction. As an alternative, this paper further develops ordered epistemic logic.