A recent trend in intelligent machines and manufacturing has been toward reconfigurable manufacturing systems, which move away from the idea of a fixed factory line executing an unchanging set of operations, and toward the goal of an adaptable factory structure. With this capability, machines can reconfigure while running, enable or disable capabilities in real time, and respond quickly to changes in the system or the environment (including faults). We propose an approach to achieving on-line reconfigurability based on a high level of system modularity supported by integrated, model-based planning and control software. We describe the implementation of this design in a prototype highly modular, parallel printing system.

We believe that these goals can be attained through the use of a very high level of modularity, both in hardware and software, combined with intelligent software. To test this hypothesis, Palo Alto Research Center (PARC) designed and built a prototype highly modular system in the printing domain. This "hypermodular" printer explores the extremes of modularity, reconfigurability, and parallelism in both hardware and software. The hardware prototype connects four standard Xerox marking engines (the component of a printer that does the actual printing) in parallel using a highly modular paper path. This configuration can achieve a print rate of four times that of an individual print engine. Reconfigurable manufacturing systems supports flexibility in configuration, graceful degradation (RMSs) were introduced as a concept in the late under component failure, and rerouting of inprocess 1990s (Koren et al. 1999), but the prerequisites, in sheets under exception conditions. These both software and hardware, for implementing them capabilities were made possible by utilizing advanced successfully have proved daunting; very few examples AI techniques in model-based planning, scheduling, of RMSs exist today in practice. These prerequisites search, and temporal reasoning such as state-space include modular, reconfigurable hardware components regression planning, partial-order scheduling, temporal as well as the software and control planning graph-based heuristic estimates, multiobjective architectures and logic to support them. RMSs can search, and fast, simple temporal network include both hard reconfigurability (physical reconfiguration) reasoning. The AI planner / scheduler incorporates and soft reconfigurability (logical reconfiguration) mostly domain-independent techniques from the (ElMaraghy 2006). This latter concept planning and scheduling research community, includes the idea of flexible routing as well as replanning enabling its flexibility and configurability to be and rescheduling.

Deployed Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence 2012

Deployed Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence 2012 Abstract This issue of AI Magazine features expanded versions of articles that discuss deployed applications from the 2012 AAAI Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-12). This issue of AI Magazine features expanded versions of articles that discuss deployed applications from the 2012 AAAI Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-12).

Our selections for this issue describe deployed applications. They explain the context, requirements, and constraints of the application, how the technology was adapted to satisfy those factors, and the impact that this innovation brought to the operation in terms of cost and performance. The articles also supply useful insights into use cases that we hope can also be translated to other work that the AI community is engaged in. In the first of these deployed application articles, eBird: A Human/Computer Learning Network to Improve Biodiversity Conservation and Research by Steve Kelling, Carl Lagoze, Weng-Keen Wong, Jun Yu, Theodoros Damoulas, Jeff Gerbracht, Daniel Fink, and Carla Gomes, the authors describe an intriguing application that successfully combines the best in human and artificial computing capabilities with an active feedback loop between people and machines. The next two papers articles describe high-value industrial applications where diagnostic capabilities avoid considerable cost and accidents on a daily basis.

This issue of AI Magazine contains the Robert S. Engelmore Memorial Lecture paper and expanded versions of articles that discuss emerging applications from IAAI-12.

This issue of AI Magazine contains the Robert S. Engelmore Memorial Lecture paper and expanded versions of articles that discuss emerging applications from IAAI-12.

Every year, AI Magazine devotes one fourth of its annual production to a special issue based on the Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence conference. Because IAAI is the premier venue for documenting the transition of AI technology into application, these special issues provide a snapshot of the state of the art in AI with the practical syllogism in mind; they present work that has value because it delivers value in use.

As a result, it is good to read these articles from a practical perspective. Papers that document deployed systems clarify the motivating application constraints, the match (and mismatch) between problems and technology, the innovations required to surmount barriers to deployment, and the impact of technology on application through practical measures of cost and benefit. Other articles describe applications that are almost feasible, drawn from papers in the IAAI emergent applications track. These papers provide a window into the search for viable applications at an earlier stage in the process of mating task with technology. All of the articles supply insight into the core question of what is feasible and why, which is a useful lens for us, as readers, to employ in viewing our own work. This special issue of AI Magazine contains expanded versions of five papers that describe deployed applications and two papers that discuss emergent applications from IAAI-11 (the article by Warrick and colleagues is from IAAI-10).

Although sentiment analysis has attracted a lot of research, little work has been done on social media data compared to product and movie reviews. This is due to the low accuracy that results from the more informal writing seen in social media data. Currently, most of sentiment analysis tools on social media choose the lexicon-based approach instead of the machine learning approach because the latter requires the huge challenge of obtaining enough human-labeled training data for extremely large-scale and diverse social opinion data. The lexicon-based approach requires a sentiment dictionary to determine opinion polarity. This dictionary can also provide useful features for any supervised learning method of the machine learning approach. However, many benchmark sentiment dictionaries do not cover the many informal and spoken words used in social media. In addition, they are not able to update frequently to include newly generated words online. In this paper, we present an automatic sentiment dictionary generation method, called Constrained Symmetric Nonnegative Matrix Factorization (CSNMF) algorithm, to assign polarity scores to each word in the dictionary, on a large social media corpus — digg.com. Moreover, we will demonstrate our study of Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) on social media word polarity, using both the human-labeled dictionaries from AMT and the General Inquirer Lexicon to compare our generated dictionary with. In our experiment, we show that combining links from both WordNet and the corpus to generate sentiment dictionaries does outperform using only one of them, and the words with higher sentiment scores yield better precision. Finally, we conducted a lexicon-based sentiment analysis on human-labeled social comments using our generated sentiment dictionary to show the effectiveness of our method.