Well File:
- Well Planning ( results)
- Shallow Hazard Analysis ( results)
- Well Plat ( results)
- Wellbore Schematic ( results)
- Directional Survey ( results)
- Fluid Sample ( results)
- Log ( results)
- Density ( results)
- Gamma Ray ( results)
- Mud ( results)
- Resistivity ( results)
- Report ( results)
- Daily Report ( results)
- End of Well Report ( results)
- Well Completion Report ( results)
- Rock Sample ( results)
Tulane University and IHMC
Reports on the 2018 AAAI Spring Symposium Series
Amato, Christopher (Northeastern University) | Ammar, Haitham Bou (PROWLER.io) | Churchill, Elizabeth (Google) | Karpas, Erez (Technion - Israel Institute of Technology) | Kido, Takashi (Stanford University) | Kuniavsky, Mike (Parc) | Lawless, W. F. (Paine College) | Rossi, Francesca (IBM T. J. Watson Research Center and University of Padova) | Oliehoek, Frans A. (TU Delft) | Russell, Stephen (US Army Research Laboratory) | Takadama, Keiki (University of Electro-Communications) | Srivastava, Siddharth (Arizona State University) | Tuyls, Karl (Google DeepMind) | Allen, Philip Van (Art Center College of Design) | Venable, K. Brent (Tulane University and IHMC) | Vrancx, Peter (PROWLER.io) | Zhang, Shiqi (Cleveland State University)
The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, in cooperation with Stanford University’s Department of Computer Science, presented the 2018 Spring Symposium Series, held Monday through Wednesday, March 26–28, 2018, on the campus of Stanford University. The seven symposia held were AI and Society: Ethics, Safety and Trustworthiness in Intelligent Agents; Artificial Intelligence for the Internet of Everything; Beyond Machine Intelligence: Understanding Cognitive Bias and Humanity for Well-Being AI; Data Efficient Reinforcement Learning; The Design of the User Experience for Artificial Intelligence (the UX of AI); Integrated Representation, Reasoning, and Learning in Robotics; Learning, Inference, and Control of Multi-Agent Systems. This report, compiled from organizers of the symposia, summarizes the research of five of the symposia that took place.
Reports of the Workshops of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Bouchard, Bruno (Université du Québec à Chicoutimi) | Bouchard, Kevin (Université du Québec à Chicoutimi) | Brown, Noam (Carnegie Mellon University) | Chhaya, Niyati (Adobe Research, Bangalore) | Farchi, Eitan (IBM Research, Haifa) | Gaboury, Sebastien (Université du Québec à Chicoutimi) | Geib, Christopher (Smart Information Flow Technologies) | Gyrard, Amelie (Wright State University) | Jaidka, Kokil (University of Pennsylvania) | Keren, Sarah (Technion – Israel Institute of Technology) | Khardon, Roni (Tufts University) | Kordjamshidi, Parisa (Tulane University) | Martinez, David (MIT Lincoln Laboratory) | Mattei, Nicholas (IBM Research, TJ Watson) | Michalowski, Martin (University of Minnesota School of Nursing) | Mirsky, Reuth (Ben Gurion University) | Osborn, Joseph (Pomona College) | Sahin, Cem (MIT Lincoln Laboratory) | Shehory, Onn (Bar Ilan University) | Shaban-Nejad, Arash (University of Tennessee Health Science Center) | Sheth, Amit (Wright State University) | Shimshoni, Ilan (University of Haifa) | Shrobe, Howie (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) | Sinha, Arunesh (University of Southern California.) | Sinha, Atanu R. (Adobe Research, Bangalore) | Srivastava, Biplav (IBM Research, Yorktown Height) | Streilein, William (MIT Lincoln Laboratory) | Theocharous, Georgios (Adobe Research, San Jose) | Venable, K. Brent (Tulane University and IHMC) | Wagner, Neal (MIT Lincoln Laboratory) | Zamansky, Anna (University of Haifa)
The AAAI-18 workshop program included 15 workshops covering a wide range of topics in AI. Workshops were held Sunday and Monday, February 2–7, 2018, at the Hilton New Orleans Riverside in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. This report contains summaries of the Affective Content Analysis workshop; the Artificial Intelligence Applied to Assistive Technologies and Smart Environments; the AI and Marketing Science workshop; the Artificial Intelligence for Cyber Security workshop; the AI for Imperfect-Information Games; the Declarative Learning Based Programming workshop; the Engineering Dependable and Secure Machine Learning Systems workshop; the Health Intelligence workshop; the Knowledge Extraction from Games workshop; the Plan, Activity, and Intent Recognition workshop; the Planning and Inference workshop; the Preference Handling workshop; the Reasoning and Learning for Human-Machine Dialogues workshop; and the the AI Enhanced Internet of Things Data Processing for Intelligent Applications workshop.
Embedding Ethical Principles in Collective Decision Support Systems
Greene, Joshua (Harvard University) | Rossi, Francesca (University of Padova and IBM T. J. Watson) | Tasioulas, John (King's College London) | Venable, Kristen Brent (Tulane University and IHMC) | Williams, Brian (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
The future will see autonomous machines acting in the same environment as humans, in areas as diverse as driving, assistive technology, and health care. Think of self-driving cars, companion robots, and medical diagnosis support systems. We also believe that humans and machines will often need to work together and agree on common decisions. Thus hybrid collective decision making systems will be in great need. In this scenario, both machines and collective decision making systems should follow some form of moral values and ethical principles (appropriate to where they will act but always aligned to humans'), as well as safety constraints. In fact, humans would accept and trust more machines that behave as ethically as other humans in the same environment. Also, these principles would make it easier for machines to determine their actions and explain their behavior in terms understandable by humans. Moreover, often machines and humans will need to make decisions together, either through consensus or by reaching a compromise. This would be facilitated by shared moral values and ethical principles.
A Framework for Aggregating Influenced CP-Nets and its Resistance to Bribery
Maran, Alberto (University of Padova) | Maudet, Nicolas (LIP6, UPMC, Paris) | Pini, Maria Silvia (University of Padova) | Rossi, Francesca (University of Padova) | Venable, Kristen Brent (Tulane University and IHMC)
We consider multi-agent settings where a set of agents want to take a collective decision, based on their preferences over the possible candidate options. While agents have their initial inclination, they may interact and influence each other, and therefore modify their preferences, until hopefully they reach a stable state and declare their final inclination. At that point, a voting rule is used to aggregate the agents’ preferences and generate the collective decision. Recent work has modeled the influence phenomenon in the case of voting over a single issue. Here we generalize this model to account for preferences over combinatorially structured domains including several issues. We propose a way to model influence when agents express their preferences as CP-nets. We define two procedures for aggregating preferences in this scenario, by interleaving voting and influence convergence, and study their resistance to bribery.