Arizona State University
Invited Speaker Abstracts
Grossberg, Stephen (Boston University) | VanLehn, Kurt (Arizona State University) | Conati, Cristina (University of British Columbia) | Graesser, Arthur C. (University of Memphis) | Cherniavsky, John C. (National Science Foundation)
Unfortunately, many students stop using these beneficial learning practices as soon Presented by Stephen Grossberg, Department of Cognitive as the metatutoring ceases. Apparently, the metatutors were and Neural Systems, Center for Adaptive Systems, and Center nagging rather than convincing. This talk will present a of Excellence for Learning in Education, Science, and study of Pyrenees, a metatutor that coaches students to focus Technology, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215 on learning domain principles rather than solutions to A deep and rational understanding of the factors that influence examples. It was convincing, in that students who were effective education and learning technologies depends taught probability with Pyrenees used principle-based problem on a corresponding understanding of how the brain in health solving on post-test more so than students taught by Andes, and disease controls learned behaviors. There has been a which did not focus students on principles. Moreover, revolution in discovering new computational paradigms, organizational when all students were transferred to Andes for learning principles, mechanisms, and models of how of physics, those who were metatutored used the principlefocused learning processes enable brains to give rise to minds.
An Ensemble Learning and Problem Solving Architecture for Airspace Management
Zhang, Xiaoqin (Shelly) (University of Massachusetts) | Yoon, Sungwook (Arizona State University) | DiBona, Phillip (Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Laboratories) | Appling, Darren (Georgia Institute of Technology) | Ding, Li (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute) | Doppa, Janardhan (Oregon State University) | Green, Derek (University of Wyoming) | Guo, Jinhong (Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Laboratories) | Kuter, Ugur (University of Maryland) | Levine, Geoff (University of Illinois at Urbana) | MacTavish, Reid (Georgia Institute of Technology) | McFarlane, Daniel (Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Laboratories) | Michaelis, James (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute) | Mostafa, Hala (University of Massachusetts) | Ontanon, Santiago (Georgia Institute of Technology) | Parker, Charles (Georgia Institute of Technology) | Radhakrishnan, Jainarayan (University of Wyoming) | Rebguns, Anton (University of Massachusetts) | Shrestha, Bhavesh (Fujitsu Laboratories of America) | Song, Zhexuan (Georgia Institute of Technology) | Trewhitt, Ethan (University of Massachusetts) | Zafar, Huzaifa (University of Massachusetts) | Zhang, Chongjie (University of Massachusetts) | Corkill, Daniel (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) | DeJong, Gerald (Oregon State University) | Dietterich, Thomas (Arizona State University) | Kambhampati, Subbarao (University of Massachusetts) | Lesser, Victor (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute) | McGuinness, Deborah L. (Georgia Institute of Technology) | Ram, Ashwin (University of Wyoming) | Spears, Diana (Oregon State University) | Tadepalli, Prasad (Georgia Institute of Technology) | Whitaker, Elizabeth (Oregon State University) | Wong, Weng-Keen (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute) | Hendler, James (Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Laboratories) | Hofmann, Martin (Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Laboratories) | Whitebread, Kenneth
In this paper we describe the application of a novel learning and problem solving architecture to the domain of airspace management, where multiple requests for the use of airspace need to be reconciled and managed automatically. The key feature of our "Generalized Integrated Learning Architecture" (GILA) is a set of integrated learning and reasoning (ILR) systems coordinated by a central meta-reasoning executive (MRE). Each ILR learns independently from the same training example and contributes to problem-solving in concert with other ILRs as directed by the MRE. Formal evaluations show that our system performs as well as or better than humans after learning from the same training data. Further, GILA outperforms any individual ILR run in isolation, thus demonstrating the power of the ensemble architecture for learning and problem solving.
AAAI 2008 Spring Symposia Reports
Balduccini, Marcello (Eastman Kodak Company) | Baral, Chitta (Arizona State University) | Brodaric, Boyan (Geological Survey of Canada) | Colton, Simon (Imperial College, London) | Fox, Peter (National Center for Atmospheric Research) | Gutelius, David (SRI International) | Hinkelmann, Knut (University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland) | Horswill, Ian (Northwestern University) | Huberman, Bernardo (HP Labs) | Hudlicka, Eva (Psychometrix Associates) | Lerman, Kristina (USC Information Sciences Institute) | Lisetti, Christine (Florida International University) | McGuinness, Deborah L. (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute) | Maher, Mary Lou (National Science Foundation) | Musen, Mark A. (Stanford University) | Sahami, Mehran (Stanford University) | Sleeman, Derek (University of Aberdeen) | Thönssen, Barbara (University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland) | Velasquez, Juan D. (MIT CSAIL) | Ventura, Dan (Brigham Young University)
The titles of the eight symposia were as follows: (1) AI Meets Business Rules and Process Management, (2) Architectures for Intelligent Theory-Based Agents, (3) Creative Intelligent Systems, (4) Emotion, Personality, and Social Behavior, (5) Semantic Scientific Knowledge Integration, (6) Social Information Processing, (7) Symbiotic Relationships between Semantic Web and Knowledge Engineering, (8) Using AI to Motivate Greater Participation in Computer Science The goal of the AI Meets Business Rules and Process Management AAAI symposium was to investigate the various approaches and standards to represent business rules, business process management and the semantic web with respect to expressiveness and reasoning capabilities. The Semantic Scientific Knowledge Symposium was interested in bringing together the semantic technologies community with the scientific information technology community in an effort to build the general semantic science information community. The Social Information Processing's goal was to investigate computational and analytic approaches that will enable users to harness the efforts of large numbers of other users to solve a variety of information processing problems, from discovering high-quality content to managing common resources. The purpose of the Using AI to Motivate Greater Participation in Computer Science symposium was to identify ways that topics in AI may be used to motivate greater student participation in computer science by highlighting fun, engaging, and intellectually challenging developments in AI-related curriculum at a number of educational levels.
AAAI 2008 Spring Symposia Reports
Balduccini, Marcello (Eastman Kodak Company) | Baral, Chitta (Arizona State University) | Brodaric, Boyan (Geological Survey of Canada) | Colton, Simon (Imperial College, London) | Fox, Peter (National Center for Atmospheric Research) | Gutelius, David (SRI International) | Hinkelmann, Knut (University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland) | Horswill, Ian (Northwestern University) | Huberman, Bernardo (HP Labs) | Hudlicka, Eva (Psychometrix Associates) | Lerman, Kristina (USC Information Sciences Institute) | Lisetti, Christine (Florida International University) | McGuinness, Deborah L. (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute) | Maher, Mary Lou (National Science Foundation) | Musen, Mark A. (Stanford University) | Sahami, Mehran (Stanford University) | Sleeman, Derek (University of Aberdeen) | Thönssen, Barbara (University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland) | Velasquez, Juan D. (MIT CSAIL) | Ventura, Dan (Brigham Young University)
The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) was pleased to present the AAAI 2008 Spring Symposium Series, held Wednesday through Friday, March 26–28, 2008 at Stanford University, California. The titles of the eight symposia were as follows: (1) AI Meets Business Rules and Process Management, (2) Architectures for Intelligent Theory-Based Agents, (3) Creative Intelligent Systems, (4) Emotion, Personality, and Social Behavior, (5) Semantic Scientific Knowledge Integration, (6) Social Information Processing, (7) Symbiotic Relationships between Semantic Web and Knowledge Engineering, (8) Using AI to Motivate Greater Participation in Computer Science The goal of the AI Meets Business Rules and Process Management AAAI symposium was to investigate the various approaches and standards to represent business rules, business process management and the semantic web with respect to expressiveness and reasoning capabilities. The focus of the Architectures for Intelligent Theory-Based Agents AAAI symposium was the definition of architectures for intelligent theory-based agents, comprising languages, knowledge representation methodologies, reasoning algorithms, and control loops. The Creative Intelligent Systems Symposium included five major discussion sessions and a general poster session (in which all contributing papers were presented). The purpose of this symposium was to explore the synergies between creative cognition and intelligent systems. The goal of the Emotion, Personality, and Social Behavior symposium was to examine fundamental issues in affect and personality in both biological and artificial agents, focusing on the roles of these factors in mediating social behavior. The Semantic Scientific Knowledge Symposium was interested in bringing together the semantic technologies community with the scientific information technology community in an effort to build the general semantic science information community. The Social Information Processing's goal was to investigate computational and analytic approaches that will enable users to harness the efforts of large numbers of other users to solve a variety of information processing problems, from discovering high-quality content to managing common resources. The goal of the Symbiotic Relationships between the Semantic Web and Software Engineering symposium was to explore how the lessons learned by the knowledge-engineering community over the past three decades could be applied to the bold research agenda of current workers in semantic web technologies. The purpose of the Using AI to Motivate Greater Participation in Computer Science symposium was to identify ways that topics in AI may be used to motivate greater student participation in computer science by highlighting fun, engaging, and intellectually challenging developments in AI-related curriculum at a number of educational levels. Technical reports of the symposia were published by AAAI Press.