GPT-3 and GPT-4 models are powerful, achieving high performance on a variety of Natural Language Processing tasks. However, there is a relative lack of detailed published analysis of their performance on the task of grammatical error correction (GEC). To address this, we perform experiments testing the capabilities of a GPT-3.5 model (text-davinci-003) and a GPT-4 model (gpt-4-0314) on major GEC benchmarks. We compare the performance of different prompts in both zero-shot and few-shot settings, analyzing intriguing or problematic outputs encountered with different prompt formats. We report the performance of our best prompt on the BEA-2019 and JFLEG datasets, finding that the GPT models can perform well in a sentence-level revision setting, with GPT-4 achieving a new high score on the JFLEG benchmark. Through human evaluation experiments, we compare the GPT models' corrections to source, human reference, and baseline GEC system sentences and observe differences in editing strategies and how they are scored by human raters.

The workshop entitled "Gaps and Bridges: New Directions in Planning and Natural Language Generation" was held on 12 August 1996 in Budapest, Hungary. This article describes the four sessions of the workshop and summarizes the important themes that were revealed.

The workshop entitled "Gaps and Bridges: New Directions in Planning and Natural Language Generation" was held on 12 August 1996 in Budapest, Hungary. This article describes the four sessions of the workshop and summarizes the important themes that were revealed.