Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable success in various tasks, but concerns about their safety and the potential for generating malicious content have emerged. In this paper, we explore the power of In-Context Learning (ICL) in manipulating the alignment ability of LLMs. We find that by providing just few in-context demonstrations without fine-tuning, LLMs can be manipulated to increase or decrease the probability of jailbreaking, i.e. answering malicious prompts. Based on these observations, we propose In-Context Attack (ICA) and In-Context Defense (ICD) methods for jailbreaking and guarding aligned language model purposes. ICA crafts malicious contexts to guide models in generating harmful outputs, while ICD enhances model robustness by demonstrations of rejecting to answer harmful prompts. Our experiments show the effectiveness of ICA and ICD in increasing or reducing the success rate of adversarial jailbreaking attacks. Overall, we shed light on the potential of ICL to influence LLM behavior and provide a new perspective for enhancing the safety and alignment of LLMs.

Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) is an effective method for improving generalization ability by regularizing loss sharpness. In this paper, we explore SAM in the context of adversarial robustness. We find that using only SAM can achieve superior adversarial robustness without sacrificing clean accuracy compared to standard training, which is an unexpected benefit. We also discuss the relation between SAM and adversarial training (AT), a popular method for improving the adversarial robustness of DNNs. In particular, we show that SAM and AT differ in terms of perturbation strength, leading to different accuracy and robustness trade-offs. We provide theoretical evidence for these claims in a simplified model. Finally, while AT suffers from decreased clean accuracy and computational overhead, we suggest that SAM can be regarded as a lightweight substitute for AT under certain requirements. Code is available at https://github.com/weizeming/SAM_AT.

Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) have achieved tremendous success in processing sequential data, yet understanding and analyzing their behaviours remains a significant challenge. To this end, many efforts have been made to extract finite automata from RNNs, which are more amenable for analysis and explanation. However, existing approaches like exact learning and compositional approaches for model extraction have limitations in either scalability or precision. In this paper, we propose a novel framework of Weighted Finite Automata (WFA) extraction and explanation to tackle the limitations for natural language tasks. First, to address the transition sparsity and context loss problems we identified in WFA extraction for natural language tasks, we propose an empirical method to complement missing rules in the transition diagram, and adjust transition matrices to enhance the context-awareness of the WFA. We also propose two data augmentation tactics to track more dynamic behaviours of RNN, which further allows us to improve the extraction precision. Based on the extracted model, we propose an explanation method for RNNs including a word embedding method -- Transition Matrix Embeddings (TME) and TME-based task oriented explanation for the target RNN. Our evaluation demonstrates the advantage of our method in extraction precision than existing approaches, and the effectiveness of TME-based explanation method in applications to pretraining and adversarial example generation.

While Feedforward Neural Networks (FNNs) have achieved remarkable success in various tasks, they are vulnerable to adversarial examples. Several techniques have been developed to verify the adversarial robustness of FNNs, but most of them focus on robustness verification against the local perturbation neighborhood of a single data point. There is still a large research gap in global robustness analysis. The global-robustness verifiable framework DeepGlobal has been proposed to identify \textit{all} possible Adversarial Dangerous Regions (ADRs) of FNNs, not limited to data samples in a test set. In this paper, we propose a complete specification and implementation of DeepGlobal utilizing the SMT solver Z3 for more explicit definition, and propose several improvements to DeepGlobal for more efficient verification. To evaluate the effectiveness of our implementation and improvements, we conduct extensive experiments on a set of benchmark datasets. Visualization of our experiment results shows the validity and effectiveness of the approach.

Adversarial training has been widely acknowledged as the most effective method to improve the adversarial robustness against adversarial examples for Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). So far, most existing works focus on enhancing the overall model robustness, treating each class equally in both the training and testing phases. Although revealing the disparity in robustness among classes, few works try to make adversarial training fair at the class level without sacrificing overall robustness. In this paper, we are the first to theoretically and empirically investigate the preference of different classes for adversarial configurations, including perturbation margin, regularization, and weight averaging. Motivated by this, we further propose a \textbf{C}lass-wise calibrated \textbf{F}air \textbf{A}dversarial training framework, named CFA, which customizes specific training configurations for each class automatically. Experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that our proposed CFA can improve both overall robustness and fairness notably over other state-of-the-art methods. Code is available at \url{https://github.com/PKU-ML/CFA}.