Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems for Large Language Models (LLMs) hold promise in knowledge-intensive tasks but face limitations in complex multi-step reasoning. While recent methods have integrated RAG with chain-of-thought reasoning or test-time search using Process Reward Models (PRMs), these approaches encounter challenges such as a lack of explanations, bias in PRM training data, early-step bias in PRM scores, and insufficient post-training optimization of reasoning potential. To address these issues, we propose Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning through Trustworthy Process Rewarding (ReARTeR), a framework that enhances RAG systems' reasoning capabilities through post-training and test-time scaling. At test time, ReARTeR introduces Trustworthy Process Rewarding via a Process Reward Model for accurate scalar scoring and a Process Explanation Model (PEM) for generating natural language explanations, enabling step refinement. During post-training, it utilizes Monte Carlo Tree Search guided by Trustworthy Process Rewarding to collect high-quality step-level preference data, optimized through Iterative Preference Optimization. ReARTeR addresses three core challenges: (1) misalignment between PRM and PEM, tackled through off-policy preference learning; (2) bias in PRM training data, mitigated by balanced annotation methods and stronger annotations for challenging examples; and (3) early-step bias in PRM, resolved through a temporal-difference-based look-ahead search strategy. Experimental results on multi-step reasoning benchmarks demonstrate significant improvements, underscoring ReARTeR's potential to advance the reasoning capabilities of RAG systems.

Deep Learning (DL) is increasingly being integrated into Web applications through a method known as "in-browser inference", where the DL processes occur directly within Web browsers. However, the actual performance of this method and its effect on user experience quality (QoE) is not well-understood. This gap in knowledge necessitates new forms of QoE measurement, going beyond traditional metrics such as page load time. To address this, we conducted the first extensive performance evaluation of in-browser inference. We introduced new metrics for this purpose: responsiveness, smoothness, and inference accuracy. Our thorough study included 9 widely-used DL models and tested them across 50 popular PC Web browsers. The findings show a significant latency issue with in-browser inference: it's on average 16.9 times slower on CPU and 4.9 times slower on GPU than native inference methods. Several factors contribute to this latency, including underused hardware instruction sets, inherent delays in the runtime environment, resource competition within the browser, and inefficiencies in software libraries and GPU abstractions. Moreover, in-browser inference demands a lot of memory, sometimes up to 334.6 times more than the size of the DL models themselves. This excessive memory usage is partly due to suboptimal memory management. Additionally, we noticed that in-browser inference increases the time it takes for graphical user interface (GUI) components to load in web browsers by a significant 67.2\%, which severely impacts the overall QoE for users of web applications that depend on this technology.

In the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence (AI), a paradigm shift is underway. We are witnessing the transition from specialized, fragmented deep learning models to versatile, one-size-fits-all foundation models. These advanced AI systems are capable of operating in an open-world context, interacting with open vocabularies and image pixels for unseen AI tasks, i.e., zero-shot abilities. They are exemplified by (1) Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPTs [39] that can ingest almost every NLP task in the form as a prompt; (2) Vision Transformers Models (ViTs) such as Masked Autoencoder [133] that can handle various downstream vision tasks; (3) Latent Diffusion Models (LDMs) such as Stable Diffusion [310] that generate high-quality images with arbitrary text-based prompts; (4) Multimodal models such as CLIP [296] and ImageBind [116] that map different modal data into the same latent space and are widely used as backbone for cross-modality tasks like image retrieval/search and visual-question answering. Such flexibility and generality marks a significant departure from the earlier era of AI, setting a new standard for how AI interfaces with the world. The success of these foundation models is deeply rooted in their scalability: unlike their predecessors, these models' accuracy and generalization ability can continuously expand with more data or parameters, without altering the underlying simple algorithms and architectures.

We study the combinatorial sleeping multi-armed semi-bandit problem with long-term fairness constraints~(CSMAB-F). To address the problem, we adopt Thompson Sampling~(TS) to maximize the total rewards and use virtual queue techniques to handle the fairness constraints, and design an algorithm called \emph{TS with beta priors and Bernoulli likelihoods for CSMAB-F~(TSCSF-B)}. Further, we prove TSCSF-B can satisfy the fairness constraints, and the time-averaged regret is upper bounded by $\frac{N}{2\eta} + O\left(\frac{\sqrt{mNT\ln T}}{T}\right)$, where $N$ is the total number of arms, $m$ is the maximum number of arms that can be pulled simultaneously in each round~(the cardinality constraint) and $\eta$ is the parameter trading off fairness for rewards. By relaxing the fairness constraints (i.e., let $\eta \rightarrow \infty$), the bound boils down to the first problem-independent bound of TS algorithms for combinatorial sleeping multi-armed semi-bandit problems. Finally, we perform numerical experiments and use a high-rating movie recommendation application to show the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed algorithm.