Nonlinear filtering can solve very complex problems, but typically involve very time consuming calculations. Here we show that for filters that are constructed as a RBF network with Gaussian basis functions, a decomposition into linear filters exists, which can be computed efficiently in the frequency domain, yielding dramatic improvement in speed. We present an application of this idea to image processing. In electron micrograph images of photoreceptor terminals of the fruit fly, Drosophila, synaptic vesicles containing neurotransmitter should be detected and labeled automatically. We use hand labels, provided by human experts, to learn a RBF filter using Support Vector Regression with Gaussian kernels. We will show that the resulting nonlinear filter solves the task to a degree of accuracy, which is close to what can be achieved by human experts. This allows the very time consuming task of data evaluation to be done efficiently.

The most simple filter is linear mapping.

There are two linear transformations to be considered, one operating inside the channels (0) and one operating between the different channels (W). The two transformations are estimated in two adjacent leA steps. There are mainly two advantages, that can be taken from the first transformation: (i) By arranging independence among the columns of the transformed patches, the average transinformation between different channels is decreased.

There are two linear transformations to be considered, one operating inside the channels (0) and one operating between the different channels (W). The two transformations are estimated in two adjacent leA steps. There are mainly two advantages, that can be taken from the first transformation: (i) By arranging independence among the columns of the transformed patches, the average transinformation between different channels is decreased.

There are two linear transformations to be considered, one operating inside thechannels (0) and one operating between the different channels (W). The two transformations are estimated in two adjacent leA steps. There are mainly two advantages, that can be taken from the first transformation: (i) By arranging independence among the columns of the transformed patches, the average transinformation betweendifferent channels is decreased.