Not enough data to create a plot.
Try a different view from the menu above.
Thomaz, Andrea
SiRoK: Situated Robot Knowledge - Understanding the Balance Between Situated Knowledge and Variability
Daruna, Angel Andres (Institute for Robotics and Intelligent Machines, Georgia Institute of Technology) | Chu, Vivian (Institute for Robotics and Intelligent Machines, Georgia Institute of Technology) | Liu, Weiyu (Institute for Robotics and Intelligent Machines, Georgia Institute of Technology) | Hahn, Meera (Institute for Robotics and Intelligent Machines, Georgia Institute of Technology) | Khante, Priyanka (The University of Texas at Austin) | Chernova, Sonia (Institute for Robotics and Intelligent Machines, Georgia Institute of Technology) | Thomaz, Andrea (The University of Texas at Austin)
General-purpose robots operating in a variety of environments, such as homes or hospitals, require a way to integrate abstract knowledge that is generalizable across domains with local, domain-specific observations. In this work, we examine different types and sources of data, with the goal of understanding how locally observed data and abstract knowledge might be fused.We introduce the Situated Robot Knowledge (SiRoK) framework that integrates probabilistic abstract knowledge and semantic memory of the local environment. In a series of robot and simulation experiments we examine the tradeoffs in the reliability and generalization of both data sources. Our robot experiments show that the variability of object properties and locations in our knowledge base is indicative of the time it takes to generalize a concept and its validity in the real world. The results of our simulations back that of our robot experiments, and give us insights into which source of knowledge to use for 31 types of object classes that exist in the real world.
Reports on the 2014 AAAI Fall Symposium Series
Cohen, Adam B. (Independent Consultant) | Chernova, Sonia (Worcester Polytechnic Institute) | Giordano, James (Georgetown University Medical Center) | Guerin, Frank (University of Aberdeen) | Hauser, Kris (Duke University) | Indurkhya, Bipin (AGH University of Science and Technology) | Leonetti, Matteo (University of Texas at Austin) | Medsker, Larry (Siena College) | Michalowski, Martin (Adventium Labs) | Sonntag, Daniel (German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence) | Stojanov, Georgi (American University of Paris) | Tecuci, Dan G. (IBM Watson, Austin) | Thomaz, Andrea (Georgia Institute of Technology) | Veale, Tony (University College Dublin) | Waltinger, Ulli (Siemens Corporate Technology)
The AAAI 2014 Fall Symposium Series was held Thursday through Saturday, November 13โ15, at the Westin Arlington Gateway in Arlington, Virginia adjacent to Washington, DC. The titles of the seven symposia were Artificial Intelligence for Human-Robot Interaction, Energy Market Prediction, Expanding the Boundaries of Health Informatics Using AI, Knowledge, Skill, and Behavior Transfer in Autonomous Robots, Modeling Changing Perspectives: Reconceptualizing Sensorimotor Experiences, Natural Language Access to Big Data, and The Nature of Humans and Machines: A Multidisciplinary Discourse. The highlights of each symposium are presented in this report.
Reports on the 2014 AAAI Fall Symposium Series
Cohen, Adam B. (Independent Consultant) | Chernova, Sonia (Worcester Polytechnic Institute) | Giordano, James (Georgetown University Medical Center) | Guerin, Frank (University of Aberdeen) | Hauser, Kris (Duke University) | Indurkhya, Bipin (AGH University of Science and Technology) | Leonetti, Matteo (University of Texas at Austin) | Medsker, Larry (Siena College) | Michalowski, Martin (Adventium Labs) | Sonntag, Daniel (German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence) | Stojanov, Georgi (American University of Paris) | Tecuci, Dan G. (IBM Watson, Austin) | Thomaz, Andrea (Georgia Institute of Technology) | Veale, Tony (University College Dublin) | Waltinger, Ulli (Siemens Corporate Technology)
The program also included six keynote presentations, a funding panel, a community panel, and multiple breakout sessions. The keynote presentations, given by speakers that have been working on AI for HRI for many years, focused on the larger intellectual picture of this subfield. Each speaker was asked to address, from his or her personal perspective, why HRI is an AI problem and how AI research can bring us closer to the reality of humans interacting with robots on everyday tasks. Speakers included Rodney Brooks (Rethink Robotics), Manuela Veloso (Carnegie Mellon University), Michael Goodrich (Brigham Young University), Benjamin Kuipers (University of Michigan), Maja Mataric (University of Southern California), and Brian Scassellati (Yale University).
An HRI Approach to Learning from Demonstration
Akgun, Baris (Georgia Institute of Technology) | Bullard, Kalesha (Georgia Institute of Technology) | Chu, Vivian (Georgia Institute of Technology) | Thomaz, Andrea (Georgia Institute of Technology)
The goal of this research is to enable robots to learn new things from everyday people. For years, the AI and Robotics community has sought to enable robots to efficiently learn new skills from a knowledgeable human trainer, and prior work has focused on several important technical problems. This vast amount of research in the field of robot Learning by Demonstration has by and large only been evaluated with expert humans, typically the system's designer. Thus, neglecting a key point that this interaction takes place within a social structure that can guide and constrain the learning problem. %Moreover, we We believe that addressing this point will be essential for developing systems that can learn from everyday people that are not experts in Machine Learning or Robotics. Our work focuses on new research questions involved in letting robots learn from everyday human partners (e.g., What kind of input do people want to provide a machine learner? How does their mental model of the learning process affect this input? What interfaces and interaction mechanisms can help people provide better input from a machine learning perspective?) Often our research begins with an investigation into the feasibility of a particular machine learning interaction, which leads to a series of research questions around re-designing both the interaction and the algorithm to better suit learning with end-users. We believe this equal focus on both the Machine Learning and the HRI contributions are key to making progress toward the goal of machines learning from humans. In this abstract we briefly overview four different projects that highlight our HRI approach to the problem of Learning from Demonstration.