In robotics and other control applications it is commonplace to have a preexisting setof controllers for solving subtasks, perhaps handcrafted or previously learned or planned, and still face a difficult problem of how to choose and switch among the controllers to solve an overall task as well as possible. In this paper we present a framework based on Markov decision processes and semi-Markov decision processes for phrasing this problem, a basic theorem regarding the improvement in performance that can be obtained byswitching flexibly between given controllers, and example applications ofthe theorem. In particular, we show how an agent can plan with these high-level controllers and then use the results of such planning to find an even better plan, by modifying the existing controllers, with negligible additional cost and no re-planning. In one of our examples, the complexity of the problem is reduced from 24 billion state-action pairs to less than a million state-controller pairs. In many applications, solutions to parts of a task are known, either because they were handcrafted bypeople or because they were previously learned or planned. For example, in robotics applications, there may exist controllers for moving joints to positions, picking up objects, controlling eye movements, or navigating along hallways. More generally, an intelligent systemmay have available to it several temporally extended courses of action to choose from. In such cases, a key challenge is to take full advantage of the existing temporally extended actions,to choose or switch among them effectively, and to plan at their level rather than at the level of individual actions.

In this paper, we address two issues of longstanding interest in the reinforcement learningliterature. First, what kinds of performance guarantees can be made for Q-learning after only a finite number of actions? Second, what quantitative comparisons can be made between Q-learning and model-based (indirect) approaches, which use experience to estimate next-state distributions for off-line value iteration? We first show that both Q-learning and the indirect approach enjoy rather rapid convergence to the optimal policy as a function of the number ofstate transitions observed.

Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (pO"MOPs) constitute an important class of reinforcement learning problems which present unique theoretical and computational difficulties. In the absence of the Markov property, popular reinforcement learning algorithms such as Q-Iearning may no longer be effective, and memory-based methods which remove partial observability via state-estimation are notoriously expensive. An alternative approach is to seek a stochastic memoryless policy which for each observation of the environment prescribes a probability distribution over available actions that maximizes the average reward per timestep. A reinforcement learning algorithm which learns a locally optimal stochastic memoryless policy has been proposed by Jaakkola, Singh and Jordan, but not empirically verified. We present a variation of this algorithm, discuss its implementation, and demonstrate its viability using four test problems.

This paper examines the application of reinforcement learning to a telecommunications networking problem. The problem requires that revenue bemaximized while simultaneously meeting a quality of service constraint that forbids entry into certain states. We present a general solution to this multi-criteria problem that is able to earn significantly higher revenues than alternatives.

Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (pO "MOPs) constitute an important class of reinforcement learning problems which present unique theoretical and computational difficulties. In the absence of the Markov property, popular reinforcement learning algorithms such as Q-Iearning may no longer be effective, and memory-based methods which remove partial observability via state-estimation are notoriously expensive. An alternative approach is to seek a stochastic memoryless policy which for each observation of the environment prescribes a probability distribution over available actions that maximizes the average reward per timestep. A reinforcement learning algorithm which learns a locally optimal stochastic memoryless policy has been proposed by Jaakkola, Singh and Jordan, but not empirically verified. We present a variation of this algorithm, discuss its implementation, and demonstrate its viability using four test problems.

In this paper, we address two issues of longstanding interest in the reinforcement learning literature. First, what kinds of performance guarantees can be made for Q-learning after only a finite number of actions? Second, what quantitative comparisons can be made between Q-learning and model-based (indirect) approaches, which use experience to estimate next-state distributions for off-line value iteration? We first show that both Q-learning and the indirect approach enjoy rather rapid convergence to the optimal policy as a function of the number of state transitions observed.

This paper examines the application of reinforcement learning to a telecommunications networking problem. The problem requires that revenue be maximized while simultaneously meeting a quality of service constraint that forbids entry into certain states. We present a general solution to this multi-criteria problem that is able to earn significantly higher revenues than alternatives.

In robotics and other control applications it is commonplace to have a preexisting set of controllers for solving subtasks, perhaps handcrafted or previously learned or planned, and still face a difficult problem of how to choose and switch among the controllers to solve an overall task as well as possible. In this paper we present a framework based on Markov decision processes and semi-Markov decision processes for phrasing this problem, a basic theorem regarding the improvement in performance that can be obtained by switching flexibly between given controllers, and example applications of the theorem. In particular, we show how an agent can plan with these high-level controllers and then use the results of such planning to find an even better plan, by modifying the existing controllers, with negligible additional cost and no re-planning. In one of our examples, the complexity of the problem is reduced from 24 billion state-action pairs to less than a million state-controller pairs. In many applications, solutions to parts of a task are known, either because they were handcrafted by people or because they were previously learned or planned. For example, in robotics applications, there may exist controllers for moving joints to positions, picking up objects, controlling eye movements, or navigating along hallways. More generally, an intelligent system may have available to it several temporally extended courses of action to choose from. In such cases, a key challenge is to take full advantage of the existing temporally extended actions, to choose or switch among them effectively, and to plan at their level rather than at the level of individual actions.

We are frequently called upon to perform multiple tasks that compete forour attention and resource. Often we know the optimal solution to each task in isolation; in this paper, we describe how this knowledge can be exploited to efficiently find good solutions for doing the tasks in parallel. We formulate this problem as that of dynamically merging multiple Markov decision processes (MDPs) into a composite MDP, and present a new theoretically-sound dynamic programmingalgorithm for finding an optimal policy for the composite MDP. We analyze various aspects of our algorithm and illustrate its use on a simple merging problem. Every day, we are faced with the problem of doing mUltiple tasks in parallel, each of which competes for our attention and resource. If we are running a job shop, we must decide which machines to allocate to which jobs, and in what order, so that no jobs miss their deadlines. If we are a mail delivery robot, we must find the intended recipients of the mail while simultaneously avoiding fixed obstacles (such as walls) and mobile obstacles (such as people), and still manage to keep ourselves sufficiently charged up. Frequently we know how to perform each task in isolation; this paper considers how we can take the information we have about the individual tasks and combine it to efficiently find an optimal solution for doing the entire set of tasks in parallel. More importantly, we describe a theoretically-sound algorithm for doing this merging dynamically; new tasks (such as a new job arrival at a job shop) can be assimilated online into the solution being found for the ongoing set of simultaneous tasks.

We are frequently called upon to perform multiple tasks that compete for our attention and resource. Often we know the optimal solution to each task in isolation; in this paper, we describe how this knowledge can be exploited to efficiently find good solutions for doing the tasks in parallel. We formulate this problem as that of dynamically merging multiple Markov decision processes (MDPs) into a composite MDP, and present a new theoretically-sound dynamic programming algorithm for finding an optimal policy for the composite MDP. We analyze various aspects of our algorithm and illustrate its use on a simple merging problem. Every day, we are faced with the problem of doing mUltiple tasks in parallel, each of which competes for our attention and resource. If we are running a job shop, we must decide which machines to allocate to which jobs, and in what order, so that no jobs miss their deadlines. If we are a mail delivery robot, we must find the intended recipients of the mail while simultaneously avoiding fixed obstacles (such as walls) and mobile obstacles (such as people), and still manage to keep ourselves sufficiently charged up. Frequently we know how to perform each task in isolation; this paper considers how we can take the information we have about the individual tasks and combine it to efficiently find an optimal solution for doing the entire set of tasks in parallel. More importantly, we describe a theoretically-sound algorithm for doing this merging dynamically; new tasks (such as a new job arrival at a job shop) can be assimilated online into the solution being found for the ongoing set of simultaneous tasks.