For distributed machine learning with sensitive data, we demonstrate how minimizing distance correlation between raw data and intermediary representations reduces leakage of sensitive raw data patterns across client communications while maintaining model accuracy. Leakage (measured using distance correlation between input and intermediate representations) is the risk associated with the invertibility of raw data from intermediary representations. This can prevent client entities that hold sensitive data from using distributed deep learning services. We demonstrate that our method is resilient to such reconstruction attacks and is based on reduction of distance correlation between raw data and learned representations during training and inference with image datasets. We prevent such reconstruction of raw data while maintaining information required to sustain good classification accuracies.

In this work, we introduce SplitNN-driven Vertical Partitioning, a configuration of a distributed deep learning method called SplitNN to facilitate learning from vertically distributed features. SplitNN does not share raw data or model details with collaborating institutions. The proposed configuration allows training among institutions holding diverse sources of data without the need of complex encryption algorithms or secure computation protocols. We evaluate several configurations to merge the outputs of the split models, and compare performance and resource efficiency. The method is flexible and allows many different configurations to tackle the specific challenges posed by vertically split datasets.

In this paper we investigate the usage of adversarial perturbations for the purpose of privacy from human perception and model (machine) based detection. We employ adversarial perturbations for obfuscating certain variables in raw data while preserving the rest. Current adversarial perturbation methods are used for data poisoning with minimal perturbations of the raw data such that the machine learning model's performance is adversely impacted while the human vision cannot perceive the difference in the poisoned dataset due to minimal nature of perturbations. We instead apply relatively maximal perturbations of raw data to conditionally damage model's classification of one attribute while preserving the model performance over another attribute. In addition, the maximal nature of perturbation helps adversely impact human perception in classifying hidden attribute apart from impacting model performance. We validate our result qualitatively by showing the obfuscated dataset and quantitatively by showing the inability of models trained on clean data to predict the hidden attribute from the perturbed dataset while being able to predict the rest of attributes.

We compare communication efficiencies of two compelling distributed machine learning approaches of split learning and federated learning. We show useful settings under which each method outperforms the other in terms of communication efficiency. We consider various practical scenarios of distributed learning setup and juxtapose the two methods under various real-life scenarios. We consider settings of small and large number of clients as well as small models (1M - 6M parameters), large models (10M - 200M parameters) and very large models (1 Billion-100 Billion parameters). We show that increasing number of clients or increasing model size favors split learning setup over the federated while increasing the number of data samples while keeping the number of clients or model size low makes federated learning more communication efficient.