Not enough data to create a plot.
Try a different view from the menu above.
Schneider, Jan David
Inspect, Understand, Overcome: A Survey of Practical Methods for AI Safety
Houben, Sebastian, Abrecht, Stephanie, Akila, Maram, Bär, Andreas, Brockherde, Felix, Feifel, Patrick, Fingscheidt, Tim, Gannamaneni, Sujan Sai, Ghobadi, Seyed Eghbal, Hammam, Ahmed, Haselhoff, Anselm, Hauser, Felix, Heinzemann, Christian, Hoffmann, Marco, Kapoor, Nikhil, Kappel, Falk, Klingner, Marvin, Kronenberger, Jan, Küppers, Fabian, Löhdefink, Jonas, Mlynarski, Michael, Mock, Michael, Mualla, Firas, Pavlitskaya, Svetlana, Poretschkin, Maximilian, Pohl, Alexander, Ravi-Kumar, Varun, Rosenzweig, Julia, Rottmann, Matthias, Rüping, Stefan, Sämann, Timo, Schneider, Jan David, Schulz, Elena, Schwalbe, Gesina, Sicking, Joachim, Srivastava, Toshika, Varghese, Serin, Weber, Michael, Wirkert, Sebastian, Wirtz, Tim, Woehrle, Matthias
The use of deep neural networks (DNNs) in safety-critical applications like mobile health and autonomous driving is challenging due to numerous model-inherent shortcomings. These shortcomings are diverse and range from a lack of generalization over insufficient interpretability to problems with malicious inputs. Cyber-physical systems employing DNNs are therefore likely to suffer from safety concerns. In recent years, a zoo of state-of-the-art techniques aiming to address these safety concerns has emerged. This work provides a structured and broad overview of them. We first identify categories of insufficiencies to then describe research activities aiming at their detection, quantification, or mitigation. Our paper addresses both machine learning experts and safety engineers: The former ones might profit from the broad range of machine learning topics covered and discussions on limitations of recent methods. The latter ones might gain insights into the specifics of modern ML methods. We moreover hope that our contribution fuels discussions on desiderata for ML systems and strategies on how to propel existing approaches accordingly.
Street-Map Based Validation of Semantic Segmentation in Autonomous Driving
von Rueden, Laura, Wirtz, Tim, Hueger, Fabian, Schneider, Jan David, Piatkowski, Nico, Bauckhage, Christian
Artificial intelligence for autonomous driving must meet strict requirements on safety and robustness, which motivates the thorough validation of learned models. However, current validation approaches mostly require ground truth data and are thus both cost-intensive and limited in their applicability. We propose to overcome these limitations by a model agnostic validation using a-priori knowledge from street maps. In particular, we show how to validate semantic segmentation masks and demonstrate the potential of our approach using OpenStreetMap. We introduce validation metrics that indicate false positive or negative road segments. Besides the validation approach, we present a method to correct the vehicle's GPS position so that a more accurate localization can be used for the street-map based validation. Lastly, we present quantitative results on the Cityscapes dataset indicating that our validation approach can indeed uncover errors in semantic segmentation masks.
Towards Map-Based Validation of Semantic Segmentation Masks
von Rueden, Laura, Wirtz, Tim, Hueger, Fabian, Schneider, Jan David, Bauckhage, Christian
Artificial intelligence for autonomous driving must meet strict requirements on safety and robustness. We propose to validate machine learning models for self-driving vehicles not only with given ground truth labels, but also with additional a-priori knowledge. In particular, we suggest to validate the drivable area in semantic segmentation masks using given street map data. We present first results, which indicate that prediction errors can be uncovered by map-based validation.