Risk assessment is a central element for the development and validation of Autonomous Vehicles (AV). It comprises a combination of occurrence probability and severity of future critical events. Time Headway (TH) as well as Time-To-Contact (TTC) are commonly used risk metrics and have qualitative relations to occurrence probability. However, they lack theoretical derivations and additionally they are designed to only cover special types of traffic scenarios (e.g. following between single car pairs). In this paper, we present a probabilistic situation risk model based on survival analysis considerations and extend it to naturally incorporate sensory, temporal and behavioral uncertainties as they arise in real-world scenarios. The resulting Risk Spot Detector (RSD) is applied and tested on naturalistic driving data of a multi-lane boulevard with several intersections, enabling the visualization of road criticality maps. Compared to TH and TTC, our approach is more selective and specific in predicting risk. RSD concentrates on driving sections of high vehicle density where large accelerations and decelerations or approaches with high velocity occur.

We consider the problem of correct motion planning for T-intersection merge-ins of arbitrary geometry and vehicle density. A merge-in support system has to estimate the chances that a gap between two consecutive vehicles can be taken successfully. In contrast to previous models based on heuristic gap size rules, we present an approach which optimizes the integral risk of the situation using parametrized velocity ramps. It accounts for the risks from curves and all involved vehicles (front and rear on all paths) with a so-called survival analysis. For comparison, we also introduce a specially designed extension of the Intelligent Driver Model (IDM) for entering intersections. We show in a quantitative statistical evaluation that the survival method provides advantages in terms of lower absolute risk (i.e., no crash happens) and better risk-utility tradeoff (i.e., making better use of appearing gaps). Furthermore, our approach generalizes to more complex situations with additional risk sources.