Speech processing systems rely on robust feature extraction to handle phonetic and semantic variations found in natural language. While techniques exist for desensitizing features to common noise patterns produced by Speech-to-Text (STT) and Text-to-Speech (TTS) systems, the question remains how to best leverage state-of-the-art language models (which capture rich semantic features, but are trained on only written text) on inputs with ASR errors. In this paper, we present Telephonetic, a data augmentation framework that helps robustify language model features to ASR corrupted inputs. To capture phonetic alterations, we employ a character-level language model trained using probabilistic masking. Phonetic augmentations are generated in two stages: a TTS encoder (Tacotron 2, WaveGlow) and a STT decoder (DeepSpeech). Similarly, semantic perturbations are produced by sampling from nearby words in an embedding space, which is computed using the BERT language model. Words are selected for augmentation according to a hierarchical grammar sampling strategy. Telephonetic is evaluated on the Penn Treebank (PTB) corpus, and demonstrates its effectiveness as a bootstrapping technique for transferring neural language models to the speech domain. Notably, our language model achieves a test perplexity of 37.49 on PTB, which to our knowledge is state-of-the-art among models trained only on PTB.

We propose an adversarial learning approach to the generation of multi-turn dialogue responses. Our proposed framework, hredGAN, is based on conditional generative adversarial networks (GANs). The GAN's generator is a modified hierarchical recurrent encoder-decoder network (HRED) and the discriminator is a word-level bidirectional RNN that shares context and word embedding with the generator. During inference, noise samples conditioned on the dialogue history are used to perturb the generator's latent space to generate several possible responses. The final response is the one ranked best by the discriminator. The hredGAN shows major advantages over existing methods: (1) it generalizes better than networks trained using only the log-likelihood criterion, and (2) it generates longer, more informative and more diverse responses with high utterance and topic relevance even with limited training data. This superiority is demonstrated on the Movie triples and Ubuntu dialogue datasets in terms of perplexity, BLEU, ROUGE and Distinct n-gram scores.

Narratives are ubiquitous in human experience. We use them - What comprises the set of possible narrative arcs? Is there to educate, communicate, convince, explain, and entertain. How many possible story lines are there? Is As far as we know, every society in the world has narratives, there a recipe (à la Joseph Campbell or Vladimir Propp) which suggests they are rooted in our psychology and serve for generating narratives? an important cognitive function: that narratives do something - What are the appropriate representations of narrative?