It is well known that a given cortical neuron can respond with a different firing pattern for the same synaptic input, depending on its firing history and on the effects of modulator transmitters (see [Connors and Gutnick, 1990] for a review). The time span of different channel conductances is very broad, and the influence of some ionic currents varies with the history of the membrane potential [Lytton, 1991]. Motivated by the history-dependent nature of neuronal firing, we continue.our

It is well known that a given cortical neuron can respond with a different firing pattern forthe same synaptic input, depending on its firing history and on the effects of modulator transmitters (see [Connors and Gutnick, 1990] for a review). The time span of different channel conductances is very broad, and the influence of some ionic currents varies with the history of the membrane potential [Lytton, 1991]. Motivated bythe history-dependent nature of neuronal firing, we continue .our

It is well known that a given cortical neuron can respond with a different firing pattern for the same synaptic input, depending on its firing history and on the effects of modulator transmitters (see [Connors and Gutnick, 1990] for a review). The time span of different channel conductances is very broad, and the influence of some ionic currents varies with the history of the membrane potential [Lytton, 1991]. Motivated by the history-dependent nature of neuronal firing, we continue.our

We present a methodological framework enabling a detailed description ofthe performance of Hopfield-like attractor neural networks (ANN) in the first two iterations. Using the Bayesian approach, wefind that performance is improved when a history-based term is included in the neuron's dynamics. A further enhancement of the network's performance is achieved by judiciously choosing the censored neurons (those which become active in a given iteration) onthe basis of the magnitude of their post-synaptic potentials. Thecontribution of biologically plausible, censored, historydependent dynamicsis especially marked in conditions of low firing activity and sparse connectivity, two important characteristics of the mammalian cortex. In such networks, the performance attained ishigher than the performance of two'independent' iterations, whichrepresents an upper bound on the performance of history-independent networks.

Isaac Meilijson EytanRuppin Moshe Sipper School of Mathematical Sciences Raymond and Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences Tel Aviv University, 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel Abstract We analyze in detail the performance of a Hamming network classifying inputsthat are distorted versions of one of its m stored memory patterns. The activation function of the memory neurons in the original Hamming network is replaced by a simple threshold function. The THN drastically reduces the time and space complexity of Hamming Network classifiers. 1 Introduction Originally presented in (Steinbuch 1961, Taylor 1964) the Hamming network (HN) has received renewed attention in recent years (Lippmann et. The HN calculates the Hamming distance between the input pattern and each memory pattern, and selects the memory with the smallest distance. It is composed of two subnets: The similarity subnet, consisting of an n-neuron input layer connected with an m-neuron memory layer, calculates the number of equal bits between the input and each memory pattern.

The HN calculates the Hamming distance between the input pattern and each memory pattern, and selects the memory with the smallest distance. It is composed of two subnets: The similarity subnet, consisting of an n-neuron input layer connected with an m-neuron memory layer, calculates the number of equal bits between the input and each memory pattern. The winner-take-all (WTA) subnet, consisting of a fully connected m-neuron topology, selects the memory neuron that best matches the input pattern.

We present a methodological framework enabling a detailed description of the performance of Hopfield-like attractor neural networks (ANN) in the first two iterations. Using the Bayesian approach, we find that performance is improved when a history-based term is included in the neuron's dynamics. A further enhancement of the network's performance is achieved by judiciously choosing the censored neurons (those which become active in a given iteration) on the basis of the magnitude of their post-synaptic potentials. The contribution of biologically plausible, censored, historydependent dynamics is especially marked in conditions of low firing activity and sparse connectivity, two important characteristics of the mammalian cortex. In such networks, the performance attained is higher than the performance of two'independent' iterations, which represents an upper bound on the performance of history-independent networks.