Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Maier, Andreas


Dilated deeply supervised networks for hippocampus segmentation in MRI

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Tissue loss in the hippocampi has been heavily correlated with the progression of Alzheimer's Disease (AD). The shape and structure of the hippocampus are important factors in terms of early AD diagnosis and prognosis by clinicians. However, manual segmentation of such subcortical structures in MR studies is a challenging and subjective task. In this paper, we investigate variants of the well known 3D U-Net, a type of convolution neural network (CNN) for semantic segmentation tasks. We propose an alternative form of the 3D U-Net, which uses dilated convolutions and deep supervision to incorporate multi-scale information into the model. The proposed method is evaluated on the task of hippocampus head and body segmentation in an MRI dataset, provided as part of the MICCAI 2018 segmentation decathlon challenge. The experimental results show that our approach outperforms other conventional methods in terms of different segmentation accuracy metrics.


Field of Interest Prediction for Computer-Aided Mitotic Count

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Manual counts of mitotic figures, which are determined in the tumor region with the highest mitotic activity, are a key parameter of most tumor grading schemes. It is however strongly dependent on the area selection. To reduce potential variability of prognosis due to this, we propose to use an algorithmic field of interest prediction to assess the area of highest mitotic activity in a whole-slide image. Methods: We evaluated two state-of-the-art methods, all based on the use of deep convolutional neural networks on their ability to predict the mitotic count in digital histopathology slides. We evaluated them on a novel dataset of 32 completely annotated whole slide images from canine cutaneous mast cell tumors (CMCT) and one publicly available human mamma carcinoma (HMC) dataset. We first compared the mitotic counts (MC) predicted by the two models with the ground truth MC on both data sets. Second, for the CMCT data set, we compared the computationally predicted position and MC of the area of highest mitotic activity with size-equivalent areas selected by eight veterinary pathologists. Results: We found a high correlation between the mitotic count as predicted by the models (Pearson's correlation coefficient between 0.931 and 0.962 for the CMCT data set and between 0.801 and 0.986 for the HMC data set) on the slides. For the CMCT data set, this is also reflected in the predicted position representing mitotic counts in mostly the upper quartile of the slide's ground truth MC distribution. Further, we found strong differences between experts in position selection. Conclusion: While the mitotic counts in areas selected by the experts substantially varied, both algorithmic approaches were consistently able to generate a good estimate of the area of highest mitotic count. To achieve better inter-rater agreement, we propose to use computer-based area selection for manual mitotic count.


Deep Learning for Sampling from Arbitrary Probability Distributions

arXiv.org Machine Learning

This paper proposes a fully connected neural network model to map samples from a uniform distribution to samples of any explicitly known probability density function. During the training, the Jensen-Shannon divergence between the distribution of the model's output and the target distribution is minimized. We experimentally demonstrate that our model converges towards the desired state. It provides an alternative to existing sampling methods such as inversion sampling, rejection sampling, Gaussian mixture models and Markov-Chain-Monte-Carlo. Our model has high sampling efficiency and is easily applied to any probability distribution, without the need of further analytical or numerical calculations. It can produce correlated samples, such that the output distribution converges faster towards the target than for independent samples. But it is also able to produce independent samples, if single values are fed into the network and the input values are independent as well. We focus on one-dimensional sampling, but additionally illustrate a two-dimensional example with a target distribution of dependent variables.