In a recent article [1], Brette argues that coding as a concept is inappropriate for explanations of neurocognitive phenomena. Here, we argue that Brette's conceptual analysis mischaracterizes the structure of causal claims in coding and other forms of analysis-by-decomposition. We argue that analyses of this form are permissible, conceptually coherent, and offer essential tools for building and developing models of neurocognitive systems like the brain. Brette identifies three properties of coding: correspondence, representation, and causality. Brette grants correspondence but rejects both representation and causality for the neural code. While we disagree with his analyses of representation and causality, we limit our critique to the latter.

Real-world image sequences can often be naturally decomposed into a small number of frames depicting interesting, highly stochastic moments (its $\textit{keyframes}$) and the low-variance frames in between them. In image sequences depicting trajectories to a goal, keyframes can be seen as capturing the $\textit{subgoals}$ of the sequence as they depict the high-variance moments of interest that ultimately led to the goal. In this paper, we introduce a video prediction model that discovers the keyframe structure of image sequences in an unsupervised fashion. We do so using a hierarchical Keyframe-Intermediate model (KeyIn) that stochastically predicts keyframes and their offsets in time and then uses these predictions to deterministically predict the intermediate frames. We propose a differentiable formulation of this problem that allows us to train the full hierarchical model using a sequence reconstruction loss. We show that our model is able to find meaningful keyframe structure in a simulated dataset of robotic demonstrations and that these keyframes can serve as subgoals for planning. Our model outperforms other hierarchical prediction approaches for planning on a simulated pushing task.

Recently, much progress has been made building systems that can capture static image properties, but natural environments are intrinsically dynamic. For an intelligent agent, perception is responsible not only for capturing features of scene content, but also capturing its \textit{affordances}: how the state of things can change, especially as the result of the agent's actions. We propose an unsupervised method to learn representations of the sensorimotor affordances of an environment. We do so by learning an embedding for stochastic future prediction that is (i) sensitive to scene dynamics and minimally sensitive to static scene content and (ii) compositional in nature, capturing the fact that changes in the environment can be composed to produce a cumulative change. We show that these two properties are sufficient to induce representations that are reusable across visually distinct scenes that share degrees of freedom. We show the applicability of our method to synthetic settings and its potential for understanding more complex, realistic visual settings.