Transformations in the input space of Deep Neural Networks (DNN) lead to unintended changes in the feature space. Almost perceptually identical inputs, such as adversarial examples, can have significantly distant feature representations. On the contrary, Out-of-Distribution (OOD) samples can have highly similar feature representations to training set samples. Our theoretical analysis for DNNs trained with a categorical classification head suggests that the inflexible logit space restricted by the classification problem size is one of the root causes for the lack of $\textit{robustness}$. Our second observation is that DNNs over-fit to the training augmentation technique and do not learn $\textit{nuance invariant}$ representations. Inspired by the recent success of prototypical and contrastive learning frameworks for both improving robustness and learning nuance invariant representations, we propose a training framework, $\textbf{Supervised Contrastive Prototype Learning}$ (SCPL). We use N-pair contrastive loss with prototypes of the same and opposite classes and replace a categorical classification head with a $\textbf{Prototype Classification Head}$ (PCH). Our approach is $\textit{sample efficient}$, does not require $\textit{sample mining}$, can be implemented on any existing DNN without modification to their architecture, and combined with other training augmentation techniques. We empirically evaluate the $\textbf{clean}$ robustness of our method on out-of-distribution and adversarial samples. Our framework outperforms other state-of-the-art contrastive and prototype learning approaches in $\textit{robustness}$.

Learning the causal structure behind data is invaluable for improving generalization and obtaining high-quality explanations. We propose a novel framework, Invariant Structure Learning (ISL), that is designed to improve causal structure discovery by utilizing generalization as an indication. ISL splits the data into different environments, and learns a structure that is invariant to the target across different environments by imposing a consistency constraint. An aggregation mechanism then selects the optimal classifier based on a graph structure that reflects the causal mechanisms in the data more accurately compared to the structures learnt from individual environments. Furthermore, we extend ISL to a self-supervised learning setting where accurate causal structure discovery does not rely on any labels. This self-supervised ISL utilizes invariant causality proposals by iteratively setting different nodes as targets. On synthetic and real-world datasets, we demonstrate that ISL accurately discovers the causal structure, outperforms alternative methods, and yields superior generalization for datasets with significant distribution shifts.

Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is a well-studied topic in supervised learning. Extending the successes in supervised learning methods to the reinforcement learning (RL) setting, however, is difficult due to the data generating process - RL agents actively query their environment for data, and the data are a function of the policy followed by the agent. An agent could thus neglect a shift in the environment if its policy did not lead it to explore the aspect of the environment that shifted. Therefore, to achieve safe and robust generalization in RL, there exists an unmet need for OOD detection through active experimentation. Here, we attempt to bridge this lacuna by first defining a causal framework for OOD scenarios or environments encountered by RL agents in the wild. Then, we propose a novel task: that of Out-of-Task Distribution (OOTD) detection. We introduce an RL agent that actively experiments in a test environment and subsequently concludes whether it is OOTD or not. We name our method GalilAI, in honor of Galileo Galilei, as it discovers, among other causal processes, that gravitational acceleration is independent of the mass of a body. Finally, we propose a simple probabilistic neural network baseline for comparison, which extends extant Model-Based RL. We find that GalilAI outperforms the baseline significantly. See visualizations of our method https://galil-ai.github.io/

Humans excel at learning long-horizon tasks from demonstrations augmented with textual commentary, as evidenced by the burgeoning popularity of tutorial videos online. Intuitively, this capability can be separated into 2 distinct subtasks - first, dividing a long-horizon demonstration sequence into semantically meaningful events; second, adapting such events into meaningful behaviors in one's own environment. Here, we present Video2Skill (V2S), which attempts to extend this capability to artificial agents by allowing a robot arm to learn from human cooking videos. We first use sequence-to-sequence Auto-Encoder style architectures to learn a temporal latent space for events in long-horizon demonstrations. We then transfer these representations to the robotic target domain, using a small amount of offline and unrelated interaction data (sequences of state-action pairs of the robot arm controlled by an expert) to adapt these events into actionable representations, i.e., skills. Through experiments, we demonstrate that our approach results in self-supervised analogy learning, where the agent learns to draw analogies between motions in human demonstration data and behaviors in the robotic environment. We also demonstrate the efficacy of our approach on model learning - demonstrating how Video2Skill utilizes prior knowledge from human demonstration to outperform traditional model learning of long-horizon dynamics. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of our approach for non-tabula rasa decision-making, i.e, utilizing video demonstration for zero-shot skill generation.

Despite substantial progress in applying neural networks (NN) to a wide variety of areas, they still largely suffer from a lack of transparency and interpretability. While recent developments in explainable artificial intelligence attempt to bridge this gap (e.g., by visualizing the correlation between input pixels and final outputs), these approaches are limited to explaining low-level relationships, and crucially, do not provide insights on error correction. In this work, we propose a framework (VRX) to interpret classification NNs with intuitive structural visual concepts. Given a trained classification model, the proposed VRX extracts relevant class-specific visual concepts and organizes them using structural concept graphs (SCG) based on pairwise concept relationships. By means of knowledge distillation, we show VRX can take a step towards mimicking the reasoning process of NNs and provide logical, concept-level explanations for final model decisions. With extensive experiments, we empirically show VRX can meaningfully answer "why" and "why not" questions about the prediction, providing easy-to-understand insights about the reasoning process. We also show that these insights can potentially provide guidance on improving NN's performance.

Supervised deep neural networks are known to undergo a sharp decline in the accuracy of older tasks when new tasks are learned, termed "catastrophic forgetting". Many state-of-the-art solutions to continual learning rely on biasing and/or partitioning a model to accommodate successive tasks incrementally. However, these methods largely depend on the availability of a task-oracle to confer task identities to each test sample, without which the models are entirely unable to perform. To address this shortcoming, we propose and compare several candidate task-assigning mappers which require very little memory overhead: (1) Incremental unsupervised prototype assignment using either nearest means, Gaussian Mixture Models or fuzzy ART backbones; (2) Supervised incremental prototype assignment with fast fuzzy ARTMAP; (3) Shallow perceptron trained via a dynamic coreset. Our proposed model variants are trained either from pre-trained feature extractors or task-dependent feature embeddings of the main classifier network. We apply these pipeline variants to continual learning benchmarks, comprised of either sequences of several datasets or within one single dataset. Overall, these methods, despite their simplicity and compactness, perform very close to a ground truth oracle, especially in experiments of inter-dataset task assignment. Moreover, best-performing variants only impose an average cost of 1.7% parameter memory increase.

Discovering concepts (or temporal abstractions) in an unsupervised manner from demonstration data in the absence of an environment is an important problem. Organizing these discovered concepts hierarchically at different levels of abstraction is useful in discovering patterns, building ontologies, and generating tutorials from demonstration data. However, recent work to discover such concepts without access to any environment does not discover relationships (or a hierarchy) between these discovered concepts. In this paper, we present a Transformer-based concept abstraction architecture UNHCLE (pronounced uncle) that extracts a hierarchy of concepts in an unsupervised way from demonstration data. We empirically demonstrate how UNHCLE discovers meaningful hierarchies using datasets from Chess and Cooking domains. Finally, we show how UNHCLE learns meaningful language labels for concepts by using demonstration data augmented with natural language for cooking and chess. All of our code is available at https://github.com/UNHCLE/UNHCLE

Humans show an innate ability to learn the regularities of the world through interaction. By performing experiments in our environment, we are able to discern the causal factors of variation and infer how they affect the dynamics of our world. Analogously, here we attempt to equip reinforcement learning agents with the ability to perform experiments that facilitate a categorization of the rolled-out trajectories, and to subsequently infer the causal factors of the environment in a hierarchical manner. We introduce a novel intrinsic reward, called causal curiosity, and show that it allows our agents to learn optimal sequences of actions, and to discover causal factors in the dynamics. The learned behavior allows the agent to infer a binary quantized representation for the ground-truth causal factors in every environment. Additionally, we find that these experimental behaviors are semantically meaningful (e.g., to differentiate between heavy and light blocks, our agents learn to lift them), and are learnt in a self-supervised manner with approximately 2.5 times less data than conventional supervised planners. We show that these behaviors can be re-purposed and fine-tuned (e.g., from lifting to pushing or other downstream tasks). Finally, we show that the knowledge of causal factor representations aids zero-shot learning for more complex tasks.

Adversarial training, in which a network is trained on both adversarial and clean examples, is one of the most trusted defense methods against adversarial attacks. However, there are three major practical difficulties in implementing and deploying this method - expensive in terms of running memory and computation costs; accuracy trade-off between clean and adversarial examples; cannot foresee all adversarial attacks at training time. Here, we present a new solution to ease these three difficulties - Beneficial perturbation Networks (BPN). BPN generates and leverages beneficial perturbations (somewhat opposite to well-known adversarial perturbations) as biases within the parameter space of the network, to neutralize the effects of adversarial perturbations on data samples. Thus, BPN can effectively defend against adversarial examples. Compared to adversarial training, we demonstrate that BPN can significantly reduce the required running memory and computation costs, by generating beneficial perturbations through recycling of the gradients computed from training on clean examples. In addition, BPN can alleviate the accuracy trade-off difficulty and the difficulty of foreseeing multiple attacks, by improving the generalization of the network, thanks to increased diversity of the training set achieved through neutralization between adversarial and beneficial perturbations.

The human brain is the gold standard of adaptive learning. It not only can learn and benefit from experience, but also can adapt to new situations. In contrast, deep neural networks only learn one sophisticated but fixed mapping from inputs to outputs. This limits their applicability to more dynamic situations, where input to output mapping may change with different contexts. A salient example is continual learning - learning new independent tasks sequentially without forgetting previous tasks. Continual learning of multiple tasks in artificial neural networks using gradient descent leads to catastrophic forgetting, whereby a previously learned mapping of an old task is erased when learning new mappings for new tasks. Here, we propose a new biologically plausible type of deep neural network with extra, out-of-network, task-dependent biasing units to accommodate these dynamic situations. This allows, for the first time, a single network to learn potentially unlimited parallel input to output mappings, and to switch on the fly between them at runtime. Biasing units are programmed by leveraging beneficial perturbations (opposite to well-known adversarial perturbations) for each task. Beneficial perturbations for a given task bias the network toward that task, essentially switching the network into a different mode to process that task. This largely eliminates catastrophic interference between tasks. Our approach is memory-efficient and parameter-efficient, can accommodate many tasks, and achieves state-of-the-art performance across different tasks and domains.