Not enough data to create a plot.
Try a different view from the menu above.
Hatt, Mathieu
MedShapeNet -- A Large-Scale Dataset of 3D Medical Shapes for Computer Vision
Li, Jianning, Zhou, Zongwei, Yang, Jiancheng, Pepe, Antonio, Gsaxner, Christina, Luijten, Gijs, Qu, Chongyu, Zhang, Tiezheng, Chen, Xiaoxi, Li, Wenxuan, Wodzinski, Marek, Friedrich, Paul, Xie, Kangxian, Jin, Yuan, Ambigapathy, Narmada, Nasca, Enrico, Solak, Naida, Melito, Gian Marco, Vu, Viet Duc, Memon, Afaque R., Schlachta, Christopher, De Ribaupierre, Sandrine, Patel, Rajnikant, Eagleson, Roy, Chen, Xiaojun, Mächler, Heinrich, Kirschke, Jan Stefan, de la Rosa, Ezequiel, Christ, Patrick Ferdinand, Li, Hongwei Bran, Ellis, David G., Aizenberg, Michele R., Gatidis, Sergios, Küstner, Thomas, Shusharina, Nadya, Heller, Nicholas, Andrearczyk, Vincent, Depeursinge, Adrien, Hatt, Mathieu, Sekuboyina, Anjany, Löffler, Maximilian, Liebl, Hans, Dorent, Reuben, Vercauteren, Tom, Shapey, Jonathan, Kujawa, Aaron, Cornelissen, Stefan, Langenhuizen, Patrick, Ben-Hamadou, Achraf, Rekik, Ahmed, Pujades, Sergi, Boyer, Edmond, Bolelli, Federico, Grana, Costantino, Lumetti, Luca, Salehi, Hamidreza, Ma, Jun, Zhang, Yao, Gharleghi, Ramtin, Beier, Susann, Sowmya, Arcot, Garza-Villarreal, Eduardo A., Balducci, Thania, Angeles-Valdez, Diego, Souza, Roberto, Rittner, Leticia, Frayne, Richard, Ji, Yuanfeng, Ferrari, Vincenzo, Chatterjee, Soumick, Dubost, Florian, Schreiber, Stefanie, Mattern, Hendrik, Speck, Oliver, Haehn, Daniel, John, Christoph, Nürnberger, Andreas, Pedrosa, João, Ferreira, Carlos, Aresta, Guilherme, Cunha, António, Campilho, Aurélio, Suter, Yannick, Garcia, Jose, Lalande, Alain, Vandenbossche, Vicky, Van Oevelen, Aline, Duquesne, Kate, Mekhzoum, Hamza, Vandemeulebroucke, Jef, Audenaert, Emmanuel, Krebs, Claudia, van Leeuwen, Timo, Vereecke, Evie, Heidemeyer, Hauke, Röhrig, Rainer, Hölzle, Frank, Badeli, Vahid, Krieger, Kathrin, Gunzer, Matthias, Chen, Jianxu, van Meegdenburg, Timo, Dada, Amin, Balzer, Miriam, Fragemann, Jana, Jonske, Frederic, Rempe, Moritz, Malorodov, Stanislav, Bahnsen, Fin H., Seibold, Constantin, Jaus, Alexander, Marinov, Zdravko, Jaeger, Paul F., Stiefelhagen, Rainer, Santos, Ana Sofia, Lindo, Mariana, Ferreira, André, Alves, Victor, Kamp, Michael, Abourayya, Amr, Nensa, Felix, Hörst, Fabian, Brehmer, Alexander, Heine, Lukas, Hanusrichter, Yannik, Weßling, Martin, Dudda, Marcel, Podleska, Lars E., Fink, Matthias A., Keyl, Julius, Tserpes, Konstantinos, Kim, Moon-Sung, Elhabian, Shireen, Lamecker, Hans, Zukić, Dženan, Paniagua, Beatriz, Wachinger, Christian, Urschler, Martin, Duong, Luc, Wasserthal, Jakob, Hoyer, Peter F., Basu, Oliver, Maal, Thomas, Witjes, Max J. H., Schiele, Gregor, Chang, Ti-chiun, Ahmadi, Seyed-Ahmad, Luo, Ping, Menze, Bjoern, Reyes, Mauricio, Deserno, Thomas M., Davatzikos, Christos, Puladi, Behrus, Fua, Pascal, Yuille, Alan L., Kleesiek, Jens, Egger, Jan
Prior to the deep learning era, shape was commonly used to describe the objects. Nowadays, state-of-the-art (SOTA) algorithms in medical imaging are predominantly diverging from computer vision, where voxel grids, meshes, point clouds, and implicit surface models are used. This is seen from numerous shape-related publications in premier vision conferences as well as the growing popularity of ShapeNet (about 51,300 models) and Princeton ModelNet (127,915 models). For the medical domain, we present a large collection of anatomical shapes (e.g., bones, organs, vessels) and 3D models of surgical instrument, called MedShapeNet, created to facilitate the translation of data-driven vision algorithms to medical applications and to adapt SOTA vision algorithms to medical problems. As a unique feature, we directly model the majority of shapes on the imaging data of real patients. As of today, MedShapeNet includes 23 dataset with more than 100,000 shapes that are paired with annotations (ground truth). Our data is freely accessible via a web interface and a Python application programming interface (API) and can be used for discriminative, reconstructive, and variational benchmarks as well as various applications in virtual, augmented, or mixed reality, and 3D printing. Exemplary, we present use cases in the fields of classification of brain tumors, facial and skull reconstructions, multi-class anatomy completion, education, and 3D printing. In future, we will extend the data and improve the interfaces. The project pages are: https://medshapenet.ikim.nrw/ and https://github.com/Jianningli/medshapenet-feedback
Joint nnU-Net and Radiomics Approaches for Segmentation and Prognosis of Head and Neck Cancers with PET/CT images
Xu, Hui, Li, Yihao, Zhao, Wei, Quellec, Gwenolé, Lu, Lijun, Hatt, Mathieu
Automatic segmentation of head and neck cancer (HNC) tumors and lymph nodes plays a crucial role in the optimization treatment strategy and prognosis analysis. This study aims to employ nnU-Net for automatic segmentation and radiomics for recurrence-free survival (RFS) prediction using pretreatment PET/CT images in multi-center HNC cohort. A multi-center HNC dataset with 883 patients (524 patients for training, 359 for testing) was provided in HECKTOR 2022. A bounding box of the extended oropharyngeal region was retrieved for each patient with fixed size of 224 x 224 x 224 $mm^{3}$. Then 3D nnU-Net architecture was adopted to automatic segmentation of primary tumor and lymph nodes synchronously.Based on predicted segmentation, ten conventional features and 346 standardized radiomics features were extracted for each patient. Three prognostic models were constructed containing conventional and radiomics features alone, and their combinations by multivariate CoxPH modelling. The statistical harmonization method, ComBat, was explored towards reducing multicenter variations. Dice score and C-index were used as evaluation metrics for segmentation and prognosis task, respectively. For segmentation task, we achieved mean dice score around 0.701 for primary tumor and lymph nodes by 3D nnU-Net. For prognostic task, conventional and radiomics models obtained the C-index of 0.658 and 0.645 in the test set, respectively, while the combined model did not improve the prognostic performance with the C-index of 0.648.