Well File:
- Well Planning ( results)
- Shallow Hazard Analysis ( results)
- Well Plat ( results)
- Wellbore Schematic ( results)
- Directional Survey ( results)
- Fluid Sample ( results)
- Log ( results)
- Density ( results)
- Gamma Ray ( results)
- Mud ( results)
- Resistivity ( results)
- Report ( results)
- Daily Report ( results)
- End of Well Report ( results)
- Well Completion Report ( results)
- Rock Sample ( results)
Eugene Ndiaye
Computing Full Conformal Prediction Set with Approximate Homotopy
Eugene Ndiaye, Ichiro Takeuchi
If you are predicting the label y of a new object with ŷ, how confident are you that y = ŷ? Conformal prediction methods provide an elegant framework for answering such question by building a 100(1 α)% confidence region without assumptions on the distribution of the data. It is based on a refitting procedure that parses all the possibilities for y to select the most likely ones. Although providing strong coverage guarantees, conformal set is impractical to compute exactly for many regression problems. We propose efficient algorithms to compute conformal prediction set using approximated solution of (convex) regularized empirical risk minimization. Our approaches rely on a new homotopy continuation technique for tracking the solution path with respect to sequential changes of the observations. We also provide a detailed analysis quantifying its complexity.
GAP Safe Screening Rules for Sparse-Group Lasso
Eugene Ndiaye, Olivier Fercoq, Alexandre Gramfort, Joseph Salmon
For statistical learning in high dimension, sparse regularizations have proven useful to boost both computational and statistical efficiency. In some contexts, it is natural to handle more refined structures than pure sparsity, such as for instance group sparsity. Sparse-Group Lasso has recently been introduced in the context of linear regression to enforce sparsity both at the feature and at the group level. We propose the first (provably) safe screening rules for Sparse-Group Lasso, i.e., rules that allow to discard early in the solver features/groups that are inactive at optimal solution. Thanks to efficient dual gap computations relying on the geometric properties of ɛ-norm, safe screening rules for Sparse-Group Lasso lead to significant gains in term of computing time for our coordinate descent implementation.