Benchmarks are important tools for tracking the rapid advancements in large language model (LLM) capabilities. However, benchmarks are not keeping pace in difficulty: LLMs now achieve over 90\% accuracy on popular benchmarks like MMLU, limiting informed measurement of state-of-the-art LLM capabilities. In response, we introduce Humanity's Last Exam (HLE), a multi-modal benchmark at the frontier of human knowledge, designed to be the final closed-ended academic benchmark of its kind with broad subject coverage. HLE consists of 3,000 questions across dozens of subjects, including mathematics, humanities, and the natural sciences. HLE is developed globally by subject-matter experts and consists of multiple-choice and short-answer questions suitable for automated grading. Each question has a known solution that is unambiguous and easily verifiable, but cannot be quickly answered via internet retrieval. State-of-the-art LLMs demonstrate low accuracy and calibration on HLE, highlighting a significant gap between current LLM capabilities and the expert human frontier on closed-ended academic questions. To inform research and policymaking upon a clear understanding of model capabilities, we publicly release HLE at https://lastexam.ai.

Solving these equations analytically is often challenging or even impossible, necessitating the utilization of other methods to obtain approximate solutions. One way to find approximate solutions to partial differential equations is through classical numerical methods. These methods have been studied for years and already have strong theoretical foundations when it comes to error estimation [1]. However, in recent years, with the rise of machine learning as a whole, there has also been an increased interest in applying machine learning methods to the problem of finding approximate solutions to PDEs. As universal function approximators [2], deep neural networks provide a promising avenue for a multitude of approaches to the approximation of solutions to partial differential equations. Among these methods are neural operators, methods based on the Feynman-Kac formula, and methods for parametric PDEs [3] [4] [5]. This paper focuses on physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), which were conceived as feed-forward neural networks that incorporate the dynamics of the PDE into their loss function [6].

In the Fourth Industrial Revolution, wherein artificial intelligence and the automation of machines occupy a central role, the deployment of robots is indispensable. However, the manufacturing process using robots, especially in collaboration with humans, is highly intricate. In particular, modeling the friction torque in robotic joints is a longstanding problem due to the lack of a good mathematical description. This motivates the usage of data-driven methods in recent works. However, model-based and data-driven models often exhibit limitations in their ability to generalize beyond the specific dynamics they were trained on, as we demonstrate in this paper. To address this challenge, we introduce a novel approach based on residual learning, which aims to adapt an existing friction model to new dynamics using as little data as possible. We validate our approach by training a base neural network on a symmetric friction data set to learn an accurate relation between the velocity and the friction torque. Subsequently, to adapt to more complex asymmetric settings, we train a second network on a small dataset, focusing on predicting the residual of the initial network's output. By combining the output of both networks in a suitable manner, our proposed estimator outperforms the conventional model-based approach and the base neural network significantly. Furthermore, we evaluate our method on trajectories involving external loads and still observe a substantial improvement, approximately 60-70\%, over the conventional approach. Our method does not rely on data with external load during training, eliminating the need for external torque sensors. This demonstrates the generalization capability of our approach, even with a small amount of data-only 43 seconds of a robot movement-enabling adaptation to diverse scenarios based on prior knowledge about friction in different settings.

In this survey, we aim to explore the fundamental question of whether the next generation of artificial intelligence requires quantum computing. Artificial intelligence is increasingly playing a crucial role in many aspects of our daily lives and is central to the fourth industrial revolution. It is therefore imperative that artificial intelligence is reliable and trustworthy. However, there are still many issues with reliability of artificial intelligence, such as privacy, responsibility, safety, and security, in areas such as autonomous driving, healthcare, robotics, and others. These problems can have various causes, including insufficient data, biases, and robustness problems, as well as fundamental issues such as computability problems on digital hardware. The cause of these computability problems is rooted in the fact that digital hardware is based on the computing model of the Turing machine, which is inherently discrete. Notably, our findings demonstrate that digital hardware is inherently constrained in solving problems about optimization, deep learning, or differential equations. Therefore, these limitations carry substantial implications for the field of artificial intelligence, in particular for machine learning. Furthermore, although it is well known that the quantum computer shows a quantum advantage for certain classes of problems, our findings establish that some of these limitations persist when employing quantum computing models based on the quantum circuit or the quantum Turing machine paradigm. In contrast, analog computing models, such as the Blum-Shub-Smale machine, exhibit the potential to surmount these limitations.

Physical law learning is the ambiguous attempt at automating the derivation of governing equations with the use of machine learning techniques. The current literature focuses however solely on the development of methods to achieve this goal, and a theoretical foundation is at present missing. This paper shall thus serve as a first step to build a comprehensive theoretical framework for learning physical laws, aiming to provide reliability to according algorithms. One key problem consists in the fact that the governing equations might not be uniquely determined by the given data. We will study this problem in the common situation that a physical law is described by an ordinary or partial differential equation. For various different classes of differential equations, we provide both necessary and sufficient conditions for a function to uniquely determine the differential equation which is governing the phenomenon. We then use our results to devise numerical algorithms to determine whether a function solves a differential equation uniquely. Finally, we provide extensive numerical experiments showing that our algorithms in combination with common approaches for learning physical laws indeed allow to guarantee that a unique governing differential equation is learnt, without assuming any knowledge about the function, thereby ensuring reliability.