Data Science Has Been Using Rebel Statistics for a Long Time

Many of those who call themselves statisticians just won't admit that data science heavily relies on and uses (heretical, rule-breaking) statistical science, or they don't recognize the true statistical nature of these data science techniques (some are 15-year old), or are opposed to the modernization of their statistical arsenal. They already missed the train when machine learning became a popular discipline (also heavily based on statistics) more than 15 years ago. Now machine learning professionals, who are statistical practitioners working on problems such as clustering, far outnumber statisticians. Many times, I have interacted with statisticians who think that anyone not calling himself statistician, knows nothing or little about statistics; see my recent bio published here, or visit the LinkedIn profiles of many data scientists, to debunk this myth. Any statistical technique that is not in their old books are considered heretical at best, or non-statistic at worst, or most of the time, not understood.