Is Hans Zimmer secretly a Super Data Scientist?

Hans Zimmer asks the question: "What if I could define a character in one note?" He spends his days running "experiments" and processing "Big Data" (the imaginary world painted in the film's script, his cultural and artistic background, etc.) using the distributed neuronal network architecture of his innate biological computer and extracts "models" comprised of emotionally-stirring themes full of rich patterns, context, and meaning "visualized" through the auditory medium (the Score) that either makes or breaks the ability of a producer/director to tell a story. Now, in order for his patterns to be effective in communicating the thematic message, they must strike a fundamentally common cultural chord within the audience that responds to the thematic information being conveyed, perhaps through some kind of shared library of archetypal cultural-emotional reference points (a shared prior), that facilitates some kind of visceral mutual appreciation. One might think of the universe of all possible scores for a film being embedded into some kind of high dimensional space that also contains the score of interest (like the sculpture already present in the marble), and Hans essentially exploring this musical space through'experiments' to find that subspace of specific themes that have a high degree of correlation with the various elements of the film. In a sense, he uses both a bayesian approach relying on his vast prior knowledge of themes, motifs, etc., a dimension-reduction approach by whittling away inessential elements, and adding raw innovations to identify those particular threads that have the best correspondence to the action in a particular scene.