Review for NeurIPS paper: End-to-End Learning and Intervention in Games

Correctness: I don't see any problems with the empirical methodology. There are a few claims that seem somewhat misleading, possibly due to lack of clarity in writing. For example, in subsection 3.2.1, after discussing requirements for the convergence of the projection method, the authors state "Therefore, a sufficiently small r can guarantee convergence for projection methods in general". It's unclear what context this should be read in, but this contradicts the monotone setting mentioned earlier. However, the former may not generate a solution to the VI whereas the latter obviously does so the claim is at least misleading.