Review for NeurIPS paper: SCOP: Scientific Control for Reliable Neural Network Pruning

Summary and Contributions: Post Rebuttal I have read the reviews of the fellow reviewers and the response of the authors. They have addressed the 2/3 of my points. Methodology and communication is somewhat lacking, and prevents a thorough understanding of the approach and implementation (acknowledged by R4 as well). The authors have agreed to work on this, although it is not sure how they plan to go about it. The results for the methods compared were changing between tables, and it was suggested to present mean and std.