Export Reviews, Discussions, Author Feedback and Meta-Reviews

The paper was fairly clear overall. As stated above, my main concern is that the VTT evaluation might produce very different results from one set of evaluators to another, as is a danger for any such manual evaluation. The scale of resources needed to reproduce it makes it somewhat inaccessible to academic groups. A more detailed experimental protocol, including instructions given to examiners, should be provided. Aside from that, there are a few few questions/comments for the authors to consider: * The first part of the title is a little weird.