Review for NeurIPS paper: RATT: Recurrent Attention to Transient Tasks for Continual Image Captioning

The paper received two accept reviews and one borderline reject [R1]. The main concern of R1 is the paper relies on simple/not the most recent approaches for both captioning and continual learning. The other reviewers and I agree to that but believe that for one of the first papers in continual learning for captioning that this is reasonable, even if it is not optimal. R1 did not respond after the rebuttal. The reviewers appreciate the the paper's contributions, including 1) First paper in continual learning in image captioning.