Probabilistic time series forecasting, essential in domains like healthcare and neuroscience, requires models capable of capturing uncertainty and intricate temporal dependencies. While deep learning has advanced forecasting, generating calibrated probability distributions over continuous future values remains challenging. We introduce Temporal Generative Flow Networks (Temporal GFNs), adapting Generative Flow Networks (GFNs) - a powerful framework for generating compositional objects - to this sequential prediction task. GFNs learn policies to construct objects (eg.

We introduce copresheaf topological neural networks (CTNNs), a powerful unifying framework that encapsulates a wide spectrum of deep learning architectures, designed to operate on structured data, including images, point clouds, graphs, meshes, and topological manifolds. While deep learning has profoundly impacted domains ranging from digital assistants to autonomous systems, the principled design of neural architectures tailored to specific tasks and data types remains one of the field's most persistent open challenges. CTNNs address this gap by formulating model design in the language of copresheaves, a concept from algebraic topology that generalizes most practical deep learning models in use today. This abstract yet constructive formulation yields a rich design space from which theoretically sound and practically effective solutions can be derived to tackle core challenges in representation learning, such as long-range dependencies, oversmoothing, heterophily, and non-Euclidean domains. Our empirical results on structured data benchmarks demonstrate that CTNNs consistently outperform conventional baselines, particularly in tasks requiring hierarchical or localized sensitivity. These results establish CTNNs as a principled multi-scale foundation for the next generation of deep learning architectures.

Previous studies have compared neural activities in the visual cortex to representations in deep neural networks trained on image classification. Interestingly, while some suggest that their representations are highly similar, others argued the opposite. Here, we propose a new approach to characterize the similarity of the decision strategies of two observers (models or brains) using decision variable correlation (DVC). DVC quantifies the image-by-image correlation between the decoded decisions based on the internal neural representations in a classification task. Thus, it can capture task-relevant information rather than general representational alignment. We evaluate DVC using monkey V4/IT recordings and network models trained on image classification tasks. We find that model-model similarity is comparable to monkey-monkey similarity, whereas model-monkey similarity is consistently lower.

In contrast, most visual representation learning systems assign fixed-length representations to all inputs, ignoring variations in complexity or familiarity. Recent adaptive tokenization methods address this by allocating variable-length representations but typically require test-time search over multiple hypotheses to identify the most predictive one. Inspired by KC principles, we propose a one-shot adaptive tokenizer, KARL, that predicts the appropriate number of tokens for an image in a single forward pass, halting once its approximate KC is reached. The token count serves as a proxy for the minimum description length. KARL performs comparably to recent adaptive tokenizers while operating in a one-pass manner. Additionally, we present a conceptual study showing a correlation between adaptive tokenization and core ideas from AIT. We demonstrate that adaptive tokenization not only aligns with KC but also reveals empirical signals approximating AIT concepts such as sophistication and logical depth. Finally, we analyze predicted image complexity and interestingness across axes such as structure vs. noise and in-distribution vs. out-of-distribution familiarity, highlighting alignment with human annotations.

We study a sequential decision-making problem on a $n$-node graph $\mathcal{G}$ where each node has an unknown label from a finite set $\mathbf{\Omega}$, drawn from a joint distribution $\mathcal{P}$ that is Markov with respect to $\mathcal{G}$. At each step, selecting a node reveals its label and yields a label-dependent reward. The goal is to adaptively choose nodes to maximize expected accumulated discounted rewards. We impose a frontier exploration constraint, where actions are limited to neighbors of previously selected nodes, reflecting practical constraints in settings such as contact tracing and robotic exploration. We design a Gittins index-based policy that applies to general graphs and is provably optimal when $\mathcal{G}$ is a forest.

Neural Radiance Fields (NeRFs) are neural networks -- typically multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) -- that represent the geometry and appearance of objects, with applications in vision, graphics, and robotics. Recent works propose understanding NeRFs with natural language using Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) that directly process the weights of a NeRF's MLP. However, these approaches rely on a global representation of the input object, making them unsuitable for spatial reasoning and fine-grained understanding. In contrast, we propose **weights2space**, a self-supervised framework featuring a novel meta-encoder that can compute a sequence of spatial tokens directly from the weights of a NeRF. Leveraging this representation, we build **Spatial LLaNA**, a novel MLLM for NeRFs, capable of understanding details and spatial relationships in objects represented as NeRFs. We evaluate Spatial LLaNA on NeRF captioning and NeRF Q&A tasks, using both existing benchmarks and our novel **Spatial ObjaNeRF** dataset consisting of $100$ manually-curated language annotations for NeRFs. This dataset features 3D models and descriptions that challenge the spatial reasoning capability of MLLMs. Spatial LLaNA outperforms existing approaches across all tasks.

Scaffolding Large Language Models (LLMs) into multi-agent systems often improves performance on complex tasks, but the safety impact of such scaffolds has not been thoroughly explored. We introduce AgentBreeder, a framework for multi-objective self-improving evolutionary search over scaffolds. We evaluate discovered scaffolds on widely recognized reasoning, mathematics, and safety benchmarks and compare them with popular baselines. In blue mode, we see a 79.4% average uplift in safety benchmark performance while maintaining or improving capability scores. In red mode, we find adversarially weak scaffolds emerging concurrently with capability optimization. Our work demonstrates the risks of multi-agent scaffolding and provides a framework for mitigating them.

In recent years, many studies proposed to generate solutions for Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) scheduling problem in one shot by combining reinforcement learning and list scheduling heuristic. However, these existing methods suffer from biased estimation of sampling probabilities and inefficient guidance in training, due to redundant comparisons among node priorities and the sparse reward challenge. To address these issues, we analyze of the limitations of these existing methods, and propose a novel one-shot DAG scheduling method with comparability identification and dense reward signal, based on the policy gradient framework. In our method, a comparable antichain identification mechanism is proposed to eliminate the problem of redundant nodewise priority comparison. We also propose a dense reward signal for node level decision-making optimization in training, effectively addressing the sparse reward challenge. The experimental results show that the proposed method can yield superior results of scheduling objectives compared to other learning-based DAG scheduling methods.

We present Neural Attention Search (NAtS), an end-to-end learnable sparse transformer that automatically evaluates the importance of each token within a sequence and determines if the corresponding token can be dropped after several steps. To this end, we design a search space that contains three token types: (i) Global Tokens will be preserved and queried by all the following tokens.

The concept of causal abstraction got recently popularised to demystify the opaque decision-making processes of machine learning models; in short, a neural network can be abstracted as a higher-level algorithm if there exists a function which allows us to map between them. Notably, most interpretability papers implement these maps as linear functions, motivated by the linear representation hypothesis: the idea that features are encoded linearly in a model's representations. However, this linearity constraint is not required by the definition of causal abstraction. In this work, we critically examine the concept of causal abstraction by considering arbitrarily powerful alignment maps. In particular, we prove that under reasonable assumptions, any neural network can be mapped to any algorithm, rendering this unrestricted notion of causal abstraction trivial and uninformative. We complement these theoretical findings with empirical evidence, demonstrating that it is possible to perfectly map models to algorithms even when these models are incapable of solving the actual task; e.g., on an experiment using randomly initialised language models, our alignment maps reach 100\% interchange-intervention accuracy on the indirect object identification task. This raises the non-linear representation dilemma: if we lift the linearity constraint imposed to alignment maps in causal abstraction analyses, we are left with no principled way to balance the inherent trade-off between these maps' complexity and accuracy. Together, these results suggest an answer to our title's question: causal abstraction is not enough for mechanistic interpretability, as it becomes vacuous without assumptions about how models encode information. Studying the connection between this information-encoding assumption and causal abstraction should lead to exciting future work.