Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), as an effective alternative medicine, has been receiving increasing attention. In recent years, the rapid development of large language models (LLMs) tailored for TCM has highlighted the urgent need for an objective and comprehensive evaluation framework to assess their performance on real-world tasks. However, existing evaluation datasets are limited in scope and primarily text-based, lacking a unified and standardized multimodal question-answering (QA) benchmark. To address this issue, we introduce TCM-Ladder, the first comprehensive multimodal QA dataset specifically designed for evaluating large TCM language models. The dataset covers multiple core disciplines of TCM, including fundamental theory, diagnostics, herbal formulas, internal medicine, surgery, pharmacognosy, and pediatrics.

Large Language Models have demonstrated impressive fluency across diverse tasks, yet their tendency to produce toxic content remains a critical challenge for AI safety and public trust. Existing toxicity mitigation approaches primarily manipulate individual neuron activations, but these methods suffer from instability, context dependence, and often compromise the model's core language abilities. To address these shortcomings, we investigate three key questions: the stability of neuron-level toxicity indicators, the advantages of structural (layer-wise) representations, and the interpretability of mechanisms driving toxic generation. Through extensive experiments on Jigsaw and ToxiCN datasets, we show that aggregated layer-wise features provide more robust signals than single neurons. Moreover, we observe conceptual limitations in prior works that conflate toxicity detection experts and generation experts within neuron-based interventions. To mitigate this, we propose a novel principled intervention technique, EigenShift, based on eigen-decomposition of the language model's final output layer. This method selectively targets generation-aligned components, enabling precise toxicity suppression without impairing linguistic competence. Our method requires no additional training or fine-tuning, incurs minimal computational cost, and is grounded in rigorous theoretical analysis.

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have significantly enhanced their capabilities in complex problem-solving by introducing a thinking draft that enables multi-path Chain-of-Thought explorations before producing final answers. Ensuring the faithfulness of these intermediate reasoning processes is crucial for reliable monitoring, interpretation, and effective control. In this paper, we propose a systematic counterfactual intervention framework to rigorously evaluate .

Quantifying differences between probability distributions is fundamental to statistics and machine learning, primarily for comparing statistical uncertainty. In contrast, epistemic uncertainty---due to incomplete knowledge---requires richer representations than those offered by classical probability. Imprecise probability (IP) theory offers such models, capturing ambiguity and partial belief. This has driven growing interest in imprecise probabilistic machine learning (IPML), where inference and decision-making rely on broader uncertainty models---highlighting the need for metrics beyond classical probability. This work introduces the Integral Imprecise Probability Metric (IIPM) framework, a Choquet integral-based generalisation of classical Integral Probability Metric to the setting of capacities---a broad class of IP models encompassing many existing ones, including lower probabilities, probability intervals, belief functions, and more. Theoretically, we establish conditions under which IIPM serves as a valid metric and metrises a form of weak convergence of capacities. Practically, IIPM not only enables comparison across different IP models but also supports the quantification of epistemic uncertainty~(EU) within a single IP model. In particular, by comparing an IP model with its conjugate, IIPM gives rise to a new class of epistemic uncertainty measures---Maximum Mean Imprecision (MMI) ---which satisfy key axiomatic properties proposed in the Uncertainty Quantification literature. We validate MMI through selective classification experiments, demonstrating strong empirical performance against established EU measures, and outperforming them when classical methods struggle to scale to a large number of classes.

Recent advances in sign language research have benefited from CNN-based backbones, which are primarily transferred from traditional computer vision tasks (\eg object detection, image recognition). However, these CNN-based backbones usually excel at extracting features like contours and texture, but may struggle with capturing sign-related features. To capture such sign-related features, SignGraph model extracts the cross-region sign features by building the Local Sign Graph (LSG) module and the Temporal Sign Graph (TSG) module. However, we emphasize that although capturing cross-region dependencies can improve sign language performance, it may degrade the representation quality of local regions. To mitigate this, we introduce MixSignGraph, which represents sign sequences as a group of mixed graphs for feature extraction. Specifically, besides the LSG module and TSG module that model the intra-frame and inter-frame cross-regions features, we design a simple yet effective Hierarchical Sign Graph (HSG) module, which enhances local region representations following the extraction of cross-region features, by aggregating the same-region features from different-granularity feature maps of a frame, \ie to boost discriminative local features. In addition, to further improve the performance of gloss-free sign language task, we propose a simple yet counter-intuitive Text-based CTC Pre-training (TCTC) method, which generates pseudo gloss labels from text sequences for model pre-training. Extensive experiments conducted on the current five sign language datasets demonstrate that MixSignGraph surpasses the most current models on multiple sign language tasks across several datasets, without relying on any additional cues.

When applicants get rejected by a high-stakes algorithmic decision system, recourse explanations provide actionable suggestions for applicants on how to change their input features to get a positive evaluation. A crucial yet overlooked phenomenon is that recourse explanations are: When many applicants act according to their recommendations, their collective behavior may shift the data distribution and, once the model is refitted, also the decision boundary. Consequently, the recourse algorithm may render its own recommendations, such that applicants who make the effort of implementing their recommendations may be rejected again when they reapply. In this work, we formally characterize the conditions under which recourse explanations remain valid under their own performative effects. In particular, we prove that recourse actions may become invalid if they are influenced by or if they intervene on non-causal variables. Based on this analysis, we caution against the use of standard counterfactual explanations and causal recourse methods, and instead advocate for recourse methods that recommend actions exclusively on causal variables.

Active learning (AL) reduces annotation costs by selecting the most informative samples based on both model sensitivity and predictive uncertainty. While sensitivity can be measured through parameter gradients in an unsupervised manner, predictive uncertainty can hardly be estimated without true labels especially for regression tasks, reducing the informativeness of actively selected samples. This paper proposes the concept of \textit{auxiliary data} to aid the uncertainty estimation for regression tasks. With detailed theoretical analysis, we reveal that auxiliary data, despite potential distribution shifts, can provide a promising uncertainty surrogate when properly weighted. Such finding inspires our design of AGBAL, a novel AL framework that recalibrates auxiliary data losses through density ratio weighting to obtain reliable uncertainty estimates for sample selection. Extensive experiments show that AGBAL consistently outperforms existing approaches without auxiliary data across diverse synthetic and real-world datasets.

Modern multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can reason over hour-long video, yet their key-value (KV) cache grows linearly with time--quickly exceeding the fixed memory of phones, AR glasses, and edge robots. Prior compression schemes either assume the whole video and user query are available offline or must first build the full cache, so memory still scales with stream length. InfiniPot-V is the first training-free, query-agnostic framework that enforces a hard, length-independent memory cap for \textit{streaming} video understanding. During video encoding it monitors the cache and, once a user-set threshold is reached, runs a lightweight compression pass that (i) removes temporally redundant tokens via Temporal-axis Redundancy (TaR) metric and (ii) keeps semantically significant tokens via Value-Norm (VaN) ranking. Across four open-source MLLMs and four long-video and streaming-video benchmarks, InfiniPot-V cuts peak GPU memory by up to 94\%, sustains real-time generation, and matches or surpasses full-cache accuracy--even in multi-turn dialogues. By dissolving the KV cache bottleneck without retraining or query knowledge, InfiniPot-V closes the gap for on-device streaming video assistants.

Despite their many successes, transformer-based large language models (LLMs) continue to struggle with tasks that require complex reasoning over large parts of their input. We argue that these failures arise due to capacity limits on the accurate flow of information within LLMs. To formalize this issue, we introduce the bounded attention prefix oracle (BAPO) model, a new computational framework that models bandwidth constraints on attention heads, the mechanism for internal communication in LLMs. We show that several important reasoning problems like graph reachability require high communication bandwidth for BAPOs to solve; we call these problems BAPO-hard. Our experiments corroborate our theoretical predictions: GPT-4o, Claude, and Gemini succeed on BAPO-easy tasks and fail even on relatively small BAPO-hard tasks. BAPOs also reveal another benefit of chain of thought (CoT): we prove that breaking down a task using CoT can turn any BAPO-hard problem into a BAPO-easy one. Our results offer principled explanations for key LLM failures and suggest directions for architectures and inference methods that mitigate bandwidth limits.

Diffusion models operating in discrete state spaces have emerged as powerful approaches, demonstrating remarkable efficacy across diverse domains, including reasoning tasks and molecular design. Despite their promising applications, the theoretical foundations of these models remain substantially underdeveloped, with the existing literature predominantly focusing on continuous-state diffusion models. A critical gap persists in the theoretical understanding of discrete diffusion modeling: the absence of a rigorous framework for quantifying estimation error with finite data. Consequently, the fundamental question of how precisely one can reconstruct the true underlying distribution from a limited training set remains unresolved. In this work, we analyze the estimation error induced by a score estimation of the discrete diffusion models. One of the main difficulties in the analysis stems from the fact that the cardinality of the state space can be exponentially large with respect to its dimension, which results in an intractable error bound by a naive approach. To overcome this difficulty, we make use of a property that the state space can be smoothly embedded in a continuous Euclidean space that enables us to derive a cardinality independent bound, which is more practical in real applications. In particular, we consider a setting where the state space is structured as a hypercube graph, and another where the induced graph Laplacian can be asymptotically well approximated by the ordinary Laplacian defined on the continuous space, and then derive state space size independent bounds.