Technology
L2T-DLN: Learning to Teach with Dynamic Loss Network
With the concept of teaching being introduced to the machine learning community, a teacher model start using dynamic loss functions to teach the training of a student model. The dynamic intends to set adaptive loss functions to different phases of student model learning. In existing works, the teacher model 1) merely determines the loss function based on the present states of the student model, i.e., disregards the experience of the teacher; 2) only utilizes the states of the student model, e.g., training iteration number and loss/accuracy from training/validation sets, while ignoring the states of the loss function. In this paper, we first formulate the loss adjustment as a temporal task by designing a teacher model with memory units, and, therefore, enables the student learning to be guided by the experience of the teacher model. Then, with a dynamic loss network, we can additionally use the states of the loss to assist the teacher learning in enhancing the interactions between the teacher and the student model. Extensive experiments demonstrate our approach can enhance student learning and improve the performance of various deep models on real-world tasks, including classification, objective detection, and semantic segmentation scenarios.
Understanding Bias in Large-Scale Visual Datasets
A recent study has shown that large-scale visual datasets are very biased: they can be easily classified by modern neural networks. However, the concrete forms of bias among these datasets remain unclear. In this study, we propose a framework to identify the unique visual attributes distinguishing these datasets. Our approach applies various transformations to extract semantic, structural, boundary, color, and frequency information from datasets, and assess how much each type of information reflects their bias. We further decompose their semantic bias with object-level analysis, and leverage natural language methods to generate detailed, open-ended descriptions of each dataset's characteristics. Our work aims to help researchers understand the bias in existing large-scale pre-training datasets, and build more diverse and representative ones in the future.
Elon Musk Testifies That He Started OpenAI to Prevent a 'Terminator Outcome'
Elon Musk Testifies That He Started OpenAI to Prevent a'Terminator Outcome' The judge also warned Musk and Sam Altman to curb their "propensity to use social media to make things worse outside the courtroom" after both sides traded attacks online. Elon Musk and Sam Altman appeared in a federal courtroom together for the first time on Tuesday as they fight over OpenAI's decade-long evolution and what it means for the company's future. The trial in Musk's lawsuit against Altman could result in financial damages and, more significantly, governance changes at OpenAI that may complicate its plans for an initial public offering as soon as this year. As the first witness on the stand, Musk immediately sought to frame his case as more than just about OpenAI. Siding with Altman "will give license to looting every charity in America" and shake the "entire foundation of charitable giving," Musk told a panel of nine jurors advising US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on how to rule.
Slimmed Asymmetrical Contrastive Learning and Cross Distillation for Lightweight Model Training 1 Supplementary Material
In Section 3.2, we proposed the crossdistillation (XD) learning scheme. The distillation objective in Eq (10) is the inner decorrelation minimization between embeddings z and [ z]. In addition to the correlation-based distillation loss, we also investigate the negative logarithm(e.g, To avoid the unbalanced loss magnitude, the distillation loss is introduced as the regularization term controlled by the penalty level γ: L = LSACL(zA,zB)+γLCD (1) LCD = ( [ zA]logzA + [ zB]logzB)/2 (2) We empirically observe that the negative logarithm-based distillation loss failed to outperform the proposed cross-distillation loss LCD with inner-decorrelation minimization. As shown in the ImageNet-100 results below: Method Encoder # of Params (M) Linear Eval Acc.
Are Language Models Actually Useful for Time Series Forecasting?
Large language models (LLMs) are being applied to time series forecasting. But are language models actually useful for time series? In a series of ablation studies on three recent and popular LLM-based time series forecasting methods, we find that removing the LLM component or replacing it with a basic attention layer does not degrade forecasting performance---in most cases, the results even improve! We also find that despite their significant computational cost, pretrained LLMs do no better than models trained from scratch, do not represent the sequential dependencies in time series, and do not assist in few-shot settings. Additionally, we explore time series encoders and find that patching and attention structures perform similarly to LLM-based forecasters.
The Adversarial Consistency of Surrogate Risks for Binary Classification
We study the consistency of surrogate risks for robust binary classification. It is common to learn robust classifiers by adversarial training, which seeks to minimize the expected 0-1 loss when each example can be maliciously corrupted within a small ball. We give a simple and complete characterization of the set of surrogate loss functions that are consistent, i.e., that can replace the 0-1loss without affecting the minimizing sequences of the original adversarial risk, for any data distribution. We also prove a quantitative version of adversarial consistency for the ρ-margin loss. Our results reveal that the class of adversarially consistent surrogates is substantially smaller than in the standard setting, where many common surrogates are known to be consistent.