Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) are leading strategies to reach practical utilities of near-term quantum devices. However, the no-cloning theorem in quantum mechanics precludes standard backpropagation, leading to prohibitive quantum resource costs when applying VQAs to large-scale tasks. To address this challenge, we reformulate the training dynamics of VQAs as a nonlinear partial differential equation and propose a novel protocol that leverages physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to model this dynamical system efficiently. Given a small amount of training trajectory data collected from quantum devices, our protocol predicts the parameter updates of VQAs over multiple iterations on the classical side, dramatically reducing quantum resource costs. Through systematic numerical experiments, we demonstrate that our method achieves up to a 30x speedup compared to conventional methods and reduces quantum resource costs by as much as 90% for tasks involving up to 40 qubits, including ground state preparation of different quantum systems, while maintaining competitive accuracy. Our approach complements existing techniques aimed at improving the efficiency of VQAs and further strengthens their potential for practical applications.

Advancing code reasoning in large language models (LLMs) is fundamentally limited by the scarcity of high-difficulty datasets, especially those with verifiable input-output test cases necessary for rigorous solution validation at scale. We introduce rStar-Coder, which significantly improves LLM code reasoning capabilities by constructing a large-scale, verified dataset of 418K competitionlevel code problems, 580K long-reasoning solutions along with rich test cases of varying difficulty. This is achieved through three core contributions: (1) we curate competitive programming code problems and solutions to synthesize new, solvable problems; (2) we introduce a reliable input-output test case synthesis pipeline that decouples the generation into a three-step input generation method and a mutual verification mechanism for effective output labeling; (3) we augment problems with high-quality, test-case-verified long-reasoning solutions. Extensive experiments on Qwen models (1.5B-14B) across various code reasoning benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of rStar-Coder dataset, achieving leading performance comparable to frontier reasoning LLMs with significantly smaller model sizes.

Pretrained vision-language models such as CLIP achieve strong zero-shot generalization but remain vulnerable to distribution shifts caused by input corruptions. In this work, we investigate how corruptions affect CLIP's image embeddings and uncover a consistent phenomenon we term as embedding variance collapse, where both intra-class and inter-class variances shrink as corruption severity increases. We find that this collapse is closely tied to performance degradation, with inter-class variance strongly correlated with classification accuracy. To explain this phenomenon, we analyze how corruptions alter the structure of the embedding space. Our theoretical results suggest that the visual encoder tends to encode corruption-related signals, which dilute class-discriminative features and compress the representation geometry. We further show that maximizing inter-class variance, even when estimated from pseudo-labels, can provably enhance embedding quality. Based on this insight, we propose Mint, a simple test-time adaptation method that maximizes pseudo-label-based inter-class variance on the fly using cumulative prototypes and gradient estimates. Mintoperates effectively with small batch sizes and consistently improves performance across multiple corruption benchmarks and CLIP architectures. Our code is available at https://github.com/baowenxuan/Mint.

One of the major bottlenecks for deploying popular first-order differentially private (DP) machine learning algorithms (e.g., DP-SGD) lies in their high computation and memory cost, despite the existence of optimized implementations. Zerothorder methods have promise in mitigating the overhead, as they leverage function evaluations to approximate the gradients, hence significantly easier to privatize. While recent works have explored zeroth-order approaches in both private and non-private settings, they still suffer from relatively low utilities compared with DP-SGD, and have only been evaluated in limited application domains. In this work, we propose to leverage public information to guide and improve gradient approximation of private zeroth-order algorithms. We explore a suite of publicdata-assisted zeroth-order optimizers (PAZO) with minimal overhead. We provide theoretical analyses of the PAZO framework under an assumption of the similarity between public and private data. Empirically, we demonstrate that PAZO achieves superior privacy/utility tradeoffs across vision and text tasks in both pre-training and fine-tuning settings, outperforming the best first-order baselines (with public data) especially in highly private regimes, while offering up to 16 runtime speedup.

We study fundamental connections between coalition formation games and clustering, illustrating the cross-disciplinary relevance of these concepts. We focus on graphical hedonic games where agents' preferences are compactly represented by a friendship graph and an enmity graph. In the context of clustering, friendship relations naturally align with data point similarities, whereas enmity corresponds to dissimilarities. We consider two stability notions based on single-agent deviations: local popularity and local stability.

Post-training compression has been a widely employed approach to scale down large language model (LLM) and facilitate efficient inference. In various proposed compression methods, including pruning and quantization, calibration data plays a vital role by informing the weight importance and activation dynamic ranges. However, how calibration data impacts the LLM capability after compression is less explored. Few of the existing works, though recognizing the significance of this study, only investigate the language modeling or commonsense reasoning performance degradation from limited angles, like the data sources or sample amounts. More systematic research is still needed to examine the impacts on different LLM capabilities in terms of compositional properties and domain correspondence of calibration data.

Forecasting real-world time series requires modeling both short-term fluctuations and long-term evolutions, as these signals typically exhibit multiscale temporal structures. A core challenge lies in reconciling such dynamics: high-frequency seasonality demands local precision, while low-frequency trends require global robustness. However, most existing methods adopt a unified loss function across all temporal components, overlooking their structural differences. This misalignment often causes overfitting to seasonal noise or underfitting of long-term trends, leading to suboptimal forecasting performance. To address this issue, we propose a Physics-guided Multiscale Loss Framework (PMLF) that decomposes time series into seasonal and trend components and assigns component-specific objectives grounded in the distinct energy responses of oscillatory and drift dynamics. Specifically, we assign a quadratic loss to seasonal components, reflecting the quadratic potential energy profile of molecular vibration, while a logarithmic loss is used for trend components to capture the sublinear energy profile of molecular drift under sustained external forces. Furthermore, we introduce a softmax-based strategy that adaptively balances the unequal energetic responses of these two physical processes. Experiments on different public benchmarks show that PMLF improves the performance of diverse baselines, demonstrating the effectiveness of physics-guided loss design in modeling structural heterogeneity in time series forecasting.

Local SGD, or Federated Averaging, is one of the most widely used algorithms for distributed optimization. Although it often outperforms alternatives such as mini-batch SGD, existing theory has not fully explained this advantage under realistic assumptions about data heterogeneity. Recent work has suggested that a second-order heterogeneity assumption may suffice to justify the empirical gains of local SGD. We confirm this conjecture by establishing new upper and lower bounds on the convergence of local SGD. These bounds demonstrate how a low secondorder heterogeneity, combined with third-order smoothness, enables local SGD to interpolate between heterogeneous and homogeneous regimes while maintaining communication efficiency. Our main technical contribution is a refined analysis of the consensus error, a central quantity in such results. We validate our theory with experiments on a distributed linear regression task.

While end-to-end adaptive graph learning methods have demonstrated promising results in capturing latent spatiotemporal dependencies, they often suffer from high computational complexity and limited expressive capacity. In this paper, we propose MAGE for efficient spatiotemporal forecasting. We first conduct a theoretical analysis demonstrating that the ReLU activation function employed in existing methods amplifies edgelevel noise during graph topology learning, thereby compromising the fidelity of the learned graph structures. To enhance model expressiveness, we introduce a sparse yet balanced mixture-of-experts strategy, where each expert perceives the unique underlying graph through kernel-based functions and operates with linear complexity relative to the number of nodes. The sparsity mechanism ensures that each node interacts exclusively with compatible experts, while the balancing mechanism promotes uniform activation across all experts, enabling diverse and adaptive graph representations. Furthermore, we theoretically establish that a single graph convolution using the learned graph in MAGE is mathematically equivalent to multiple convolutional steps under conventional graphs. We evaluate MAGE against advanced baselines on multiple real-world spatiotemporal datasets, and MAGE achieves competitive performance while maintaining strong computational efficiency. Our code is available at official repository.

Neural scaling laws are observed in a range of domains, to date with no universal understanding of why they occur. Recent theories suggest that loss power laws arise from Zipf's law, a power law observed in domains like natural language. One theory suggests that language scaling laws emerge when Zipf-distributed task quanta are learned in descending order of frequency. In this paper we examine power-law scaling in AlphaZero, a reinforcement learning algorithm, using a model of language-model scaling. We find that game states in training and inference data scale with Zipf's law, which is known to arise from the tree structure of the environment, and examine the correlation between scaling-law and Zipf'slaw exponents. In agreement with the quanta scaling model, we find that agents optimize state loss in descending order of frequency, even though this order scales inversely with modelling complexity. We also find that inverse scaling, the failure of models to improve with size, is correlated with unusual Zipf curves where end-game states are among the most frequent states. We show evidence that larger models shift their focus to these less-important states, sacrificing their understanding of important early-game states.