Selecting a clustering algorithm and its hyperparameters without labels is a common difficulty in engineering machine learning pipelines that work with unsupervised analysis of sensor, image, or process data. Clustering validation indices (CVIs) provide internal scores for ranking candidate clusterings, but most popular CVIs are built from Euclidean compactness and separation terms and so tend to favour compact, convex partitions. Their performance is known to degrade on non convex, irregular, or variable density data, where kernel transformations or alternative distance measures are typically used at the cost of additional tuning and computation. This paper introduces the Central Description Length (CDL) clustering validation index. CDL uses the observed within cluster compactness, the estimated cluster centers, and the estimated cluster covariances to compute a probabilistic upper bound on the description length associated with the unobservable true cluster centers. The bound condenses intra cluster compactness and centroid displacement into a single computable quantity and is evaluated on the partition produced by any clustering algorithm. The implementation uses only observable quantities (the data, the partition, the estimated centers, and the estimated covariances) and does not use ground truth labels. On synthetic benchmarks with non convex and arbitrary shape clusters, CDL-CVI selected the reference number of clusters more often and reached higher Adjusted Rand Index (ARI) values than the conventional CVIs we tested, without an additional kernel preprocessing stage. On image benchmarks (MNIST, CIFAR-10, STL-10) clustered from frozen unsupervised embeddings, CDL-CVI returned cluster numbers close to the reference class counts across K-means, DBSCAN, and spectral clustering in the reported trials. We also discuss limitations of the approach, in particular its dependence on covariance estimation, the chosen distance metric, and the input representation. 1 Introduction Many engineering machine learning pipelines rely on the clustering of unlabeled measurements: fault diagnosis from vibration and acoustic signals, sensor state discovery in industrial processes, condition monitoring of mechanical and electrical systems, materials characterization, segmentation of images and signals, and exploratory grouping of process variables.

A recurring data mining task in complex networks is to determine how individual nodes contribute to system behavior. Existing approaches rely on either static-graph centralities or control-theoretic quantities such as controllability Gramians, which assume linear, time-invariant dynamics. Estimated systems, however, are typically nonlinear and time-varying. We define "emergent contribution (EC)," a finite-horizon measure of a node's dynamical leverage: the metric-weighted energy of its impulse response accumulated along the system trajectory. Computed from the Jacobians of any differentiable model, EC is estimator-agnostic and reduces exactly to average controllability in the linear, time-invariant limit. Our contribution is a characterization of when the two measures agree and diverge. Using a controlled synthetic family with known ground-truth contribution, we construct a phase diagram spanning nonlinearity, regime structure, persistence, and perturbation amplitude. EC and average controllability agree under static or smoothly drifting dynamics and both track ground truth. Divergence emerges under persistent regime switching, is strongest under persistent sign reversal, and disappears when the sign reversal is removed. At extreme perturbation amplitudes, both measures degrade, identifying the limits of local linearization. We place five estimated real systems from several domains within this phase space. Their placement serves as a diagnostic of when EC provides information beyond static controllability and therefore justifies its additional computational cost. On one panel examined in depth, a twenty-seed retraining ensemble reveals a robust variance--leverage dissociation: nodes whose perturbations propagate widely despite low within-system variance, which is not recovered by static centralities nor variance-based summaries.

Data-driven causal relationship identification is pertinent to advancing understanding of complex systems both within and beyond science. Bayesian networks offer a probabilistic method for modelling generic causal relationships via directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). However, typical techniques for constructing Bayesian networks rely on optimization, which can be ill-suited for learning causal relationships because the underlying data may admit multiple chains of causation. More data-faithful representations of causal relationships would provide frameworks for constructing multiple causal maps that are consistent with the variability that is inherent in underlying data. Here, we show that entropy-based inference generates atlases of plausible causal relationships that are consistent with underlying data. On simulated noisy data of 2- and 20-node linear structural equation models, we sample a maximum-entropy ensemble of graphs that allow us to quantify the inherent structural ambiguity in underlying causal relationships. Our method shows that "optimized" DAGs can contain causal artifacts are not consistent across equivalently accurate topologies.

Physics-Informed Neural Networks inherently suffer from task interference because they rely on a shared parameter space to satisfy both governing differential equations and boundary conditions. We analyze this structural conflict using the Fisher Information Matrix to quantify the effective degrees of freedom ($d_{eff}$) in a physics-constrained model. Unlike the classical $d_{eff}$ which measures how many parameter directions are informed by data against a statistical prior, our $d_{eff}$ measures the dimension of the parameter directions unconstrained by the differential operator. For operators with finite-dimensional kernel, we show that $d_{eff}$ converges to the kernel dimension exactly, independent of network width, depth, or activation function, recasting it from a fit diagnostic into a structural invariant of the underlying continuous operator. For operators with infinite-dimensional kernel, $d_{eff}$ instead measures the network's finite-dimensional representational bandwidth for that kernel rather than recovering an integer invariant. Importantly, $d_{eff}$ also serves as an a priori structural diagnostic. Driving $d_{eff}$ of a well-posed problem to zero certifies that the physics and boundary constraints have absorbed the network's free directions. Building on this characterization, we introduce subspace projection strategies for boundary adaptation. Rather than retraining from scratch, we project parameter updates into the null space of the pre-trained physics operator so that new boundary conditions are satisfied without disturbing the learned physics. Gradient-based fine-tuning can match or exceed this but needs more wall-clock time and tuning, whereas subspace projection delivers near-equivalent quality in seconds to minutes. We validate on linear and nonlinear operators, demonstrating accurate adaptation to initial and boundary shifts and unencountered constraint types.

Sharing the financial impact of rare adverse events across a group can soften extreme individual burdens, but any participant made worse off by the arrangement has reason to leave. A credible mechanism must therefore provide each agent with a trustworthy cap on their future obligation and should be deployed only if the aggregate harm across participants is bounded. We formalise this as the Certified Allocation Problem: from finite data and without distributional assumptions, find a redistribution rule, produce obligation caps for every participant, and verify that no participant is made materially worse off. We propose Conformal Risk Sharing, which solves this problem by pairing an interpretable sharing policy with split conformal calibration. The sharing intensity is tuned on training data, while held-out calibration data produces distribution-free per-agent guarantees (valid under exchangeability). Experiments on synthetic and real-world data, including precipitation and energy-cooperative data, confirm that the framework can substantially reduce extreme obligations for high-risk agents while controlling harm to others.

Neural network (NN)-based nonlinear causal discovery methods recover DAG structure but leave each causal mechanism as a black box. Waxman et al. argued that extracting causal mechanisms from NN weights is ill-posed. We propose EML-CD, a framework that integrates the EML operator (capable of composing elementary functions from a single binary operator) into causal structure learning, with interpretable mechanism recovery as the primary objective. EML-CD represents each edge mechanism as a gated EML binary tree and automatically discovers closed-form causal equations. Analytical Jacobians can be directly computed from the output equations, enabling quantitative understanding of causal effects. On real data (Sachs protein signaling, d=11), EML-CD achieves SHD=11.2 +/- 0.4 (5-seed mean; baselines are single deterministic runs), on par with PC/GES within seed variance and below CAM, while attaching closed-form equations to each detected edge (precision 0.756, recall 0.365). In a controlled bivariate test with known mechanisms, EML-CD recovers 10 of 11 elementary function families faithfully (held-out shape correlation >= 0.96; only high-frequency sine is partial). On a symbolic synthetic benchmark, EML-CD attains a substantially lower and more stable held-out mechanism f-MSE than a fixed SINDy dictionary (mean 3.67 vs. 7644, the latter inflated by catastrophic extrapolation on one seed), although its structure recovery (SHD 14.0) only matches the dictionary and stays below specialized optimizers; on the Causal Chambers light-tunnel subset, a depth-2 model improves F1 over linear OLS-BIC (0.444 vs. 0.273).

Reduced-order modeling of high-dimensional dynamical systems is often hindered by the non-Markovian closure term that represents the effect of unresolved variables on the resolved dynamics. Inspired by the Mori--Zwanzig formalism, in which the closure takes the form of a memory functional of the resolved trajectory, we recast closure modeling as a sequence modeling problem and propose the Mamba-Assisted Closure (MAC) framework: a Mamba-based sequence model, trained to predict the closure from the resolved trajectory, is coupled with the reduced-order governing equations through a numerical integrator to advance the resolved variables in time. A key feature of the framework is its exploitation of the dual representation of state-space models -- the model is trained in a sequence-to-sequence fashion via the convolutional form, and deployed for step-by-step autoregressive rollout via the recurrent form, yielding both efficient long-trajectory training and constant per-step inference cost. On the viscous Burgers' equation and the chaotic two-scale Lorenz '96 system, the MAC model substantially outperforms the Markovian reduced-order model, the GRU-based sequence model, and the Wilks method in predictive accuracy and long-time rollout stability.

Missing data imputation in large-scale surveys faces two challenges that are not well handled by current tabular diffusion methods. First, \emph{structural skips}, cells made inapplicable by questionnaire design, should not be imputed but are often conflated with item nonresponse. Second, \emph{ordinal} responses encode ordered categories, yet most pipelines treat them as nominal levels through one-hot or analog-bit encodings. We introduce \textbf{TabSODA} (\textbf{Tab}ular diffusion with \textbf{S}kip pattern detection and \textbf{O}r\textbf{d}inal \textbf{A}wareness), an Expectation-Maximization (EM)-based diffusion imputer built on the Elucidated Diffusion Model (EDM) framework. TabSODA propagates structural skips through the denoising loss and reverse-time sampler, and represents ordinal variables with cumulative-probit scalar latents while retaining analog-bit encodings for nominal variables. When a codebook skip mask is available, TabSODA uses it directly; otherwise, the TabSODA+SKIP variant estimates the mask from raw responses and questionnaire order using a CART-based skip-pattern miner. On Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study and the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), two nationally representative U.S.\ surveys, TabSODA reduces ordinal MACE by up to $23.7\%$ and improves categorical accuracy by up to $9\%$ over the strongest baseline across MCAR, MAR, and MNAR masking. The skip miner achieves near-perfect precision on both datasets, allowing TabSODA+SKIP to closely track the codebook-mask variant.

When learning to walk, infants seem to address a coarse version of the problem first - stay upright, reach the caregiver - and refine it only when further practice at that resolution stops paying off. Reinforcement learning offers multiple techniques for building simple versions of complex tasks, but lacks general principles for how to dynamically adjust the granularity of these abstractions during learning. This paper proposes one such principle: refine the abstraction as soon as the learning error within it becomes comparable to the error induced by the abstraction itself. Here, we investigate one way of formalising this principle via a performance certificate that decomposes value error into two terms: a learning error bound captured by a Bellman residual, and an abstraction error bound given by a bisimulation metric. The resulting switching strategy is implemented by soft state-action abstractions built from rate-distortion principles, whose resolution along state and action axes can be continuously adjusted. We validate this construction in a range of tabular settings, showing that near-optimal performance can be achieved under substantial lossy compression of state and action information.

Modern semiparametric estimation often relies on flexible black-box machine learning methods to estimate nuisance functions, raising a fundamental question: how do nuisance estimation errors propagate into inference for low-dimensional target parameters? The dominant paradigm, exemplified by double machine learning (DML), yields error bounds in which nuisance estimation errors enter multiplicatively. While widely adopted, it remains unclear whether this multiplicative-rate dependence is optimal for black-box models. In this paper, we start by revisiting the partial linear model $Y = μ_0(X)+T\cdotβ_0+\varepsilon$ under a structure-agnostic setting, where the nuisance function $μ_0$ is estimated using a generic machine learning model, with approximation error $δ^a_μ$ and stochastic error $δ_μ^s$. We show that the standard DML rate is not optimal in the regime where the auxiliary function $\mathbb{E}[T|X=x]$ cannot be consistently estimated. We propose a new estimator for $β_0$ that achieves a sharper rate of $n^{-1/2}+δ^a_μ+(δ_μ^s)^2$ and establish a matching lower bound demonstrating its optimality. Our results reveal a new principle: the first-order stochastic error of nuisance estimation can be eliminated without imposing any additional assumptions. This also leads to a revised tuning strategy favoring under-smoothing, where $δ^a_μ\asymp(δ_μ^s)^2$, rather than the classical bias-variance trade-off $δ^a_μ\asymp δ_μ^s$. Under mild additional conditions, the estimator is asymptotically normal with minimal asymptotic variance. The proposed method extends to a broad class of semi-parametric linear functional estimation problems, including average treatment effect estimation. Our results imply that popular orthogonal score methods in semiparametric estimation with black-box nuisance learners can be substantially improved.