Recent advancements in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have focused on integrating multiple modalities, yet their ability to simultaneously process and reason across different inputs remains underexplored. We introduce OmniBench, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate models' ability to recognize, interpret, and reason across visual, acoustic, and textual inputs simultaneously. We define language models capable of such tri-modal processing as omni-language models (OLMs). OmniBench features high-quality human annotations that require integrated understanding across all modalities. Our evaluation reveals that: i) open-source OLMs show significant limitations in instruction-following and reasoning in tri-modal contexts; and ii) most baseline models perform poorly (below 50% accuracy) even with textual alternatives to image/audio inputs. To address these limitations, we develop OmniInstruct, an 96K-sample instruction tuning dataset for training OLMs. We advocate for developing more robust tri-modal integration techniques and training strategies to enhance OLM performance. Codes and data could be found at https://m-a-p.ai/OmniBench/.

We propose an inference-time scaling approach for pretrained flow models. Recently, inference-time scaling has gained significant attention in LLMs and diffusion models, improving sample quality or better aligning outputs with user preferences by leveraging additional computation. For diffusion models, particle sampling has allowed more efficient scaling due to the stochasticity at intermediate denoising steps. On the contrary, while flow models have gained popularity as an alternative to diffusion models--offering faster generation and high-quality outputs--efficient inference-time scaling methods used for diffusion models cannot be directly applied due to their deterministic generative process. To enable efficient inference-time scaling for flow models, we propose three key ideas: 1) SDE-based generation, enabling particle sampling in flow models, 2) Interpolant conversion, broadening the search space and enhancing sample diversity, and 3) Rollover Budget Forcing (RBF), an adaptive allocation of computational resources across timesteps to maximize budget utilization. Our experiments show that SDE-based generation and variance-preserving (VP) interpolant-based generation, improves the performance of particle sampling methods for inference-time scaling in flow models. Additionally, we demonstrate that RBF with VP-SDE achieves the best performance, outperforming all previous inference-time scaling approaches.

Due to the size and complexity of modern large language models (LLMs), it has proven challenging to uncover the underlying mechanisms that models use to solve reasoning problems. For instance, is their reasoning for a specific problem localized to certain parts of the network? Do they break down the reasoning problem into modular components that are then executed as sequential steps as we go deeper in the model? To better understand the reasoning capability of LLMs, we study a minimal propositional logic problem that requires combining multiple facts to arrive at a solution. By studying this problem on Mistral and Gemma models, up to 27B parameters, we illuminate the core components the models use to solve such logic problems. From a mechanistic interpretability point of view, we use causal mediation analysis to uncover the pathways and components of the LLMs' reasoning processes. Then, we offer fine-grained insights into the functions of attention heads in different layers. We not only find a sparse circuit that computes the answer, but we decompose it into sub-circuits that have four distinct and modular uses. Finally, we reveal that three distinct models -- Mistral-7B, Gemma-2-9B and Gemma-2-27B -- contain analogous but not identical mechanisms.

A key challenge is integrating these modalities of different shapes while maintaining SE(3) equivariance for 3D coordinates. To achieve this, existing approaches typically maintain separate latent spaces for invariant and equivariant modalities, reducing efficiency in both training and sampling.

Explaining graph neural networks (GNNs) is a key approach to improve the trustworthiness of GNN in high-stakes applications, such as finance and healthcare. However, existing methods are vulnerable to perturbations, raising concerns about explanation reliability. Prior methods enhance explanation robustness using model retraining or explanation ensemble, with certain weaknesses. Retraining leads to models that are different from the original target model and misleading explanations, while ensemble can produce contradictory results due to different inputs or models. To improve explanation robustness without the above weaknesses, we take an unexplored route and exploit the two edge geometry properties curvature and resistance to enhance explanation robustness. We are the first to prove that these geometric notions can be used to bound explanation robustness. We design a general optimization algorithm to incorporate these geometric properties into a wide spectrum of base GNN explanation methods to enhance the robustness of base explanations. We empirically show that our method outperforms six base explanation methods in robustness across nine datasets spanning node classification, link prediction, and graph classification tasks, improving fidelity in 80\% of the cases and achieving up to a 10\% relative improvement in robust performance.

Current AIGC detectors often achieve near-perfect accuracy on images produced by the same generator used for training but struggle to generalize to outputs from unseen generators. We trace this failure in part to latent prior bias: detectors learn shortcuts tied to patterns stemming from the initial noise vector rather than learning robust generative artifacts. To address this, we propose \textbf{On-Manifold Adversarial Training (OMAT)}: by optimizing the initial latent noise of diffusion models under fixed conditioning, we generate \emph{on-manifold} adversarial examples that remain on the generator's output manifold--unlike pixel-space attacks, which introduce off-manifold perturbations that the generator itself cannot reproduce and that can obscure the true discriminative artifacts. To test against state-of-the-art generative models, we introduce GenImage++, a test-only benchmark of outputs from advanced generators (Flux.1, SD3) with extended prompts and diverse styles. We apply our adversarial-training paradigm to ResNet50 and CLIP baselines and evaluate across existing AIGC forensic benchmarks and recent challenge datasets. Extensive experiments show that adversarially trained detectors significantly improve cross-generator performance without any network redesign.

It is difficult to evaluate machine learning classifiers without large labeled datasets, which are often unavailable. In contrast, unlabeled data is plentiful, but not easily used for evaluation. Here, we introduce Semi-Supervised Model Evaluation (SSME), a method that uses both labeled and unlabeled data to evaluate machine learning classifiers. The key idea is to estimate the joint distribution of ground truth labels and classifier scores using a semi-supervised mixture model. The semi-supervised mixture model allows SSME to learn from three sources of information: unlabeled data, multiple classifiers, and probabilistic classifier scores. Once fit, the mixture model enables estimation of any metric that is a function of classifier scores and ground truth labels (e.g., accuracy or AUC). We derive theoretical bounds on the error of these estimates, showing that estimation error decreases with the number of classifiers and the amount of unlabeled data. We present experiments in four domains where obtaining large labeled datasets is often impractical: healthcare, content moderation, molecular property prediction, and text classification. Our results demonstrate that SSME estimates performance more accurately than do competing methods, reducing error by 5.1x relative to using labeled data alone and 2.4x relative to the next best method.

Current camouflaged object detection methods predominantly follow discriminative segmentation paradigms and heavily rely on predefined categories present in the training data, limiting their generalization to unseen or emerging camouflage objects. This limitation is further compounded by the labor-intensive and time-consuming nature of collecting camouflage imagery. Although Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) show potential to improve such issues with their powerful generative capabilities, their understanding of camouflage scenes is still insufficient. To bridge this gap, we introduce MMCSBench, the first comprehensive multimodal benchmark designed to evaluate and advance LVLM capabilities in camouflage scenes. MMCSBench comprises 22,537 images and 76,843 corresponding image-text pairs across five fine-grained camouflage tasks. Additionally, we propose a new task, Camouflage Efficacy Assessment (CEA), aimed at quantitatively evaluating the camouflage effectiveness of objects in images and enabling automated collection of camouflage images from large-scale databases. Extensive experiments on 26 LVLMs reveal significant shortcomings in models' ability to perceive and interpret camouflage scenes. These findings highlight the fundamental differences between natural and camouflaged visual inputs, offering insights for future research in advancing LVLM capabilities within this challenging domain.

Long reasoning models (LRMs) such as OpenAI's o1 and DeepSeek's R1 have demonstrated remarkable abilities in complex reasoning tasks by scaling test-time compute and exhibiting human-like deep thinking. However, we identify a phenomenon we term underthinking, where LRMs frequently switch between different reasoning thoughts without sufficiently exploring promising paths to reach a correct solution. This behavior leads to inadequate depth of reasoning and decreased performance, particularly on challenging mathematical problems. To systematically analyze this issue, we conduct experiments on three challenging test sets and two representative open-source LRMs, revealing that frequent thought switching correlates with incorrect responses. We introduce a novel metric to quantify underthinking by measuring token efficiency in incorrect answers. To address underthinking, we propose a decoding strategy with thought switching penalty (Tip) that discourages premature transitions between thoughts, encouraging deeper exploration of each reasoning path. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach improves accuracy across challenging datasets without requiring model fine-tuning. Our findings contribute to understanding reasoning inefficiencies in LRMs and offer a practical solution to enhance their problem-solving capabilities.

Affective brain-computer interfaces (aBCIs) play a crucial role in personalized human-computer interaction and neurofeedback modulation. To develop practical and effective aBCI paradigms and to investigate the spatial-temporal dynamics of brain activity under emotional inducement, portable electroencephalography (EEG) signals have been widely adopted. To further enhance spatial-temporal perception, functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has attracted increasing interest in the aBCI field and has been explored in combination with EEG. However, existing datasets typically provide only static fixation labels, overlooking the dynamic changes in subjects' emotions. Notably, some studies have attempted to collect continuously annotated emotional data, but they have recorded only peripheral physiological signals without directly observing brain activity, limiting insight into underlying neural states under different emotions.