In this paper, we introduce a novel variation of multi-armed bandits called bandits with ranking feedback. Unlike traditional bandits, this variation provides feedback to the learner that allows them to rank the arms based on previous pulls, without quantifying numerically the difference in performance. This type of feedback is well-suited for scenarios where the arms' values cannot be precisely measured using metrics such as monetary scores, probabilities, or occurrences. Common examples include human preferences in matchmaking problems. Furthermore, its investigation answers the theoretical question on how numerical rewards are crucial in bandit settings.

Online paging is a fundamental problem in the field of online algorithms, in which one maintains a cache of slots as requests for fetching pages arrive online. In the weighted variant of this problem, each page has its own fetching cost; a substantial line of work on this problem culminated in an (optimal) (log)-competitive randomized algorithm, due to Bansal, Buchbinder and Naor (FOCS'07). Existing work for weighted paging assumes that page weights are known in advance, which is not always the case in practice. For example, in multi-level caching architectures, the expected cost of fetching a memory block is a function of its probability of being in a mid-level cache rather than the main memory. This complex property cannot be predicted in advance; over time, however, one may glean information about page weights through sampling their fetching cost multiple times. We present the first algorithm for online weighted paging that does not know page weights in advance, but rather learns from weight samples. In terms of techniques, this requires providing (integral) samples to a fractional solver, requiring a delicate interface between this solver and the randomized rounding scheme; we believe that our work can inspire online algorithms to other problems that involve cost sampling.

We study the performance guarantees of exploration-free greedy algorithms for the linear contextual bandit problem. We introduce a novel condition, named the Local Anti-Concentration (LAC) condition, which enables a greedy bandit algorithm to achieve provable efficiency. We show that the LAC condition is satisfied by a broad class of distributions, including Gaussian, exponential, uniform, Cauchy, and Student's t distributions, along with other exponential family distributions and their truncated variants. This significantly expands the class of distributions under which greedy algorithms can perform efficiently. Under our proposed LAC condition, we prove that the cumulative expected regret of the greedy algorithm for the linear contextual bandit is bounded by O(poly log T). Our results establish the widest range of distributions known to date that allow a sublinear regret bound for greedy algorithms, further achieving a sharp poly-logarithmic regret.

Real-life contractual relations typically involve repeated interactions between the principal and agent, where, despite theoretical appeal, players rarely use complex dynamic strategies and instead manage uncertainty through learning algorithms. In this paper, we initiate the study of repeated contracts with learning agents, focusing on those achieving no-regret outcomes. For the canonical setting where the agent's actions result in success or failure, we present a simple, optimal solution for the principal: Initially provide a linear contract with scalar α > 0, then switch to a zero-scalar contract. This shift causes the agent to "free-fall" through their action space, yielding non-zero rewards for the principal at zero cost. Interestingly, despite the apparent exploitation, there are instances where our dynamic contract can make both players better off compared to the best static contract. We then broaden the scope of our results to general linearly-scaled contracts, and, finally, to the best of our knowledge, we provide the first analysis of optimization against learning agents with uncertainty about the time horizon.

We study online Bayesian persuasion problems in which an informed sender repeatedly faces a receiver with the goal of influencing their behavior through the provision of payoff-relevant information. Previous works assume that the sender has knowledge about either the prior distribution over states of nature or receiver's utilities, or both. We relax such unrealistic assumptions by considering settings in which the sender does not know anything about the prior and the receiver. We design an algorithm that achieves sublinear--in the number of rounds--regret with respect to an optimal signaling scheme, and we also provide a collection of lower bounds showing that the guarantees of such an algorithm are tight. Our algorithm works by searching a suitable space of signaling schemes in order to learn receiver's best responses. To do this, we leverage a non-standard representation of signaling schemes that allows to cleverly overcome the challenge of not knowing anything about the prior over states of nature and receiver's utilities. Finally, our results also allow to derive lower/upper bounds on the sample complexity of learning signaling schemes in a related Bayesian persuasion PAC-learning problem.

In the adaptive setting, many multi-armed bandit applications allow the learner to adaptively draw samples and adjust sampling strategy in rounds. In many real applications, not only the query complexity but also the round complexity need to be optimized. In this paper, we study both PAC and exact top-k arm identification problems and design efficient algorithms considering both round complexity and query complexity.

Contextual bandit algorithms are applied in a wide range of domains, from advertising to recommender systems, from clinical trials to education. In many of these domains, malicious agents may have incentives to force a bandit algorithm into a desired behavior. For instance, an unscrupulous ad publisher may try to increase their own revenue at the expense of the advertisers; a seller may want to increase the exposure of their products, or thwart a competitor's advertising campaign. In this paper, we study several attack scenarios and show that a malicious agent can force a linear contextual bandit algorithm to pull any desired arm T o(T) times over a horizon of T steps, while applying adversarial modifications to either rewards or contexts with a cumulative cost that only grow logarithmically as O(log T). We also investigate the case when a malicious agent is interested in affecting the behavior of the bandit algorithm in a single context (e.g., a specific user). We first provide sufficient conditions for the feasibility of the attack and an efficient algorithm to perform an attack. We empirically validate the proposed approaches in synthetic and real-world datasets.

Bandit algorithms have various application in safety-critical systems, where it is important to respect the system constraints that rely on the bandit's unknown parameters at every round. In this paper, we formulate a linear stochastic multiarmed bandit problem with safety constraints that depend (linearly) on an unknown parameter vector. As such, the learner is unable to identify all safe actions and must act conservatively in ensuring that her actions satisfy the safety constraint at all rounds (at least with high probability). For these bandits, we propose a new UCB-based algorithm called Safe-LUCB, which includes necessary modifications to respect safety constraints. The algorithm has two phases. During the pure exploration phase the learner chooses her actions at random from a restricted set of safe actions with the goal of learning a good approximation of the entire unknown safe set. Once this goal is achieved, the algorithm begins a safe explorationexploitation phase where the learner gradually expands their estimate of the set of safe actions while controlling the growth of regret. We provide a general regret bound for the algorithm, as well as a problem dependent bound that is connected to the location of the optimal action within the safe set. We then propose a modified heuristic that exploits our problem dependent analysis to improve the regret.

Theoretical analysis confirms that the proposed algorithm achieves sub-linear regret in relation to the number of rounds and arms.

Hierarchical Bayesian bandit refers to the multi-task bandit problem in which bandit tasks are assumed to be drawn from the same distribution. In this work, we provide improved Bayes regret bounds for hierarchical Bayesian bandit algorithms in the multi-task linear bandit and semi-bandit settings. For the multi-task linear bandit, we first analyze the preexisting hierarchical Thompson sampling (HierTS) algorithm, and improve its gap-independent Bayes regret bound from O(m n log n log (mn)) to O(m n log n) in the case of infinite action set, with m being the number of tasks and n the number of iterations per task. In the case of finite action set, we propose a novel hierarchical Bayesian bandit algorithm, named hierarchical BayesUCB (HierBayesUCB), that achieves the logarithmic but gap-dependent regret bound O(m log (mn) log n) under mild assumptions. All of the above regret bounds hold in many variants of hierarchical Bayesian linear bandit problem, including when the tasks are solved sequentially or concurrently. Furthermore, we extend the aforementioned HierTS and HierBayesUCB algorithms to the multi-task combinatorial semi-bandit setting. Concretely, our combinatorial HierTS algorithm attains comparable Bayes regret bound O(m n log n) with respect to the latest one. Moreover, our combinatorial HierBayesUCB yields a sharper Bayes regret bound O(m log (mn) log n). Experiments are conducted to validate the soundness of our theoretical results for multi-task bandit algorithms.