Bayesian Inference
Hierarchical Infinite Relational Model
Saad, Feras A., Mansinghka, Vikash K.
This paper describes the hierarchical infinite relational model (HIRM), a new probabilistic generative model for noisy, sparse, and heterogeneous relational data. Given a set of relations defined over a collection of domains, the model first infers multiple non-overlapping clusters of relations using a top-level Chinese restaurant process. Within each cluster of relations, a Dirichlet process mixture is then used to partition the domain entities and model the probability distribution of relation values. The HIRM generalizes the standard infinite relational model and can be used for a variety of data analysis tasks including dependence detection, clustering, and density estimation. We present new algorithms for fully Bayesian posterior inference via Gibbs sampling. We illustrate the efficacy of the method on a density estimation benchmark of twenty object-attribute datasets with up to 18 million cells and use it to discover relational structure in real-world datasets from politics and genomics.
What Are Probabilistic Models in Machine Learning?
Probabilistic Models in Machine Learning is the use of the codes of statistics to data examination. It was one of the initial methods of machine learning. It's quite extensively used to this day. Individual of the best-known algorithms in this group is the Naive Bayes algorithm. Probabilistic modelling delivers a framework for accepting what learning is.
Minimising quantifier variance under prior probability shift
For the binary prevalence quantification problem under prior probability shift, we determine the asymptotic variance of the maximum likelihood estimator. We find that it is a function of the Brier score for the regression of the class label against the features under the test data set distribution. This observation suggests that optimising the accuracy of a base classifier on the training data set helps to reduce the variance of the related quantifier on the test data set. Therefore, we also point out training criteria for the base classifier that imply optimisation of both of the Brier scores on the training and the test data sets.
Bayesian Parameter Estimations for Grey System Models in Online Traffic Speed Predictions
Comert, Gurcan, Begashaw, Negash, Medhin, Negash G.
This paper presents Bayesian parameter estimation for first order Grey system models' parameters (or sometimes referred to as hyperparameters). There are different forms of first-order Grey System Models. These include $GM(1,1)$, $GM(1,1| \cos(\omega t)$, $GM(1,1| \sin(\omega t)$, and $GM(1,1| \cos(\omega t), \sin(\omega t)$. The whitenization equation of these models is a first-order linear differential equation of the form \[ \frac{dx}{dt} + a x = f(t) \] where $a$ is a parameter and $f(t) = b$ in $GM(1,1|)$ , $f(t) = b_1\cos(\omega t) + b_2$ in $GM(1,1| cos(\omega t)$, $f(t) = b_1\sin(\omega t)+b_2$ in $GM(1,1| \sin(\omega t)$, $f(t) = b_1\sin(\omega t) + b_2\cos(\omega t) + b_3$ in $GM(1,1| \cos(\omega t), \sin(\omega t)$, $f(t) = b x^2$ in Grey Verhulst model (GVM), and where $b, b_1, b_2$, and $b_3$ are parameters. The results from Bayesian estimations are compared to the least square estimated models with fixed $\omega$. We found that using rolling Bayesian estimations for GM parameters can allow us to estimate the parameters in all possible forms. Based on the data used for the comparison, the numerical results showed that models with Bayesian parameter estimations are up to 45\% more accurate in mean squared errors.
A fast asynchronous MCMC sampler for sparse Bayesian inference
We propose a very fast approximate Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling framework that is applicable to a large class of sparse Bayesian inference problems, where the computational cost per iteration in several models is of order $O(ns)$, where $n$ is the sample size, and $s$ the underlying sparsity of the model. This cost can be further reduced by data sub-sampling when stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics are employed. The algorithm is an extension of the asynchronous Gibbs sampler of Johnson et al. (2013), but can be viewed from a statistical perspective as a form of Bayesian iterated sure independent screening (Fan et al. (2009)). We show that in high-dimensional linear regression problems, the Markov chain generated by the proposed algorithm admits an invariant distribution that recovers correctly the main signal with high probability under some statistical assumptions. Furthermore we show that its mixing time is at most linear in the number of regressors. We illustrate the algorithm with several models.
Random Subspace Mixture Models for Interpretable Anomaly Detection
Savkli, Cetin, Schwartz, Catherine
We present a new subspace-based method to construct probabilistic models for high-dimensional data and highlight its use in anomaly detection. The approach is based on a statistical estimation of probability density using densities of random subspaces combined with geometric averaging. In selecting random subspaces, equal representation of each attribute is used to ensure correct statistical limits. Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) are used to create the probability densities for each subspace with techniques included to mitigate singularities allowing for the ability to handle both numerical and categorial attributes. The number of components for each GMM is determined automatically through Bayesian information criterion to prevent overfitting. The proposed algorithm attains competitive AUC scores compared with prominent algorithms against benchmark anomaly detection datasets with the added benefits of being simple, scalable, and interpretable.
What Is Expected Loss and How Does High School Calculus Play Into It?
In machine learning and statistics, computing the accuracy, or loss, of a model is crucial for understanding the quality of the model and what improvements can be made to increase accuracy. Typically, researchers choose a loss function de- pending on their task, and this loss function runs over their test set of data, after training. However, in many cases, researchers want an estimation of their loss either before they test it or in cases when testing data is not yet available. This estimation is known as expected loss, or risk, and is usually utilized in order to assess how precarious an action or event will be. The foundations of Bayesian statistics are rooted in Bayes' Theorem, a theorem developed by Thomas Bayes who was an English mathematician and theologian during the 1700s.
Bayesian hierarchical stacking: Some models are (somewhere) useful « Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science
Stacking is a widely used model averaging technique that asymptotically yields optimal predictions among linear averages. We show that stacking is most effective when model predictive performance is heterogeneous in inputs, and we can further improve the stacked mixture with a hierarchical model. We generalize stacking to Bayesian hierarchical stacking. The model weights are varying as a function of data, partially-pooled, and inferred using Bayesian inference. We further incorporate discrete and continuous inputs, other structured priors, and time series and longitudinal data.
Scalable3-BO: Big Data meets HPC - A scalable asynchronous parallel high-dimensional Bayesian optimization framework on supercomputers
Bayesian optimization (BO) is a flexible and powerful framework that is suitable for computationally expensive simulation-based applications and guarantees statistical convergence to the global optimum. While remaining as one of the most popular optimization methods, its capability is hindered by the size of data, the dimensionality of the considered problem, and the nature of sequential optimization. These scalability issues are intertwined with each other and must be tackled simultaneously. In this work, we propose the Scalable$^3$-BO framework, which employs sparse GP as the underlying surrogate model to scope with Big Data and is equipped with a random embedding to efficiently optimize high-dimensional problems with low effective dimensionality. The Scalable$^3$-BO framework is further leveraged with asynchronous parallelization feature, which fully exploits the computational resource on HPC within a computational budget. As a result, the proposed Scalable$^3$-BO framework is scalable in three independent perspectives: with respect to data size, dimensionality, and computational resource on HPC. The goal of this work is to push the frontiers of BO beyond its well-known scalability issues and minimize the wall-clock waiting time for optimizing high-dimensional computationally expensive applications. We demonstrate the capability of Scalable$^3$-BO with 1 million data points, 10,000-dimensional problems, with 20 concurrent workers in an HPC environment.
Asymptotic optimality and minimal complexity of classification by random projection
Boutin, Mireille, Coupkova, Evzenie
The generalization error of a classifier is related to the complexity of the set of functions among which the classifier is chosen. Roughly speaking, the more complex the family, the greater the potential disparity between the training error and the population error of the classifier. This principle is embodied in layman's terms by Occam's razor principle, which suggests favoring low-complexity hypotheses over complex ones. We study a family of low-complexity classifiers consisting of thresholding the one-dimensional feature obtained by projecting the data on a random line after embedding it into a higher dimensional space parametrized by monomials of order up to k. More specifically, the extended data is projected n-times and the best classifier among those n (based on its performance on training data) is chosen. We obtain a bound on the generalization error of these low-complexity classifiers. The bound is less than that of any classifier with a non-trivial VC dimension, and thus less than that of a linear classifier. We also show that, given full knowledge of the class conditional densities, the error of the classifiers would converge to the optimal (Bayes) error as k and n go to infinity; if only a training dataset is given, we show that the classifiers will perfectly classify all the training points as k and n go to infinity.