Multimodal regression is a fundamental task, which integrates the information from different sources to improve the performance of follow-up applications. However, existing methods mainly focus on improving the performance and often ignore the confidence of prediction for diverse situations. In this study, we are devoted to trustworthy multimodal regression which is critical in cost-sensitive domains. To this end, we introduce a novel Mixture of Normal-Inverse Gamma distributions (MoNIG) algorithm, which efficiently estimates uncertainty in principle for adaptive integration of different modalities and produces a trustworthy regression result. Our model can be dynamically aware of uncertainty for each modality, and also robust for corrupted modalities. Furthermore, the proposed MoNIG ensures explicitly representation of (modality-specific/global) epistemic and aleatoric uncertainties, respectively. Experimental results on both synthetic and different real-world data demonstrate the effectiveness and trustworthiness of our method on various multimodal regression tasks (e.g., temperature prediction for superconductivity, relative location prediction for CT slices, and multimodal sentiment analysis).

The two most commonly used criteria for assessing causal model discovery with artificial data are edit-distance and Kullback-Leibler divergence, measured from the true model to the learned model. Both of these metrics maximally reward the true model. However, we argue that they are both insufficiently discriminating in judging the relative merits of false models. Edit distance, for example, fails to distinguish between strong and weak probabilistic dependencies. KL divergence, on the other hand, rewards equally all statistically equivalent models, regardless of their different causal claims. We propose an augmented KL divergence, which we call Causal KL (CKL), which takes into account causal relationships which distinguish between observationally equivalent models. Results are presented for three variants of CKL, showing that Causal KL works well in practice.

Learning in uncertain, noisy, or adversarial environments is a challenging task for deep neural networks (DNNs). We propose a new theoretically grounded and efficient approach for robust learning that builds upon Bayesian estimation and Variational Inference. We formulate the problem of density propagation through layers of a DNN and solve it using an Ensemble Density Propagation (EnDP) scheme. The EnDP approach allows us to propagate moments of the variational probability distribution across the layers of a Bayesian DNN, enabling the estimation of the mean and covariance of the predictive distribution at the output of the model. Our experiments using MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets show a significant improvement in the robustness of the trained models to random noise and adversarial attacks.

Machine learning models have achieved human-level performance on various tasks. This success comes at a high cost of computation and storage overhead, which makes machine learning algorithms difficult to deploy on edge devices. Typically, one has to partially sacrifice accuracy in favor of an increased performance quantified in terms of reduced memory usage and energy consumption. Current methods compress the networks by reducing the precision of the parameters or by eliminating redundant ones. In this paper, we propose a new insight into network compression through the Bayesian framework. We show that Bayesian neural networks automatically discover redundancy in model parameters, thus enabling self-compression, which is linked to the propagation of uncertainty through the layers of the network. Our experimental results show that the network architecture can be successfully compressed by deleting parameters identified by the network itself while retaining the same level of accuracy.

Trusted Research environments (TRE)s are safe and secure environments in which researchers can access sensitive data. With the growth and diversity of medical data such as Electronic Health Records (EHR), Medical Imaging and Genomic data, there is an increase in the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in general and the subfield of Machine Learning (ML) in particular in the healthcare domain. This generates the desire to disclose new types of outputs from TREs, such as trained machine learning models. Although specific guidelines and policies exists for statistical disclosure controls in TREs, they do not satisfactorily cover these new types of output request. In this paper, we define some of the challenges around the application and disclosure of machine learning for healthcare within TREs. We describe various vulnerabilities the introduction of AI brings to TREs. We also provide an introduction to the different types and levels of risks associated with the disclosure of trained ML models. We finally describe the new research opportunities in developing and adapting policies and tools for safely disclosing machine learning outputs from TREs.

The Internet of Things (IoT) is on the verge of a major paradigm shift. In the IoT system of the future, IoFT, the cloud will be substituted by the crowd where model training is brought to the edge, allowing IoT devices to collaboratively extract knowledge and build smart analytics/models while keeping their personal data stored locally. This paradigm shift was set into motion by the tremendous increase in computational power on IoT devices and the recent advances in decentralized and privacy-preserving model training, coined as federated learning (FL). This article provides a vision for IoFT and a systematic overview of current efforts towards realizing this vision. Specifically, we first introduce the defining characteristics of IoFT and discuss FL data-driven approaches, opportunities, and challenges that allow decentralized inference within three dimensions: (i) a global model that maximizes utility across all IoT devices, (ii) a personalized model that borrows strengths across all devices yet retains its own model, (iii) a meta-learning model that quickly adapts to new devices or learning tasks. We end by describing the vision and challenges of IoFT in reshaping different industries through the lens of domain experts. Those industries include manufacturing, transportation, energy, healthcare, quality & reliability, business, and computing.

We consider the problem of time series forecasting in an adaptive setting. We focus on the inference of state-space models under unknown and potentially time-varying noise variances. We introduce an augmented model in which the variances are represented as auxiliary gaussian latent variables in a tracking mode. As variances are nonnegative, a transformation is chosen and applied to these latent variables. The inference relies on the online variational Bayesian methodology, which consists in minimizing a Kullback-Leibler divergence at each time step. We observe that the minimum of the Kullback-Leibler divergence is an extension of the Kalman filter taking into account the variance uncertainty. We design a novel algorithm, named Viking, using these optimal recursive updates. For auxiliary latent variables, we use second-order bounds whose optimum admit closed-form solutions. Experiments on synthetic data show that Viking behaves well and is robust to misspecification.

During the past two decades, methods for identifying groups with different trends in longitudinal data have become of increasing interest across many areas of research. To support researchers, we summarize the guidance from the literature regarding longitudinal clustering. Moreover, we present a selection of methods for longitudinal clustering, including group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM), growth mixture modeling (GMM), and longitudinal k-means (KML). The methods are introduced at a basic level, and strengths, limitations, and model extensions are listed. Following the recent developments in data collection, attention is given to the applicability of these methods to intensive longitudinal data (ILD). We demonstrate the application of the methods on a synthetic dataset using packages available in R.

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have become increasingly popular in many areas. Nevertheless, AI technologies are still in their developing stages, and many issues need to be addressed. Among those, the reliability of AI systems needs to be demonstrated so that the AI systems can be used with confidence by the general public. In this paper, we provide statistical perspectives on the reliability of AI systems. Different from other considerations, the reliability of AI systems focuses on the time dimension. That is, the system can perform its designed functionality for the intended period. We introduce a so-called SMART statistical framework for AI reliability research, which includes five components: Structure of the system, Metrics of reliability, Analysis of failure causes, Reliability assessment, and Test planning. We review traditional methods in reliability data analysis and software reliability, and discuss how those existing methods can be transformed for reliability modeling and assessment of AI systems. We also describe recent developments in modeling and analysis of AI reliability and outline statistical research challenges in this area, including out-of-distribution detection, the effect of the training set, adversarial attacks, model accuracy, and uncertainty quantification, and discuss how those topics can be related to AI reliability, with illustrative examples. Finally, we discuss data collection and test planning for AI reliability assessment and how to improve system designs for higher AI reliability. The paper closes with some concluding remarks.

We derive information-theoretic lower bounds on the Bayes risk and generalization error of realizable machine learning models. In particular, we employ an analysis in which the rate-distortion function of the model parameters bounds the required mutual information between the training samples and the model parameters in order to learn a model up to a Bayes risk constraint. For realizable models, we show that both the rate distortion function and mutual information admit expressions that are convenient for analysis. For models that are (roughly) lower Lipschitz in their parameters, we bound the rate distortion function from below, whereas for VC classes, the mutual information is bounded above by $d_\mathrm{vc}\log(n)$. When these conditions match, the Bayes risk with respect to the zero-one loss scales no faster than $\Omega(d_\mathrm{vc}/n)$, which matches known outer bounds and minimax lower bounds up to logarithmic factors. We also consider the impact of label noise, providing lower bounds when training and/or test samples are corrupted.