Bayesian Inference
Recent Advances in Bayesian Optimization
Wang, Xilu, Jin, Yaochu, Schmitt, Sebastian, Olhofer, Markus
Bayesian optimization has emerged at the forefront of expensive black-box optimization due to its data efficiency. Recent years have witnessed a proliferation of studies on the development of new Bayesian optimization algorithms and their applications. Hence, this paper attempts to provide a comprehensive and updated survey of recent advances in Bayesian optimization and identify interesting open problems. We categorize the existing work on Bayesian optimization into nine main groups according to the motivations and focus of the proposed algorithms. For each category, we present the main advances with respect to the construction of surrogate models and adaptation of the acquisition functions. Finally, we discuss the open questions and suggest promising future research directions, in particular with regard to heterogeneity, privacy preservation, and fairness in distributed and federated optimization systems.
Understanding Approximation for Bayesian Inference in Neural Networks
Bayesian inference has theoretical attractions as a principled framework for reasoning about beliefs. However, the motivations of Bayesian inference which claim it to be the only 'rational' kind of reasoning do not apply in practice. They create a binary split in which all approximate inference is equally 'irrational'. Instead, we should ask ourselves how to define a spectrum of more- and less-rational reasoning that explains why we might prefer one Bayesian approximation to another. I explore approximate inference in Bayesian neural networks and consider the unintended interactions between the probabilistic model, approximating distribution, optimization algorithm, and dataset. The complexity of these interactions highlights the difficulty of any strategy for evaluating Bayesian approximations which focuses entirely on the method, outside the context of specific datasets and decision-problems. For given applications, the expected utility of the approximate posterior can measure inference quality. To assess a model's ability to incorporate different parts of the Bayesian framework we can identify desirable characteristic behaviours of Bayesian reasoning and pick decision-problems that make heavy use of those behaviours. Here, we use continual learning (testing the ability to update sequentially) and active learning (testing the ability to represent credence). But existing continual and active learning set-ups pose challenges that have nothing to do with posterior quality which can distort their ability to evaluate Bayesian approximations. These unrelated challenges can be removed or reduced, allowing better evaluation of approximate inference methods.
The Implicit Delta Method
Kallus, Nathan, McInerney, James
Epistemic uncertainty quantification is a crucial part of drawing credible conclusions from predictive models, whether concerned about the prediction at a given point or any downstream evaluation that uses the model as input. When the predictive model is simple and its evaluation differentiable, this task is solved by the delta method, where we propagate the asymptotically-normal uncertainty in the predictive model through the evaluation to compute standard errors and Wald confidence intervals. However, this becomes difficult when the model and/or evaluation becomes more complex. Remedies include the bootstrap, but it can be computationally infeasible when training the model even once is costly. In this paper, we propose an alternative, the implicit delta method, which works by infinitesimally regularizing the training loss of the predictive model to automatically assess downstream uncertainty. We show that the change in the evaluation due to regularization is consistent for the asymptotic variance of the evaluation estimator, even when the infinitesimal change is approximated by a finite difference. This provides both a reliable quantification of uncertainty in terms of standard errors as well as permits the construction of calibrated confidence intervals. We discuss connections to other approaches to uncertainty quantification, both Bayesian and frequentist, and demonstrate our approach empirically.
Materials Property Prediction with Uncertainty Quantification: A Benchmark Study
Varivoda, Daniel, Dong, Rongzhi, Omee, Sadman Sadeed, Hu, Jianjun
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) has increasing importance in building robust high-performance and generalizable materials property prediction models. It can also be used in active learning to train better models by focusing on getting new training data from uncertain regions. There are several categories of UQ methods each considering different types of uncertainty sources. Here we conduct a comprehensive evaluation on the UQ methods for graph neural network based materials property prediction and evaluate how they truly reflect the uncertainty that we want in error bound estimation or active learning. Our experimental results over four crystal materials datasets (including formation energy, adsorption energy, total energy, and band gap properties) show that the popular ensemble methods for uncertainty estimation is NOT the best choice for UQ in materials property prediction. For the convenience of the community, all the source code and data sets can be accessed freely at \url{https://github.com/usccolumbia/materialsUQ}.
A hybrid data driven-physics constrained Gaussian process regression framework with deep kernel for uncertainty quantification
In many practical fields like engineering, finance and physics, we need to explore the effects of uncertainties borne by input or parameters, which is the task of the uncertainty quantification (UQ). In a specific UQ problem, if the system is represented as stochastic partial differential equations, then stochastic Galerkin methods like generalised polynomial chaos (gPC) [29] can be used to obtain statistics of the distribution of the unknown solution. As long as a numerical or analytical solver for the system is available, the renowned Monte Carlo (MC) method [8] can be applied to obtain a distribution of the quantities of interest. However, that is usually prohibitively expensive due to the slow convergence of the Monte Carlo method, despite the fact that the running of the computer code for solving some complicated systems one single time might take days. Thus, to some extent we may be willing to compromise accuracy to reduce running time through formulating a cheap surrogate [2].
Switching Attention in Time-Varying Environments via Bayesian Inference of Abstractions
Booker, Meghan, Majumdar, Anirudha
Motivated by the goal of endowing robots with a means for focusing attention in order to operate reliably in complex, uncertain, and time-varying environments, we consider how a robot can (i) determine which portions of its environment to pay attention to at any given point in time, (ii) infer changes in context (e.g., task or environment dynamics), and (iii) switch its attention accordingly. In this work, we tackle these questions by modeling context switches in a time-varying Markov decision process (MDP) framework. We utilize the theory of bisimulation-based state abstractions in order to synthesize mechanisms for paying attention to context-relevant information. We then present an algorithm based on Bayesian inference for detecting changes in the robot's context (task or environment dynamics) as it operates online, and use this to trigger switches between different abstraction-based attention mechanisms. Our approach is demonstrated on two examples: (i) an illustrative discrete-state tracking problem, and (ii) a continuous-state tracking problem implemented on a quadrupedal hardware platform. These examples demonstrate the ability of our approach to detect context switches online and robustly ignore task-irrelevant distractors by paying attention to context-relevant information.
Truncated proposals for scalable and hassle-free simulation-based inference
Deistler, Michael, Goncalves, Pedro J, Macke, Jakob H
Simulation-based inference (SBI) solves statistical inverse problems by repeatedly running a stochastic simulator and inferring posterior distributions from model-simulations. To improve simulation efficiency, several inference methods take a sequential approach and iteratively adapt the proposal distributions from which model simulations are generated. However, many of these sequential methods are difficult to use in practice, both because the resulting optimisation problems can be challenging and efficient diagnostic tools are lacking. To overcome these issues, we present Truncated Sequential Neural Posterior Estimation (TSNPE). TSNPE performs sequential inference with truncated proposals, sidestepping the optimisation issues of alternative approaches. In addition, TSNPE allows to efficiently perform coverage tests that can scale to complex models with many parameters. We demonstrate that TSNPE performs on par with previous methods on established benchmark tasks. We then apply TSNPE to two challenging problems from neuroscience and show that TSNPE can successfully obtain the posterior distributions, whereas previous methods fail. Overall, our results demonstrate that TSNPE is an efficient, accurate, and robust inference method that can scale to challenging scientific models.
Quantifying Complexity: An Object-Relations Approach to Complex Systems
The best way to model, understand, and quantify the information contained in complex systems is an open question in physics, mathematics, and computer science. The uncertain relationship between entropy and complexity further complicates this question. With ideas drawn from the object-relations theory of psychology, this paper develops an object-relations model of complex systems which generalizes to systems of all types, including mathematical operations, machines, biological organisms, and social structures. The resulting Complex Information Entropy (CIE) equation is a robust method to quantify complexity across various contexts. The paper also describes algorithms to iteratively update and improve approximate solutions to the CIE equation, to recursively infer the composition of complex systems, and to discover the connections among objects across different lengthscales and timescales. Applications are discussed in the fields of engineering design, atomic and molecular physics, chemistry, materials science, neuroscience, psychology, sociology, ecology, economics, and medicine.
Application-Driven Learning: A Closed-Loop Prediction and Optimization Approach Applied to Dynamic Reserves and Demand Forecasting
Garcia, Joaquim Dias, Street, Alexandre, Homem-de-Mello, Tito, Muñoz, Francisco D.
Forecasting and decision-making are generally modeled as two sequential steps with no feedback, following an open-loop approach. In this paper, we present application-driven learning, a new closed-loop framework in which the processes of forecasting and decision-making are merged and co-optimized through a bilevel optimization problem. We present our methodology in a general format and prove that the solution converges to the best estimator in terms of the expected cost of the selected application. Then, we propose two solution methods: an exact method based on the KKT conditions of the second-level problem and a scalable heuristic approach suitable for decomposition methods. The proposed methodology is applied to the relevant problem of defining dynamic reserve requirements and conditional load forecasts, offering an alternative approach to current \emph{ad hoc} procedures implemented in industry practices. We benchmark our methodology with the standard sequential least-squares forecast and dispatch planning process. We apply the proposed methodology to an illustrative system and to a wide range of instances, from dozens of buses to large-scale realistic systems with thousands of buses. Our results show that the proposed methodology is scalable and yields consistently better performance than the standard open-loop approach.