Decomposition is an effective technique for solving discrete Constraint Optimization Problems (COPs) with low tree-width. On problems with high treewidth, however, existing decomposition algorithms offer little advantage over branch and bound search (B&B). In this paper we propose a method for exploiting decomposition on problems with high treewidth. Our technique involves modifying B&B to detect and exploit decomposition on a selected subset of the problem’s objectives. Decompositions over this subset, generated during search, are exploited to compute tighter bounds allowing B&B to prune more of its search space. We present a heuristic for selecting an appropriate subset of objectives—one that readily decomposes during search and yet can still provide good bounds. We demonstrate empirically that our approach can significantly improve B&B’s performance and outperform standard decomposition algorithms on a variety of high tree-width problems.

To harness modern multi-core processors, it is imperative to develop parallel versions of fundamental algorithms. In this paper, we present a general approach to best-first heuristic search in a shared-memory setting. Each thread attempts to expand the most promising open nodes. By using abstraction to partition the state space, we detect duplicate states without requiring frequent locking. We allow speculative expansions when necessary to keep threads busy. We identify and fix potential livelock conditions in our approach, verifying its correctness using temporal logic. In an empirical comparison on STRIPS planning, grid pathfinding, and sliding tile puzzle problems using an 8-core machine, we show that A* implemented in our framework yields faster search than improved versions of previous parallel search proposals. Our approach extends easily to other best-first searches, such as Anytime weighted A*.

Exploration for robotic mapping is typically handled using greedy entropy reduction. Here we show how to apply information lookahead planning to a challenging instance of this problem in which an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) maps hydrothermal vents. Given a simulation of vent behaviour we derive an observation function to turn the planning for mapping problem into a POMDP. We test a variety of information state MDP algorithms against greedy, systematic and reactive search strategies. We show that directly rewarding the AUV for visiting vents induces effective mapping strategies. We evaluate the algorithms in simulation and show that our information lookahead method outperforms the others.

Heuristic search using heuristics extracted from the delete relaxation is one of the most effective methods in planning. Since finding the optimal solution of the delete relaxation is intractable, various heuristics introduce independence assumptions, the implications of which are not yet fully understood. Here we use concepts from graph theory to show that in problems with unary action preconditions, the delete relaxation is closely related to the Steiner Tree problem, and that the independence assumption for the set of goals results in a tree-of-shortest-paths approximation. We analyze the limitations of this approximation and develop an alternative method for computing relaxed plans that addresses them. The method is used to guide a greedy best-first search, where it is shown to improve plan quality and coverage over several benchmark domains.

Distributed Constraint Optimization (DCOP) is a key technique for solving agent coordination problems. Because finding cost-minimal DCOP solutions is NP-hard, it is important to develop mechanisms for DCOP search algorithms that trade off their solution costs for smaller runtimes. However, existing tradeoff mechanisms do not provide relative error bounds. In this paper, we introduce three tradeoff mechanisms that provide such bounds, namely the Relative Error Mechanism, the Uniformly Weighted Heuristics Mechanism and the Non-Uniformly Weighted Heuristics Mechanism, for two DCOP algorithms, namely ADOPT and BnB-ADOPT. Our experimental results show that the Relative Error Mechanism generally dominates the other two tradeoff mechanisms for ADOPT and the Uniformly Weighted Heuristics Mechanism generally dominates the other two tradeoff mechanisms for BnB-ADOPT.

This paper deals with Decision-Making in the context of multiattribute utility theory and, more precisely, with the problem of efficiently determining the best alternative w.r.t. an agent's preferences (choice problem). We assume that alternatives are elements of a product set of attributes and that the agent's preferences are represented by a generalized additive decomposable (GAI) utility on this set. Such a function allows an efficient representation of interactions between attributes while preserving some decomposability of the model. GAI utilities can be compiled into graphical structures called GAI networks that can be exploited to solve choice problems using collect/distribute schemes essentially similar to those used in Bayesian networks. In this paper, rather than directly using this scheme on the GAI network for determining the most preferred alternative, we propose to work with another GAI function, acting as an upper-bound on utility values and enhancing the model's decomposability. This method still provides the exact optimal solution but speeds up significantly the search. It proves to be particularly useful when dealing with choice and ranking under constraints and within collective Decision-Making, where GAI nets tend to have a large size. We present an efficient algorithm for determining this new GAI function and provide experimental results highlighting the practical efficiency of our procedure.

Most planning problems have strong structures. They can be decomposed into subdomains with causal dependencies. The idea of exploiting the domain decomposition has motivated previous work such as hierarchical planning and factored planing. However, these algorithms require extensive backtracking and lead to few efficient general-purpose planners. On the other hand, heuristic search has been a successful approach to automated planning. The domain decomposition of planning problems, unfortunately, is not directly and fully exploited by heuristic search. We propose a novel and general framework to exploit domain decomposition. Based on a structure analysis on the SAS+ planning formalism, we stratify the sub-domains of a planning problem into dependency layers. By recognizing the stratification of a planning structure, we propose a space reduction method that expands only a subset of executable actions at each state. This reduction method can be combined with state-space search, allowing us to simultaneously employ the strength of domain decomposition and high-quality heuristics. We prove that the reduction preserves completeness and optimality of search and experimentally verify its effectiveness in space reduction.

This can increase the size of the Treewidth is a fundamental property of a graph with significant search exponentially. We explore two techniques implications for several areas of artificial intelligence that prevent this: duplicate detection and duplicate research. A reason for focusing on treewidth is that a natural avoidance. We illustrate these techniques on search space for it uses a maximum edge cost function. As the treewidth problem, a combinatorial optimization we discuss in a later section, in an iterative-deepening search problem with applications to a variety of research on a problem with a maximum edge cost function, every duplicate areas. The bottleneck for previous treewidth node can be discarded. This makes these problems algorithms is a large memory requirement. We develop well-suited for studying duplicate elimination techniques.

Search methods based on Monte-Carlo simulation have recently led to breakthrough performance improvements in difficult game-playing domains such as Go and General Game Playing. Monte-Carlo Random Walk (MRW) planning applies Monte-Carlo ideas to deterministic classical planning. In the forward chaining planner Arvand, Monte-Carlo random walks are used to explore the local neighborhood of a search state for action selection. In contrast to the stochastic local search approach used in the recent planner Identidem, random walks yield a larger and unbiased sample of the search neighborhood, and require state evaluations only at the endpoints of each walk. On IPC-4 competition problems, the performance of Arvand is competitive with state of the art systems.

Traditional AI search methods search in a state space typically modelled as a directed graph. Prohibitively large sizes of state space graphs make complete or optimal search expensive. A key observation, as exemplified by the SAS+ formalism for planning, is that most commonly a state-space graph can be decomposed into subgraphs, linked by constraints. We propose a novel space reduction algorithm that exploits such structure. The result reveals that standard search algorithms may explore many redundant paths. Our method provides an automatic way to remove such redundancy. At each state, we expand only the subgraphs within a dependency closure satisfying certain sufficient conditions instead of all the subgraphs. Theoretically we prove that the proposed algorithm is completeness-preserving as well as optimality-preserving. We show that our reduction method can significantly reduce the search cost on a collection of planning domains.