Dijkstra's single-source shortest-path algorithm (DA) is one of the well-known, fundamental algorithms in computer science and related fields. DA is commonly taught in undergraduate courses. Uniform-cost search (UCS) is a simple version of the best-first search scheme which is logically equivalent to DA. In this paper I compare the two algorithms and show their similarities and differences. I claim that UCS is superior to DA in almost all aspects. It is easier to understand and implement. Its time and memory needs are also smaller. The reason that DA is taught in universities and classes around the world is probably only historical. I encourage people to stop using and teaching DA, and focus on UCS only.

Search-based planning is widely used for mobile robot motion planning because of its guarantees of optimality and completeness. In continuous state-spaces, however, most existing approaches have significant limitations in terms of optimality and completeness because of the underlying grid used. We propose an approach that eliminates the dependency on grids by using more general equivalence classes to quickly find an initial solution and instead of pruning states that fall within an equivalence class and have higher cost, we use an inflated heuristic to lower the priority of these states in the search. In further iterations, we reduce the inflated heuristic in a principled way, thus providing fast solutions with provable suboptimality bounds that can be improved as time allows. The proposed approach produces smooth paths with the resolution dictated by the action set. Finer action sets produce higher resolution paths that are more computationally intensive to calculate and coarser action sets produce lower resolution paths that are faster to compute. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first algorithm that is able to plan in continuous state-spaces with provable guarantees on completeness and bounds on suboptimality for a given action set. Experimental results on 3D (x,y,theta) path planning show that, on average, this approach is able to find paths in less than two seconds that are within 2% of the optimal path cost in worlds of up to 1000x1000 m with a minimum step size of one meter.

Classical heuristic search algorithms find the solution cost of a problem while finding the path from the start state to a goal state. However, there are applications in which finding the path is not needed. In this paper we propose an algorithm that accurately and efficiently predicts the solution cost of a problem without finding the actual solution. We show empirically that our predictor makes more accurate predictions when compared to the bootstrapped heuristic, which is known to be a very accurate inadmissible heuristic. In addition, we show how our prediction algorithm can be used to enhance heuristic search algorithms. Namely, we use our predictor to calculate a bound for a bounded best-first search algorithm and to tune the w-value of Weighted IDA*. In both cases major search speedups were observed.

One popular and efficient scheme for solving exactly combinatorial optimization problems over graphical models is depth-first Branch and Bound. However, when the algorithm exploits problem decomposition using AND/OR search spaces, its anytime behavior breaks down. This paper 1) analyzes and demonstrates this inherent conflict between effective exploitation of problem decomposition (through AND/OR search spaces) and the anytime behavior of depth-first search (DFS), 2) presents a first scheme to address this issue while maintaining desirable DFS memory properties, 3) analyzes and demonstrates its effectiveness. Our work is applicable to any problem that can be cast as search over an AND/OR search space.

In this paper we describe novel representations for precomputed heuristics based on Level-Ordered Edge Sequence (LOES) encodings. We introduce compressed LOES, an extension to LOES that enables more aggressive compression of the state-set representation. We evaluate the novel repre- sentations against the respective perfect-hash and binary decision diagram (BDD) representations of pattern databases in a variety of STRIPS domains.

In many domains, different actions have different costs. In this paper, we show that various kinds of best-first search algorithms are sensitive to the ratio between the lowest and highest operator costs. First, we take common benchmark domains and show that when we increase the ratio of operator costs, the number of node expansions required to find a solution increases. Second, we provide a theoretical analysis showing one reason this phenomenon occurs. We also discuss additional domain features that can cause this increased difficulty. Third, we show that searching using distance-to-go estimates can significantly ameliorate this problem. Our analysis takes an important step toward understanding algorithm performance in the presence of differing costs. This research direction will likely only grow in importance as heuristic search is deployed to solve real-world problems.

A* is a best-first search algorithm that returns an optimal solution. w-admissible algorithms guarantee that the returned solution is no larger than w times the optimal solution. In this paper we introduce a generalization of the w-admissibility concept that we call PAC search, which is inspired by the PAC learning framework in Machine Learning. The task of a PAC search algorithm is to find a solution that is w-admissible with high probability. In this paper we formally define PAC search, and present a framework for PAC search algorithms that can work on top of any search algorithm that produces a sequence of solutions. Experimental results on the 15-puzzle demonstrate that our framework activated on top of Anytime Weighted A* (AWA*) expands significantly less nodes than regular AWA* while returning solutions that have almost the same quality.

Real-time search is a well known approach to solving search problems under tight time constraints. Recently, it has been shown that LSS-LRTA∗ , a well-known real-time search algorithm, can be improved when search is actively guided away of depressions. In this paper we investigate whether or not RTAA∗ can be improved in the same manner. We propose aRTAA∗ and daRTAA∗ , two algorithms based on RTAA∗ that avoid heuristic depressions. Both algorithms outperform RTAA∗ on standard path-finding tasks, obtaining better-quality solutions when the same time deadline is imposed on the duration of the planning episode. We prove, in addition, that both algorithms have good theoretical properties.

MAP is the problem of finding a most probable instantiation of a set of variables given evidence. MAP has always been perceived to be significantly harder than the related problems of computing the probability of a variable instantiation Pr, or the problem of computing the most probable explanation (MPE). This paper investigates the complexity of MAP in Bayesian networks. Specifically, we show that MAP is complete for NP^PP and provide further negative complexity results for algorithms based on variable elimination. We also show that MAP remains hard even when MPE and Pr become easy. For example, we show that MAP is NP-complete when the networks are restricted to polytrees, and even then can not be effectively approximated. Given the difficulty of computing MAP exactly, and the difficulty of approximating MAP while providing useful guarantees on the resulting approximation, we investigate best effort approximations. We introduce a generic MAP approximation framework. We provide two instantiations of the framework; one for networks which are amenable to exact inference Pr, and one for networks for which even exact inference is too hard. This allows MAP approximation on networks that are too complex to even exactly solve the easier problems, Pr and MPE. Experimental results indicate that using these approximation algorithms provides much better solutions than standard techniques, and provide accurate MAP estimates in many cases.

We explore a method for computing admissible heuristic evaluation functions for search problems. It utilizes pattern databases, which are precomputed tables of the exact cost of solving various subproblems of an existing problem. Unlike standard pattern database heuristics, however, we partition our problems into disjoint subproblems, so that the costs of solving the different subproblems can be added together without overestimating the cost of solving the original problem. Previously, we showed how to statically partition the sliding-tile puzzles into disjoint groups of tiles to compute an admissible heuristic, using the same partition for each state and problem instance. Here we extend the method and show that it applies to other domains as well. We also present another method for additive heuristics which we call dynamically partitioned pattern databases. Here we partition the problem into disjoint subproblems for each state of the search dynamically. We discuss the pros and cons of each of these methods and apply both methods to three different problem domains: the sliding-tile puzzles, the 4-peg Towers of Hanoi problem, and finding an optimal vertex cover of a graph. We find that in some problem domains, static partitioning is most effective, while in others dynamic partitioning is a better choice. In each of these problem domains, either statically partitioned or dynamically partitioned pattern database heuristics are the best known heuristics for the problem.