The cost of an optimal delete relaxed plan, known as h+, is a powerful admissible heuristic but is in general intractable to compute. In this paper we examine the problem of computing h+ by encoding it as a MAXSAT problem. We develop a new encoding that utilizes constraint generation to support the computation of a sequence of increasing lower bounds on h+. We show a close connection between the computations performed by a recent approach for solving MAXSAT and a hitting set approach recently proposed for computing h+. Using this connection we observe that our MAXSAT computation can be initialized with a set of landmarks computed by LM-cut. By judicious use of MAXSAT solving along with a technique of lazy heuristic evaluation we obtain speedups for finding optimal plans over LM-cut on a number of domains. Our approach enables the exploitation of continued progress in MAXSAT solving, and also makes it possible to consider computing or approximating heuristics that are even more informed that h+ by, for example, adding some information about deletes back into the encoding.

We study the symmetric rendezvous search problem in which two robots that are unaware of each other’s locations try to meet as quickly as possible. In the symmetric version of this problem, the robots are required to execute the same strategy. First, we present a symmetric rendezvous strategy for the robots that are initially placed on the open plane and analyze its competitive performance. We show that the competitive complexity of our strategy is O ( d / R ) where d is the initial distance between the robots and R is the communication radius. Second, we extend the symmetric rendezvous strategy for the open plane to unknown environments with polygonal obstacles. The extended strategy guarantees a complete coverage of the environment. We analyze the strategy for square, translating robots and show that the competitive ratio of the extended strategy is O ( d / D ) where D is the length of the sides of the robots. In obtaining this result, we also obtain an upper bound on covering arbitrary polygonal environments which may be of independent interest.

However, this approach usually requires expert users to write individual transformations for each data source manually. Figure 2: Delete grammar A variety of work (Kandel et al. 2011; Raman and Hellerstein 2001; Liang, Jordan, and Klein 2010) tries to take advantage of user input to solve the transformation problem, cally learn transformation rules through examples. As shown but these methods either cannot learn rules from training in Figure 1, a user might want to reverse the order of the date data or need the training data to contain all the intermediate and use hyphens to replace slashes. The user would just provide steps. We have developed an approach where the user the system with an example "30/07/2010" and "2010-only needs to provide the target value as an example.

In the multi agent path finding problem (MAPF) paths should be found for several agents, each with a different start and goal position such that agents do not collide. Previous optimal solvers applied global A*-based searches. We present a new search algorithm called Conflict Based Search (CBS). CBS is a two-level algorithm. At the high level, a search is performed on a tree based on conflicts between agents. At the low level, a search is performed only for a single agent at a time. In many cases this reformulation enables CBS to examine fewer states than A* while still maintaining optimality. We analyze CBS and show its benefits and drawbacks. Experimental results on various problems shows a speedup of up to a full order of magnitude over previous approaches.

Although successfully employed on many industrial problems, Combinatorial Optimization still has limited applicability on several real-world domains, often due to modeling difficulties. This is typically the case for systems under the control of an on-line policy: even when the policy itself is well known, capturing its effect on the system in a declarative model is often impossible by conventional means. Such a difficulty is at the root of the classical, sharp separation between off- line and on-line approaches. In this paper, we investigate a general method to model controlled systems, based on the integration of Machine Learning and Constraint Programming (CP). Specifically, we use an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to learn the behavior of a controlled system (a multicore CPU with thermal con- trollers) and plug it into a CP model by means of Neuron Constraints. The method obtains significantly better results compared to an approach with no ANN guidance. Neuron Constraints were first introduced in [Bartolini et al., 2011b] as a mean to model complex systems: providing evidence of their applicability to controlled systems is a significant step forward, broadening the application field of combinatorial methods and disclosing opportunities for hybrid off-line/on-line optimization.

An interesting strategy called configuration checking (CC) was recently proposed to handle the cycling problem in local search for Minimum Vertex Cover. A natural question is whether this CC strategy also works for SAT. The direct application of CC did not result in stochastic local search (SLS) algorithms that can compete with the current best SLS algorithms for SAT. In this paper, we propose a new heuristic based on CC for SLS algorithms for SAT, which is called configuration checking with aspiration (CCA). It is used to develop a new SLS algorithm called Swcca. The experiments on random 3-SAT instances show that Swcca significantly outperforms Sparrow2011, the winner of the random satisfiable category of the SAT Competition 2011, which is considered to be the best local search solver for random 3-SAT instances. Moreover, the experiments on structured instances show that Swcca is competitive with Sattime, the best local search solver for the crafted benchmark in the SAT Competition 2011.

One of the natural approaches for selecting actions in very From this perspective, an algorithm like RTDP fails on two large state spaces is by performing a limited amount of grounds: first, RTDP does not appear to make best use of lookahead. In the contexts of discounted MDPs, Kearns, short time windows in large state spaces; second, and more Mansour, and Ng have shown that near to optimal actions importantly, RTDP can use admissible heuristics but not informed can be selected by considering a sampled lookahead tree that base policies. On the other hand, algorithms like Policy is sufficiently sparse, whose size depends on the discount Iteration (Howard 1971), deliver all of these features except factor and the suboptimality bound but not on the number of one: they are exhaustive, and thus even to get started, problem states (Kearns, Mansour, and Ng 1999). The UCT they need vectors with the size of the state space. At the algorithm (Kocsis and Szepesvári 2006) is a version of this same time, while there are non-exhaustive versions of (asynchronous) form of Monte Carlo planning, where the lookahead trees Value Iteration such as RTDP, there are no similar are not grown depth-first but'best-first', following a selection'focused' versions of Policy Iteration ensuring anytime optimality.

This paper concerns learning and prediction with probabilistic models where the domain sizes of latent variables have no a priori upper-bound. Current approaches represent prior distributions over latent variables by stochastic processes such as the Dirichlet process, and rely on Monte Carlo sampling to estimate the model from data. We propose an alternative approach that searches over the domain size of latent variables, and allows arbitrary priors over the their domain sizes. We prove error bounds for expected probabilities, where the error bounds diminish with increasing search scope. The search algorithm can be truncated at any time . We empirically demonstrate the approach for topic modelling of text documents.

In hierarchical planning, landmarks are tasks that occur on any search path leading from the initial plan to a solution. In this work, we present novel domain-independent planning strategies based on such hierarchical landmarks. Our empirical evaluation on four benchmark domains shows that these landmark-aware strategies outperform established search strategies in many cases.

This paper provides a broad overview of the situation in the area of Parallel Search with a specific focus on Parallel SAT Solving. A set of challenges to researchers is presented which, we believe, must be met to ensure the practical applicability of Parallel SAT Solvers in the future. All these challenges are described informally, but put into perspective with related research results, and a (subjective) grading of difficulty for each of them is provided.