Limited lookahead has been studied for decades in perfect-information games. This paper initiates a new direction via two simultaneous deviation points: generalization to imperfect-information games and a game-theoretic approach. The question of how one should act when facing an opponent whose lookahead is limited is studied along multiple axes: lookahead depth, whether the opponent(s), too, have imperfect information, and how they break ties. We characterize the hardness of finding a Nash equilibrium or an optimal commitment strategy for either player, showing that in some of these variations the problem can be solved in polynomial time while in others it is PPAD-hard or NP-hard. We proceed to design algorithms for computing optimal commitment strategies for when the opponent breaks ties 1) favorably, 2) according to a fixed rule, or 3) adversarially. The impact of limited lookahead is then investigated experimentally. The limited-lookahead player often obtains the value of the game if she knows the expected values of nodes in the game tree for some equilibrium, but we prove this is not sufficient in general. Finally, we study the impact of noise in those estimates and different lookahead depths. This uncovers a lookahead pathology.

They concluded that UCT quickly finds Self-play Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) has a good but suboptimal policy, while Outcome Sampling initially been successful in many perfect-information twoplayer learns more slowly but converges to the optimal policy games. Although these methods have been over time. In this paper, we address the question whether the extended to imperfect-information games, so far inability of UCT to converge to a Nash equilibrium can be they have not achieved the same level of practical overcome while retaining UCT's fast initial learning rate. We success or theoretical convergence guarantees focus on the full-game MCTS setting, which is an important as competing methods. In this paper we step towards developing sound variants of online MCTS in introduce Smooth UCT, a variant of the established imperfect-information games. Upper Confidence Bounds Applied to Trees In particular, we introduce Smooth UCT, which combines (UCT) algorithm.

Parallel Test Paper Generation ( k -TPG) is a biobjective distributed resource allocation problem, which aims to generate multiple similarly optimal test papers automatically according to multiple user-specified criteria.Generating high-quality parallel test papers is challenging due to its NP-hardness in maximizing the collective objective functions.In this paper, we propose a Collective Biobjective Optimization (CBO) algorithm for solving k -TPG. CBO is a multi-step greedy-based approximation algorithm, which exploits the submodular property for biobjective optimization of k -TPG.Experiment results have shown that CBO has drastically outperformed the current techniques in terms of paper quality and runtime efficiency.

The aim of this paper is to propose a new approach interweaving preference elicitation and search to solve multiobjective optimization problems. We present an interactive search procedure directed by an aggregation function, possibly non-linear (e.g. an additive disutility function, a Choquet integral), defining the overall cost of solutions. This function is parameterized by weights that are initially unknown. Hence, we insert comparison queries in the search process to obtain useful preference information that will progressively reduce the uncertainty attached to weights. The process terminates by recommending a near-optimal solution ensuring that the gap to optimality is below the desired threshold. Our approach is tested on multiobjective state space search problems and appears to be quite efficient both in terms of number of queries and solution times.

We propose a new approach that exploits the good properties of core-guided and model-guided MaxSAT solvers. In particular, we show how to effectively exploit the structure of unsatisfiable cores in MaxSAT instances. Experimental results on industrial instances show that the proposed approach outperforms both complete and incomplete state-of-the-art MaxSAT solvers at the last international MaxSAT Evaluation in terms of robustness and total number of solved instances.

At each node of the search tree, Branch and Bound solvers for Max-SAT compute the lower bound (LB) by estimating the number of disjoint inconsistent subsets (IS) of the formula. IS are detected thanks to unit propagation (UP) then transformed by max-resolution to ensure that they are counted only once. However, it has been observed experimentally that the max-resolution transformations impact the capability of UP to detect further IS. Consequently, few transformations are learned and the LB computation is redundant. In this paper, we study the effect of the transformations on the UP mechanism. We introduce the notion of UP-resiliency of a transformation, which quantifies its impact on UP. It provides, from a theoretical point of view, an explanation to the empirical efficiency of the learning scheme developed in the last ten years. The experimental results we present give evidences of UP-resiliency relevance and insights on the behavior of the learning mechanism.

Exploiting parallelism is a key strategy for speeding up computation. However, on hard combinatorial problems, such a strategy has been surprisingly challenging due to the intricate variable interactions.We introduce a novel way in which parallelism can be used to exploit hidden structure of hard combinatorial problems. Our approach complements divide-and-conquer and portfolio approaches. We evaluate our approach on the minimum set basis problem: a core combinatorial problem with a range of applications in optimization, machine learning, and system security. We also highlight a novel sustainability related application, concerning the discovery of new materials for renewable energy sources such as improved fuel cell catalysts. In our approach, a large number of smaller sub-problems are identified and solved concurrently. We then aggregate the information from those solutions, and use this information to initialize the search of a global, complete solver. We show that this strategy leads to a substantial speed-up over a sequential approach, since the aggregated sub-problem solution information often provides key structural insights to the complete solver. Our approach also greatly outperforms state-of-the-art incomplete solvers in terms of solution quality. Our work opens up a novel angle for using parallelism to solve hard combinatorial problems.

We consider three important, non-strategyproof assignment mechanisms: Probabilistic Serial and two variants of the Boston mechanism. Under each of these mechanisms, we study the agent’s manipulation problem of determining a best response, i.e., a report that maximizes the agent’s expected utility. In particular, we consider local manipulation strategies, which are simple heuristics based on local, greedy search. We make three main contributions. First, we present results from a behavioral experiment (conducted on Amazon Mechanical Turk) which demonstrate that human manipulation strategies can largely be explained by local manipulation strategies. Second, we prove that local manipulation strategies may fail to solve the manipulation problem optimally. Third, we show via large-scale simulations that despite this non-optimality, these strategies are very effective on average. Our results demonstrate that while the manipulation problem may be hard in general, even cognitively or computationally bounded (human) agents can find near-optimal solutions almost all the time via simple local search strategies.

We consider the university course timetabling problem, which is one of the most studied problems in educational timetabling. In particular, we focus our attention on the formulation known as the curriculum-based course timetabling problem, which has been tackled by many researchers and for which there are many available benchmarks. The contribution of this paper is twofold. First, we propose an effective and robust single-stage simulated annealing method for solving the problem. Secondly, we design and apply an extensive and statistically-principled methodology for the parameter tuning procedure. The outcome of this analysis is a methodology for modeling the relationship between search method parameters and instance features that allows us to set the parameters for unseen instances on the basis of a simple inspection of the instance itself. Using this methodology, our algorithm, despite its apparent simplicity, has been able to achieve high quality results on a set of popular benchmarks. A final contribution of the paper is a novel set of real-world instances, which could be used as a benchmark for future comparison.

We propose an efficient ADMM method with guarantees for high-dimensional problems. We provide explicit bounds for the sparse optimization problem and the noisy matrix decomposition problem. For sparse optimization, we establish that the modified ADMM method has an optimal convergence rate of $\mathcal{O}(s\log d/T)$, where $s$ is the sparsity level, $d$ is the data dimension and $T$ is the number of steps. This matches with the minimax lower bounds for sparse estimation. For matrix decomposition into sparse and low rank components, we provide the first guarantees for any online method, and prove a convergence rate of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}((s+r)\beta^2(p) /T) + \mathcal{O}(1/p)$ for a $p\times p$ matrix, where $s$ is the sparsity level, $r$ is the rank and $\Theta(\sqrt{p})\leq \beta(p)\leq \Theta(p)$. Our guarantees match the minimax lower bound with respect to $s,r$ and $T$. In addition, we match the minimax lower bound with respect to the matrix dimension $p$, i.e. $\beta(p)=\Theta(\sqrt{p})$, for many important statistical models including the independent noise model, the linear Bayesian network and the latent Gaussian graphical model under some conditions. Our ADMM method is based on epoch-based annealing and consists of inexpensive steps which involve projections on to simple norm balls. Experiments show that for both sparse optimization and matrix decomposition problems, our algorithm outperforms the state-of-the-art methods. In particular, we reach higher accuracy with same time complexity.