Heuristic search is one of the most successful approaches to classical planning, finding solution paths in large state spaces. A major focus has been the development of domain-independent heuristic functions. One recent method are partial delete relaxation heuristics, improving over the standard delete relaxation heuristic through imposing a set C of conjunctions to be treated as atomic. Practical methods for selecting C are based on counter-example guided abstraction refinement, where iteratively a relaxed plan is checked for conflicts and new atomic conjunctions are introduced to address these. However, in each refinement step, the choice of possible new conjunctions is huge. The literature so far offers merely one simple strategy to make that choice. Here we fill that gap, considering a sizable space of basic ranking strategies as well as combinations thereof. We furthermore devise ranking strategies for conjunction-forgetting, where the ranking pertains to the current conjunctions and thus statistics over their usefulness can be maintained. Our experiments show that ranking strategies do make a large difference in performance, and that our new strategies can be useful.

Recent work aimed at developing a deeper understanding of suboptimal heuristic search has demonstrated that the use of a cost-based heuristic function in the presence of large operator cost ratio and the decision to allow re-opening of visited nodes can have a significant effect on search effort. In parallel research, phase transitions in problem solubility have proved useful in the study of problem difficulty for many computational problems and have recently been shown to exist in heuristic search problems. In this paper, we show that the impact on search effort associated with a larger operator cost ratio and the number of node re-expansions is concentrated almost entirely in the phase transition region. Combined with previous work connecting local minima in the search space with such behavior, these observations lead us to hypothesize a relationship between the phase transition and the existence of local minima.

Designing good heuristic functions for graph search requires adequate domain knowledge. It is often easy to design heuristics that perform well and correlate with the underlying true cost-to-go values in certain parts of the search space but these may not be admissible throughout the domain thereby affecting the optimality guarantees of the search. Bounded suboptimal search using several of such partially good but inadmissible heuristics was developed in Multi-Heuristic A* (MHA*). Although MHA* leverages multiple inadmissible heuristics to potentially generate a faster suboptimal solution, the original version does not improve the solution over time. It is an one shot algorithm that requires careful setting of inflation factors to obtain a desired one time solution. In this work, we tackle this issue by extending MHA* to an anytime version that finds a feasible suboptimal solution quickly and continually improve it until time runs out. Our work is inspired from the Anytime Repairing A* (ARA*) algorithm. We prove that our precise adaptation of ARA* concepts in the MHA* framework preserves the original suboptimal and completeness guarantees and enhances MHA* to perform in an anytime fashion. Furthermore, we report the performance of A-MHA* in 3-D path planning domain and sliding tiles puzzle and compare against MHA* and other anytime algorithms.

It is known that seemingly small details such as tie-breaking among nodes with the same f-cost can significantly affect the performance of a best-first search algorithm on many domains (Asai and Fukunaga 2017). In this paper, we show that low-level algorithmic details of domain-independent planning heuristics can have a surprisingly large impact on search performance. As a case study, we consider the well-known FF heuristic (hff) (Hoffmann and Nebel 2001).

Many existing boundedly-suboptimal heuristic search algorithms are variants of best-first search. Due to memory limitations, these algorithms are unable to solve problems with extremely large search spaces. In this paper, we present a framework that allows best-first search algorithms to solve problems with such large search spaces given a (reasonable) memory bound while also preserving optimality guarantees in tree-structured search spaces. In our framework, a given algorithm is run several times. In each search episode, the algorithm expands up to a user-defined number of states. After each episode, unless the goal has been found, the heuristic values of the generated states are updated using a linear-time algorithm that preserves consistency in tree-structured search spaces. In subsequent search episodes, only the heuristic values of the states generated in the previous episode need to be kept in memory. We present experimental results where we plug A*, GBFS, and wA* into our framework to solve traveling salesman problems and compare them against benchmark linear-memory algorithms like DFBnB and wDFBnB.

Multi-Agent Pathfinding (MAPF) over grids is the problem of finding n non-conflicting paths that lead n agents from a given initial cell to a given goal cell. Cost-optimal MAPF in addition minimizes the total number of actions performed by each agent before stopping at the goal. Being a combinatorial problem in nature, a number of compilations from MAPF to Answer Set Programming (ASP) exist. In this paper we propose a new one, which unlike existing ASP approaches (1) produces cost-optimal solutions, (2) exploits information that can be pre-computed quickly using Dijkstra's algorithm, and (3) when grounded, produces a number of clauses that grows linearly with the number of agents. In our empirical evaluation, in which we use the clasp solver, we show that our approach is superior to heuristic-search-based algorithms in various settings.

In dynamic environments, agents often do not have time to find a complete plan to reach a goal state, but rather must act quickly under changing circumstances. Real-time heuristic search models this setting by requiring that the agent's next action must be selected within a prespecified time bound. In this paper, we study real-time search algorithms that can tolerate a dynamic environment, in which action costs are not fully predictable. We propose a combination of two previously-proposed methods and study its behavior both theoretically and empirically on several different benchmark domains.

In this paper, we develop a general interactive method to solve multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems with imprecise preferences. Assuming that preferences can be represented by a parameterized scalarizing function, we iteratively ask preferences queries to the decision maker in order to reduce the uncertainty over the preference parameters until being able to determine her preferred solution. To produce informative preference queries at each step, we generate promising solutions using the extreme points of the polyhedron representing the admissible preference parameters and then we ask the decision maker to compare two of these solutions (we propose different selection strategies). These extreme points are also used to provide a stopping criterion guaranteeing that the returned solution is optimal (or near-optimal) according to the decision maker's preferences. For the multi-objective spanning tree problem with a linear aggregation function, we provide numerical results to demonstrate the practical efficiency of our approach and we compare our results to a recent approach based on minimax regret, where preferences are asked during the construction of a solution. We show that better results are achieved by our method both in terms of running time and number of questions.

This paper proves several new properties of the Meet in the Middle (MMe) bidirectional heuristic search algorithm when applied to graphs with unit edge costs. Primarily, it is shown that the length of the first path discovered by MMe never exceeds the optimal length by more than one and that if the length of the first path found is odd, then it must be optimal. These properties suggest that the search strategy should emphasize finding a complete path as soon as possible. Computational experiments demonstrate that fully exploiting these new properties can decrease the number of nodes expanded by anywhere from twofold to over tenfold.

Recent work in bidirectional heuristic search characterize pairs of nodes from which at least one node must be expanded in order to ensure optimality of solutions. We use these findings to propose a method for improving existing heuristics by propagating lower bounds between the forward and backward frontiers. We then define a number of desirable properties for bidirectional heuristic search algorithms, and show that applying the bound propagations adds these properties to many existing algorithms (e.g. to the MM family of algorithms). Finally, experimental results show that applying these propagations significantly reduce the running time of various algorithms.