Fairness and robustness are critical elements of Trustworthy AI that need to be addressed together. Fairness is about learning an unbiased model while robustness is about learning from corrupted data, and it is known that addressing only one of them may have an adverse affect on the other. In this work, we propose a sample selection-based algorithm for fair and robust training. To this end, we formulate a combinatorial optimization problem for the unbiased selection of samples in the presence of data corruption. Observing that solving this optimization problem is strongly NP-hard, we propose a greedy algorithm that is efficient and effective in practice. Experiments show that our algorithm obtains fairness and robustness that are better than or comparable to the state-of-the-art technique, both on synthetic and benchmark real datasets. Moreover, unlike other fair and robust training baselines, our algorithm can be used by only modifying the sampling step in batch selection without changing the training algorithm or leveraging additional clean data.

A.1 MCTS-kSubS algorithm In Algorithm 4 we present a general MCTS solver based on AlphaZero. Solver repeatedly queries the planner for a list of actions and executes them one by one. Baseline planner returns only a single action at a time, whereas MCTS-kSubS gives around kactions - to reach the desired subgoal (number of actions depends on a subgoal distance, which not always equals k in practice). MCTS-kSubS operates on a high-level subgoal graph: nodes are subgoals proposed by the generator (see Algorithm 3) and edges - lists of actions informing how to move from one subgoal to another (computed by the low-level conditional policy in Algorithm 2). The graph structure is represented by treevariable. For every subgoal, it keeps up to C3 best nearby subgoals (according to generator scores) along with a mentioned list of actions and sum of rewards to obtain while moving from the parent to the child subgoal. Most of MCTS implementation is shared between MCTS-kSubS and AlphaZero baseline, as we can treat the behavioral-cloning policy as a subgoal generator with k = 1. MCTS-kSubS and the baseline are encapsulated in GEN_CHILDREN function (Algorithms 5 and 6).

Graph neural architecture search (GraphNAS) has recently aroused considerable attention in both academia and industry. However, two key challenges seriously hinder the further research of GraphNAS. First, since there is no consensus for the experimental setting, the empirical results in different research papers are often not comparable and even not reproducible, leading to unfair comparisons. Secondly, GraphNAS often needs extensive computations, which makes it highly inefficient and inaccessible to researchers without access to large-scale computation. To solve these challenges, we propose NAS-Bench-Graph, a tailored benchmark that supports unified, reproducible, and efficient evaluations for GraphNAS.

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

We extend the traditional worst-case, minimax analysis of stochastic convex optimization by introducing a localized form of minimax complexity for individual functions. Our main result gives function-specific lower and upper bounds on the number of stochastic subgradient evaluations needed to optimize either the function or its "hardest local alternative" to a given numerical precision. The bounds are expressed in terms of a localized and computational analogue of the modulus of continuity that is central to statistical minimax analysis. We show how the computational modulus of continuity can be explicitly calculated in concrete cases, and relates to the curvature of the function at the optimum. We also prove a superefficiency result that demonstrates it is a meaningful benchmark, acting as a computational analogue of the Fisher information in statistical estimation. The nature and practical implications of the results are demonstrated in simulations.

As search depth increases in autonomous reasoning and embodied planning, the candidate action space expands exponentially, heavily taxing computational budgets. While heuristic pruning is a common countermeasure, it operates without formal safety guarantees when surrogate models (like LLMs) exhibit systematic evaluation biases. This paper frames the node expansion process as a localized Best-Arm Identification (BAI) problem over dynamic frontiers, subject to a bounded systematic bias $L$. By inverting the Lambert W function, we establish an additive sample complexity of $\mathcal{O}((Δ-4L)^{-2})$, which indicates that safe node elimination is only feasible when the empirical reward gap exceeds $4L$. We complement this with an information-theoretic lower bound of $Ω((Δ-2L)^{-2})$ to confirm the structural limits of biased search. Subsequent evaluations on both synthetic trees and complex reasoning tasks demonstrate that adhering to this local safety boundary successfully preserves optimal trajectories while maximizing sample allocation efficiency.