We study the dynamic joint assortment selection and positioning problem, where the attraction of each product depends on both its intrinsic appeal and its display position under a Multinomial Logit (MNL) choice framework. Our study ranges from the multiplicative position effects model, in which each product's attraction is scaled by a position-specific factor, to a general position effects model assigning independent attraction parameters to every product--position pair to capture heterogeneous synergies. For both models, we design round-based learning algorithms that update decisions after every single feedback, and establish the first regret-optimal characterization. Besides, our round-based algorithms provide the prompt operations needed by modern platforms. For the multiplicative model, we develop a cross-position pairwise maximum likelihood estimator with a clipping mechanism, and prove that our algorithm P2MLE-UCB attains a regret of $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{NT})$, matching the lower bound and closing the $\sqrt{K}$ gap left by prior epoch-based analyses. For the general model, we establish a minimax lower bound and propose GP2-UCB with a matching upper bound. Moreover, we design an efficient subroutine for the per-round joint assortment and positioning optimization based on Dinkelbach's method and maximum-weight bipartite matching. Numerical experiments on synthetic data and the Expedia dataset show that our algorithms consistently outperform state-of-the-art benchmarks.

Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) are central to uncovering causal structure in complex systems, yet learning a single DAG from data is often challenging: model uncertainty, finite samples, and a combinatorially large search space frequently yield unstable estimates. We propose DAGgr, a model averaging framework that aggregates multiple candidate DAGs into a single stable representation. Candidate graphs are weighted by their out-of-sample predictive likelihood across repeated data splits, and a thresholding rule on the resulting edge-importance scores guarantees that the aggregated graph is itself acyclic. We establish a finite-sample risk bound, prove that the procedure preserves acyclicity, and show that edge selection is consistent under mild conditions on the weights. Simulations across random, hub, and chain structures, together with an analysis of the Sachs et al. (2005) protein-signaling network, show that DAGgr matches or exceeds the best individual candidate while consistently outperforming bootstrap-aggregation baselines across structural recovery metrics.

We study episodic reinforcement learning with fixed reward and transition functions, but with episode-dependent admissible action sets that are observed at the start of each episode. Performance is measured by cumulative regret against the episode-wise optimal value, $\sum_{k=1}^K [V^{*,M^k} - V^{π^k,M^k}]$, where $M^k$ represents the action context in the $k$-th episode. We show that the MVP algorithm naturally extends to this framework and enjoys strong theoretical guarantees. In particular, we establish a minimax regret bound of $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{SAH^3K\log L})$ for adversarial contexts, where $L$ denotes the number of possible contexts. This result implies a regret bound of $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{SAH^3K})$ for stochastic contexts. We further translate the stochastic regret guarantee into a sample complexity bound of $\widetilde{O}(SAH^3/ε^2)$ for a fixed context distribution. In addition, we derive a gap-dependent regret bound of \[ \widetilde O\left( \inf_{p\in [0,1)} \left( \frac{1}{Δ_{\min}^{p}} + pKΔ_{\min}^{p} \right)\log K \cdot \mathrm{poly}(S,A,H) \right), \] where $Δ_{\min}^{p}$ is the global $p$-trimmed positive-gap floor over suboptimal $(h,s,a)$ triples. This bound can substantially improve upon the minimax rate when the relevant suboptimality gaps are large.

Dependence among marginally constrained observations can break a finite-sample barrier. To formalize this phenomenon, we introduce the \emph{minimum list entropy coupling} $H(P\|Q_1,\dots,Q_m)$, the minimum conditional entropy $H(X|Y_1,\dots,Y_m)$ over all joint distributions with prescribed discrete marginals $X\sim P$ and $Y_i\sim Q_i$. Unlike classical formulations based on independent observations, our model allows $Y_1,\dots,Y_m$ to be arbitrarily dependent while keeping each marginal fixed. This enlarged coupling space reveals a sharp dichotomy: independent observations reduce residual uncertainty exponentially, whereas dependent observations can eliminate it exactly after finitely many samples. We characterize this zero-entropy regime through necessary and sufficient conditions and give concrete structural criteria under which it occurs. In particular, under mild support assumptions, zero entropy is achieved with $O(\log(1/P_{\min}))$ observations, where $P_{\min}$ is the minimum nonzero mass of $P$. We also develop a greedy algorithm with monotone approximation guarantees for computing $H(P\|Q_1,\dots,Q_m)$. Finally, we show that the same framework formalizes finite-sample limits in distribution-matching representation learning and randomness extraction, where zero entropy corresponds to exact recovery and exact extraction.

We study the fixed-budget max-min action identification problem in depth-2 max-min trees, an important special case of Monte Carlo Tree Search. A learner sequentially allocates $T$ samples to leaves and then recommends a subtree whose minimum leaf value is largest. Motivated by approximate planning, we focus on $\varepsilon$-good subtree identification, where any subtree whose min value is within $\varepsilon$ of the optimal maximin value is acceptable. Our main contribution is an $\varepsilon$-agnostic algorithm: it does not require $\varepsilon$ as input, but achieves instance-dependent error bounds for every meaningful $\varepsilon$. We show that the misidentification probability decays as $\exp(-\widetildeΘ(T/H_2(\varepsilon)))$, where $H_2(\varepsilon)$ captures both cross-subtree and within-subtree gaps. When each subtree has a single leaf, the problem reduces to standard fixed-budget best-arm identification, and our analysis recovers, up to accelerating factors, known $\varepsilon$-good guarantees for halving-style methods while giving a new $\varepsilon$-good guarantee for Successive Rejects. On the lower-bound side, we provide complementary positive and negative results showing that max-min identification has a different hardness structure from standard $K$-armed bandits. To our knowledge, this is the first provable fixed-budget algorithmic guarantee for max-min action identification.

Unbalanced optimal transport (UOT) extends classical optimal transport to measures with different total masses, but statistical guarantees for Monge-type estimation remain limited. We study unbalanced transport with quadratic cost and Kullback-Leibler marginal penalties and argue that the natural population target is not a map alone, but a transport-growth pair. Consequently, we develop two estimators for the transport-growth pairs under several setups: an optimal transport plan-based estimator for a general case, and a kernel-based estimator for a case with smooth densities. We also show that an error of the estimator achieves the minimax optimal rate by deriving a matching lower bound of the minimax risk. Our main technical contribution is a value-based stability reduction that converts perturbations of the UOT objective into transport and growth risks through a UOT gap condition. These results provide a statistical foundation for Monge-type estimation in unbalanced optimal transport.

We study the $\textit{single-index bandit}$ problem, where rewards depend on an unknown one-dimensional projection of high-dimensional contexts through an unknown reward function. This model extends linear and generalized linear bandits to a nonparametric setting, and is particularly relevant when the reward function is not known in advance. While optimal regret guarantees are known for monotone reward functions, the general non-monotone case remains poorly understood, with the best known bound being $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{3/4})$ (under standard boundedness and Lipschitz assumptions on the reward function [Kang et al., 2025]). We close this gap by establishing the optimal regret for general single-index bandits. We propose a simple two-phase algorithm, namely, Zoomed Single Index Bandit with Upper Confidence Bound ($\texttt{ZoomSIB-UCB}$), that first estimates the projection direction via a normalized Stein estimator, and then reduces the problem to a one-dimensional bandit using discretization and finally use UCB. This approach achieves a regret of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{2/3})$, and improves significantly upon prior work without any additional assumptions. We also prove a matching minimax lower bound of $\tildeΩ(T^{2/3})$, showing that the upper bound is essentially tight. Our upper and lower bounds together provide a sharp characterization of the regret in single-index bandits. Moreover, the empirical results further demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of our approach.

Distributional causal inference requires estimating not only average treatment effects but also interventional outcome distributions, including quantiles, tail risks, and policy-dependent uncertainty. As a method for distributional causal inference, generative adversarial network (GAN)-based counterfactual methods are flexible tools for this task. However, these methods have several limitations. First, the objectives of certain techniques do not coincide with the statistical risk of the identifiable causal target, and therefore provide limited theoretical guarantees regarding estimable counterfactual distributions or optimality. Second, they tend to rely on unstable density-based methods, such as density ratio estimation. In this paper, we propose GANICE (GAN for Interventional Conditional Estimation) with several advantages: it (i) clarifies the conditional interventional distribution for each treatment--covariate state as the causal estimation target; (ii) estimates the conditional distribution such that its averaged Wasserstein risk is minimized; (iii) establishes minimax optimality. GANICE achieves these advantages through the introduction of the extended Wasserstein distance, the incorporation of a cellwise critic in its dual, and an optimality proof based on Besov space theory. Our experiments demonstrate that GANICE consistently outperforms existing methods.

We study a class of bilevel optimization problems in which both the upper- and lower-level problems have minimax structures. This setting captures a broad range of emerging applications. Despite the extensive literature on bilevel optimization and minimax optimization separately, existing methods mainly focus on bilevel optimization with lower-level minimization problems, often under strong convexity assumptions, and are not directly applicable to the minimax lower-level setting considered here. To address this gap, we develop penalty-based first-order methods for bilevel minimax optimization without requiring strong convexity of the lower-level problem. In the deterministic setting, we establish that the proposed method finds an $ε$-KKT point with $\tilde{O}(ε^{-4})$ oracle complexity. We further show that bilevel problems with convex constrained lower-level minimization can be reformulated as special cases of our framework via Lagrangian duality, leading to an $\tilde{O}(ε^{-4})$ complexity bound that improves upon the existing $\tilde{O}(ε^{-7})$ result. Finally, we extend our approach to the stochastic setting, where only stochastic gradient oracles are available, and prove that the proposed stochastic method finds a nearly $ε$-KKT point with $\tilde{O}(ε^{-9})$ oracle complexity.

We formalize Rollout Informativeness under a Fixed Budget (RIFB) as the expected non-vanishing policy-gradient mass that a tool-use rollout set injects into Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). We prove that any budget-agnostic independent sampler suffers a collapse rate bounded away from zero for hard prompts regardless of the budget. Motivated by this, we recast intermediate state selection as a monotone submodular maximization problem, where a greedy one-step selector enjoys a 1 minus 1/e approximation guarantee. Our Uncertainty-aware Upper Confidence Bound (UUCB) terms arise as closed-form marginal gains of this objective. This turns the token-level entropy bonus from an empirical trick into an analytic consequence of the formulation. We present InfoTree, a training-time tree-search framework coupling UUCB with a learned Adaptive Budget Allocator (ABA) and an asynchronous Speculative Expansion scheme. ABA rescues prompts whose initial tree is wasted on uniform outcomes, lifting the mixed-outcome ratio from 58.1 percent to 76.3 percent with less than 5 percent budget overhead. Speculative Expansion reduces wall-clock overhead from 14.3 percent to 4.8 percent by tolerating bounded staleness in UUCB scores. Across nine benchmarks spanning math reasoning (AIME 2024 and 2025, MATH-500, OlympiadBench, USAMO), web-search agents (GAIA, HLE-100, BrowseComp-lite), and tool-rich coding and OS agents (APPS-verified, AgentBench-OS), InfoTree outperforms flat GRPO, DeepSearch, Tree-GRPO, AT2PO, CW-GRPO, and RC-GRPO. Head-to-head compositions with Tree-GRPO prefix sharing and CW-GRPO contribution weights deliver further gains, confirming that our selector operates orthogonally to rollout reuse and trajectory re-weighting. A 5 by 5 by 5 robustness grid reveals that over three quarters of the hyperparameter space lies on a performance plateau, confirming UUCB robustness.