With the increasing number of financial services available online, the rate of financial fraud has also been increasing. The traffic and transaction rates on the internet have increased considerably, leading to a need for fast decision-making. Financial institutions also have stringent regulations that often require transparency and explainability of the decision-making process. However, most state-of-the-art algorithms currently used in the industry are highly parameterized black-box models that rely on complex computations to generate a score. These algorithms are inherently slow and lack the explainability and speed of traditional rule-based learners. This work introduces SR-MCTS (Symbolic Regression MCTS), which utilizes a foundational GPT model to guide the MCTS, significantly enhancing its convergence speed and the quality of the generated expressions which are further extracted to rules. Our experiments show that SR-MCTS can detect fraud more efficiently than widely used methods in the industry while providing substantial insights into the decision-making process.

The unchecked spread of digital information, combined with increasing political polarization and the tendency of individuals to isolate themselves from opposing political viewpoints, has driven researchers to develop systems for automatically detecting political bias in media. This trend has been further fueled by discussions on social media. We explore methods for categorizing bias in US news articles, comparing rule-based and deep learning approaches. The study highlights the sensitivity of modern self-learning systems to unconstrained data ingestion, while reconsidering the strengths of traditional rule-based systems. Applying both models to left-leaning (CNN) and right-leaning (FOX) news articles, we assess their effectiveness on data beyond the original training and test sets.This analysis highlights each model's accuracy, offers a framework for exploring deep-learning explainability, and sheds light on political bias in US news media. We contrast the opaque architecture of a deep learning model with the transparency of a linguistically informed rule-based model, showing that the rule-based model performs consistently across different data conditions and offers greater transparency, whereas the deep learning model is dependent on the training set and struggles with unseen data.

In clinical practice, decision-making relies heavily on established protocols, often formalised as rules. Concurrently, Machine Learning (ML) models, trained on clinical data, aspire to integrate into medical decision-making processes. However, despite the growing number of ML applications, their adoption into clinical practice remains limited. Two critical concerns arise, relevant to the notions of consistency and continuity of care: (a) accuracy - the ML model, albeit more accurate, might introduce errors that would not have occurred by applying the protocol; (b) interpretability - ML models operating as black boxes might make predictions based on relationships that contradict established clinical knowledge. In this context, the literature suggests using ML models integrating domain knowledge for improved accuracy and interpretability. However, there is a lack of appropriate metrics for comparing ML models with clinical rules in addressing these challenges. Accordingly, in this article, we first propose metrics to assess the accuracy of ML models with respect to the established protocol. Secondly, we propose an approach to measure the distance of explanations provided by two rule sets, with the goal of comparing the explanation similarity between clinical rule-based systems and rules extracted from ML models. The approach is validated on the Pima Indians Diabetes dataset by training two neural networks - one exclusively on data, and the other integrating a clinical protocol. Our findings demonstrate that the integrated ML model achieves comparable performance to that of a fully data-driven model while exhibiting superior accuracy relative to the clinical protocol, ensuring enhanced continuity of care. Furthermore, we show that our integrated model provides explanations for predictions that align more closely with the clinical protocol compared to the data-driven model.

Open rule refer to the implication from premise atoms to hypothesis atoms, which captures various relations between instances in the real world. Injecting open rule knowledge into the machine helps to improve the performance of downstream tasks such as dialogue and relation extraction. Existing approaches focus on single-hop open rule generation, ignoring multi-hop scenarios, leading to logical inconsistencies between premise and hypothesis atoms, as well as semantic duplication of generated rule atoms. To address these issues, we propose a progressive multi-stage open rule generation method called PRIMO. We introduce ontology information during the rule generation stage to reduce ambiguity and improve rule accuracy. PRIMO constructs a multi-stage structure consisting of generation, extraction, and ranking modules to fully leverage the latent knowledge within the language model across multiple dimensions. Furthermore, we employ reinforcement learning from human feedback to further optimize model, enhancing the model's understanding of commonsense knowledge. Experiments show that compared to baseline models, PRIMO significantly improves rule quality and diversity while reducing the repetition rate of rule atoms.

An efficient algorithm, Apriori_Goal, is proposed for constructing association rules for a relational database with a given classification. The algorithm's features are related to the specifics of the database and the method of encoding its records. The algorithm proposes five criteria that characterize the quality of the rules being constructed. Different criteria are also proposed for filtering the sets used when constructing association rules. The proposed method of encoding records allows for an efficient implementation of the basic operation underlying the computation of rule characteristics. The algorithm works with a relational database, where the columns can be of different types, both continuous and discrete. Among the columns, a target discrete column is distinguished, which defines the classification of the records. This allows the original database to be divided into $n$ subsets according to the number of categories of the target parameter. A classical example of such databases is medical databases, where the target parameter is the diagnosis established by doctors. A preprocessor, which is an important part of the algorithm, converts the properties of the objects represented by the columns of the original database into binary properties and encodes each record as a single integer. In addition to saving memory, the proposed format allows the complete preservation of information about the binary properties representing the original record. More importantly, the computationally intensive operations on records, required for calculating rule characteristics, are performed almost instantly in this format using a pair of logical operations on integers.

The thesis explores novel methods for Human Activity Recognition (HAR) using passive radar with a focus on non-intrusive Wi-Fi Channel State Information (CSI) data. Traditional HAR approaches often use invasive sensors like cameras or wearables, raising privacy issues. This study leverages the non-intrusive nature of CSI, using Spiking Neural Networks (SNN) to interpret signal variations caused by human movements. These networks, integrated with symbolic reasoning frameworks such as DeepProbLog, enhance the adaptability and interpretability of HAR systems. SNNs offer reduced power consumption, ideal for privacy-sensitive applications. Experimental results demonstrate SNN-based neurosymbolic models achieve high accuracy making them a promising alternative for HAR across various domains.

In this paper, we present an innovative iterative approach to rule learning specifically designed for (but not limited to) text-based data. Our method focuses on progressively expanding the vocabulary utilized in each iteration resulting in a significant reduction of memory consumption. Moreover, we introduce a Value of Confidence as an indicator of the reliability of the generated rules. By leveraging the Value of Confidence, our approach ensures that only the most robust and trustworthy rules are retained, thereby improving the overall quality of the rule learning process. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method through extensive experiments on various textual as well as non-textual datasets including a use case of significant interest to insurance industries, showcasing its potential for real-world applications.

Current trends in Machine Learning prefer explainability even when it comes at the cost of performance. Therefore, explainable AI methods are particularly important in the field of Fraud Detection. This work investigates the applicability of Differentiable Inductive Logic Programming (DILP) as an explainable AI approach to Fraud Detection. Although the scalability of DILP is a well-known issue, we show that with some data curation such as cleaning and adjusting the tabular and numerical data to the expected format of background facts statements, it becomes much more applicable. While in processing it does not provide any significant advantage on rather more traditional methods such as Decision Trees, or more recent ones like Deep Symbolic Classification, it still gives comparable results. We showcase its limitations and points to improve, as well as potential use cases where it can be much more useful compared to traditional methods, such as recursive rule learning.

This study presents the ``Arabic Derivational ChainBank,'' a novel framework for modeling Arabic derivational morphology. It establishes connections between forms and meanings by constructing a chain of derived words that reflect their derivational significance. To expedite the process, a rule-based methodology was employed, avoiding time-consuming manual annotation. The derivational network was then aligned with the CamelMorph morphological analyzer database. This two-step process resulted in a chain of derived word lemmas linked to their roots, encompassing 23,333 evaluated derivational relations, thereby demonstrating the efficiency of the ChainBank.

Eighty years after the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank were created to stabilize the global economy in the wake of World War II, the role of those organizations and the guiding principles behind their creation has largely fallen out of fashion. The I.M.F. and World Bank were designed to embrace a new system of economic order and international cooperation, one that would stitch the world economy together and allow rich nations to help poorer ones through trade and investment. But today, those who espouse such "neoliberal" notions of open markets are increasingly lonely voices. They could soon become even more isolated if former President Donald J. Trump is re-elected. Mr. Trump is promising to upend the rules of international commerce by ratcheting up the kind of trade wars and protectionist policies that characterized his first term.